Literature DB >> 29616984

Effectiveness of different rescanning techniques for scanned proton radiotherapy in lung cancer patients.

E Engwall1, L Glimelius, E Hynning.   

Abstract

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a tumour type thought to be well-suited for proton radiotherapy. However, the lung region poses many problems related to organ motion and can for actively scanned beams induce severe interplay effects. In this study we investigate four mitigating rescanning techniques: (1) volumetric rescanning, (2) layered rescanning, (3) breath-sampled (BS) layered rescanning, and (4) continuous breath-sampled (CBS) layered rescanning. The breath-sampled methods will spread the layer rescans over a full breathing cycle, resulting in an improved averaging effect at the expense of longer treatment times. In CBS, we aim at further improving the averaging by delivering as many rescans as possible within one breathing cycle. The interplay effect was evaluated for 4D robustly optimized treatment plans (with and without rescanning) for seven NSCLC patients in the treatment planning system RayStation. The optimization and final dose calculation used a Monte Carlo dose engine to account for the density heterogeneities in the lung region. A realistic treatment delivery time structure given from the IBA ScanAlgo simulation tool served as basis for the interplay evaluation. Both slow (2.0 s) and fast (0.1 s) energy switching times were simulated. For all seven studied patients, rescanning improves the dose conformity to the target. The general trend is that the breath-sampled techniques are superior to layered and volumetric rescanning with respect to both target coverage and variability in dose to OARs. The spacing between rescans in our breath-sampled techniques is set at planning, based on the average breathing cycle length obtained in conjunction with CT acquisition. For moderately varied breathing cycle lengths between planning and delivery (up to 15%), the breath-sampled techniques still mitigate the interplay effect well. This shows the potential for smooth implementation at the clinic without additional motion monitoring equipment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29616984     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aabb7b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  12 in total

1.  Mitigation of the Interplay Effects of Combining 4D Robust With Layer Repainting Techniques in Proton-Based SBRT for Patients With Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Long Wei; Haijiao Shang; Fu Jin; Yuenan Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) Using Spot-Scanning Proton Arc (SPArc) Therapy: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Gang Liu; Lewei Zhao; An Qin; Inga Grills; Rohan Deraniyagala; Craig Stevens; Sheng Zhang; Di Yan; Xiaoqiang Li; Xuanfeng Ding
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Is an analytical dose engine sufficient for intensity modulated proton therapy in lung cancer?

Authors:  Suliana Teoh; Francesca Fiorini; Ben George; Katherine A Vallis; Frank Van den Heuvel
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 4.  Physics of Particle Beam and Hypofractionated Beam Delivery in NSCLC.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Clemens Grassberger; Gregory C Sharp
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 5.421

5.  The Potential Role of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy in Hepatic Carcinoma in Mitigating the Risk of Dose De-Escalation.

Authors:  Luca Cozzi; Tiziana Comito; Mauro Loi; Antonella Fogliata; Ciro Franzese; Davide Franceschini; Elena Clerici; Giacomo Reggiori; Stefano Tomatis; Marta Scorsetti
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

6.  Investigating volumetric repainting to mitigate interplay effect on 4D robustly optimized lung cancer plans in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.

Authors:  Suresh Rana; Anatoly B Rosenfeld
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Proton vs photon: A model-based approach to patient selection for reduction of cardiac toxicity in locally advanced lung cancer.

Authors:  S Teoh; F Fiorini; B George; K A Vallis; F Van den Heuvel
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 6.901

8.  Technical Note: Multiple energy extraction techniques for synchrotron-based proton delivery systems may exacerbate motion interplay effects in lung cancer treatments.

Authors:  James E Younkin; Danairis Hernandez Morales; Jiajian Shen; Xiaoning Ding; Joshua B Stoker; Nathan Y Yu; Terence T Sio; Thomas B Daniels; Martin Bues; Mirek Fatyga; Steven E Schild; Wei Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.506

9.  Pro-con of proton: Dosimetric advantages of intensity-modulation over passive scatter for thoracic malignancies.

Authors:  Ang Wei Jie; Laure Marignol
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-09-07

10.  Impact of magnetic field regulation in conjunction with the volumetric repainting technique on the spot positions and beam range in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.

Authors:  Suresh Rana; Jaafar Bennouna; Alonso N Gutierrez; Anatoly B Rosenfeld
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.