| Literature DB >> 29617288 |
Lei Lin1,2, Tao Dong3,4, Pengcheng Nie5,6,7, Fangfang Qu8,9, Yong He10,11, Bingquan Chu12,13, Shupei Xiao14,15.
Abstract
Thiabendazole is widely used in sclerotium blight, downy mildew and black rot prevention and treatment in rape. Accurate monitoring of thiabendazole pesticides in plants will prevent potential adverse effects to the Environment and human health. Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) is a highly sensitive fingerprint with the advantages of simple operation, convenient portability and high detection efficiency. In this paper, a rapid determination method of thiabendazole pesticides in rape was conducted combining SERS with chemometric methods. The original SERS were pretreated and the partial least squares (PLS) was applied to establish the prediction model between SERS and thiabendazole pesticides in rape. As a result, the SERS enhancing effect based on silver Nano-substrate was better than that of gold Nano-substrate, where the detection limit of thiabendazole pesticides in rape could reach 0.1 mg/L. Moreover, 782, 1007 and 1576 cm−1 could be determined as thiabendazole pesticides Raman characteristic peaks in rape. The prediction effect of thiabendazole pesticides in rape was the best ( R p 2 = 0.94, RMSEP = 3.17 mg/L) after the original spectra preprocessed with 1st-Derivative, and the linear relevance between thiabendazole pesticides concentration and Raman peak intensity at 782 cm−1 was the highest (R² = 0.91). Furthermore, five rape samples with unknown thiabendazole pesticides concentration were used to verify the accuracy and reliability of this method. It was showed that prediction relative standard deviation was 0.70–9.85%, recovery rate was 94.71–118.92% and t value was −1.489. In conclusion, the thiabendazole pesticides in rape could be rapidly and accurately detected by SERS, which was beneficial to provide a rapid, accurate and reliable scheme for the detection of pesticides residues in agriculture products.Entities:
Keywords: PLS; Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS); rape; rapid detection; thiabendazole pesticides
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29617288 PMCID: PMC5948739 DOI: 10.3390/s18041082
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1The molecular structure of thiabendazole and its positions of functional groups vibration. (a) The molecular structure of thiabendazole; (b) Raman Spectroscopy (RS) of thiabendazole solid; (c) the thiabendazole RS simulated by density functional theory (DFT).
The proposed assignment of Raman bands of thiabendazole.
| Calculation (cm−1) | Solid (cm−1) | SERS-Ag (cm−1) | SERS-Au (cm−1) | Assignments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 606 (w) | 615 (w) | 626 (w) | 626 (w) | δ(C–C–C)ip δ(S–C–N)ip |
| 748 (m) | 778 (m) | 782 (vs) | 783 (m) | δ(C–H)oop |
| 957 (w) | 985 (w) | 988 (m) | - | υ(C–S) |
| 1000 (m) | 1010 (m) | 1007 (vs) | 1007 (s) | δ(C–H)ip |
| 1139 (w) | 1118 (w) | 1116 (w) | 1116 (w) | δ(C–H)ip |
| 1158 (m) | 1154 (w) | 1147 (m) | 1147 (w) | δ(C–H)ip |
| 1215 (w) | 1255 (m) | 1239 (w) | - | υ ring |
| 1270 (s) | 1277 (s) | 1279 (m) | 1270 (m) | υ ring + δ(C–H)ip |
| 1313 (w) | 1303 (w) | 1322 (m) | 1326 (m) | δ(C–H)ip |
| 1401 (w) | 1403 (w) | 1404 (m) | 1406 (m) | υ(C=C) |
| 1445 (s) | 1456 (s) | 1433 (w) | 1462 (m) | υ(C=N) |
| 1498 (w) | 1492 (w) | 1492 (w) | 1493 (w) | υ(C=C) + δ(N–H)ip |
| 1579 (vs) | 1577 (vs) | 1576 (s) | 1586 (s) | υ(C=N) |
| 1599 (s) | 1591 (s) | - | - | υ(C=N) |
| 1641 (w) | 1623 (w) | 1621 (w) | 1626 (w) | υ(C=N) |
Note: vs = very strong; s = strong; m = medium; w = weak; υ = stretching; opp = outer surface bending; ip = Inner surface bending; δ = deformable vibration.
Figure 2The structure and diameter of silver and gold nanoparticles: (a) Silver nanoparticle; (b) gold nanoparticle.
Figure 3The RS of silver and gold substrate: (a) Silver Nano-substrate; (b) gold Nano-substrate.
Figure 4The Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) of the thiabendazole standard solution (100 mg/L) with silver and gold nanoparticle: (a) Silver; (b) gold; (c) acetonitrile.
The results of pre-processing method for calibration and prediction model.
| Pre-Processing Method | Principal Components | Calibration | Prediction | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| RMSEC (mg/L) |
| RMSEP (mg/L) | ||
| Original | 5 | 0.86 | 2.86 | 0.90 | 4.77 |
| MSC | 5 | 0.92 | 3.21 | 0.72 | 3.48 |
| SNV | 5 | 0.90 | 2.99 | 0.72 | 3.51 |
| Normalization | 5 | 0.86 | 4.32 | 0.79 | 3.44 |
| 1st-Der | 5 | 0.96 | 2.65 | 0.94 | 3.17 |
Figure 5The SERS of thiabendazole pesticide solution in rape: (a) 10 mg/L; (b) 5 mg/L; (c) 1 mg/L; (d) 0.5 mg/L; (e) 0.1 mg/L; (f) 0.05 mg/L.
Figure 6SERS spectra of different concentrations of thiabendazole pesticides in rape.
Figure 7The pretreated spectra after the 1st-Der.
Figure 8Scatter diagram of calibration set and prediction set by 1st-Der: (a) Calibration set; (b) prediction set.
Figure 9Regression equation of different characteristic band and SERS peak intensity. (a) Regression equation at 782 cm−1; (b) Regression equation at 1007 cm−1; (c) Regression equation at 1576 cm−1.
The results between the real values and predicted values of thiabendazole pesticides in rape.
| Sample | Measured Value (mg/L) | Predicted Value (mg/L) | RSD (%) | Recovery (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.432 | 1.703 | 9.85 | 118.92 |
| 2 | 6.234 | 5.904 | 0.70 | 94.71 |
| 3 | 10.231 | 9.987 | 3.22 | 97.62 |
| 4 | 20.431 | 21.233 | 1.15 | 103.93 |
| 5 | 33.156 | 34.187 | 7.96 | 103.11 |
The t-test result between reference values and prediction values.
| Paired | Mean | Standard Deviation |
| Sig. (Two-Sided) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measured value-predicted value | 0.3726 | 0.5243 | −1.489 | 3 | 0.978 |