Literature DB >> 29616828

Zinc binding groups for histone deacetylase inhibitors.

Lei Zhang1, Jian Zhang1, Qixiao Jiang2, Li Zhang2, Weiguo Song1.   

Abstract

Zinc binding groups (ZBGs) play a crucial role in targeting histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACIs) to the active site of histone deacetylases (HDACs), thus determining the potency of HDACIs. Due to the high affinity to the zinc ion, hydroxamic acid is the most commonly used ZBG in the structure of HDACs. An alternative ZBG is benzamide group, which features excellent inhibitory selectivity for class I HDACs. Various ZBGs have been designed and tested to improve the activity and selectivity of HDACIs, and to overcome the pharmacokinetic limitations of current HDACIs. Herein, different kinds of ZBGs are reviewed and their features have been discussed for further design of HDACIs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Histone deacetylase inhibitor; anti-tumour; drug design; selectivity; zinc binding group

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29616828      PMCID: PMC6009916          DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2017.1417274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem        ISSN: 1475-6366            Impact factor:   5.051


Introduction

Histone deacetylases are a family of enzymes that are responsible for removing acetyl groups from the ɛ-N-acetyl group of histone lysine residues. A total of 18 different isoforms of HDACs (which are classified into four classes) have been discovered. Class I (HDAC1, 2, 3, and 8), II (HDAC4–7, 9, and 10), and IV (HDAC11). HDACs are zinc-dependent enzymes which require the zinc ion for the catalytic reaction. On the other hand, class III HDACs (Sirt1–7) are a group of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+)-dependent enzymes. Enzymes in class I and II are known as classical HDACs, which attracted enormous attentions in the HDAC function exploration and inhibitor development. Overexpression and aberrant recruitment of HDACs play crucial roles in a variety of diseases such as neurodegenerative diseases,, infection,, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), cardiac diseases,, and especially tumour. Inhibitors of HDACs have received considerable attention, in particular due to their potential as antitumor agents. Four HDAC inhibitors (HDACIs) have been approved by US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of cancer (Figure 1). Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA)/Vorinostat (Zolinza) was approved in 2006 for the treatment of refractory and relapsed Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). The cyclic tetrapeptide HDACI, FK228/Romidepsin (Istodax), was also approved for treatment of CTCL. PDX101/Belinostat (Beleodaq) and LBH589/Panobinostat (Farydak) were approved for the treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) and multiple myeloma, respectively (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

Structures of HDACIs approved by the US FDA.

Structures of HDACIs approved by the US FDA. Structures of HDACIs are generally characterised by a zinc binding group (ZBG), a cap, and a linker that combines the above two parts together (Figure 2). The cap and linker bind to residues in the active site of HDACs, thus contribute to the ligand–receptor interactions and affect the selectivity of HDACIs. Meanwhile, binding of ZBGs to the zinc ion and surrounding residues play the decisive role in the inhibitory activity of HDACIs. Although different ZBGs have been evaluated and reported, modifications in the cap and linker still received more attention in the development of potent and selective HDACIs. Structural modification in the ZBGs of current HDACIs might be a more efficient way of getting HDACIs to the market. In consideration of the importance of ZBGs as functional moieties in the structure of HDACIs, different kinds of ZBGs as well as their advantages and disadvantages are systematically reviewed in the present work.
Figure 2.

Pharmacophore of HDACIs.

Pharmacophore of HDACIs.

Classic ZBGs

The commonly used ZBGs, such as hydroxamic acid and benzamide, along with other ZBGs from HDACIs that had been approved by FDA or currently being investigated in clinical trials (such as carboxylic acid and thiol), are classified as classic ZBGs. These ZBGs have been widely accepted in the development of HDACIs, and their characteristics have been extensively studied. The classic ZBGs are characterised by high activity, selectivity, but also off-target effects, potential toxicities and instability in vivo.

Hydroxamic acid

Hydroxamic acid is the most commonly used ZBG for its strong binding affinity with the zinc ion. By analysis of the crystal structure of the inhibitor–receptor complex, it was elucidated that hydroxamic acid binds to the zinc ion in a chelating manner (Figure 3), which is considered as a guarantee of inhibitor activity. The naturally derived compound Trichostatin A (TSA), which showed very high HDAC inhibitory and antiproliferative activities, was equipped with hydroxamic acid as ZBG. The first HDAC inhibitor approved by the FDA, SAHA, also utilised the hydroxamic acid as the ZBG. Moreover, most HDACIs currently in clinical trials shared structural similarities with TSA and SAHA, using the hydroxamic acid as ZBGs.
Figure 3.

The binding pattern of TSA in the active site of HDAC8 (PDB entry: 1T64).

The binding pattern of TSA in the active site of HDAC8 (PDB entry: 1T64). The advantages of hydroxamic acid group as ZBG include superior zinc binding ability, fair in vitro stability, good solubility, and easy synthesis. Therefore, in most cases, this group was the preferred ZBG in the design of new HDACIs. Various groups have been designed to mimic the hydroxamic acid group, but few exhibited higher potency. The disadvantages of hydroxamic acid group as ZBG in HDACIs are also obvious. The selectivity of hydroxamic acid group is often questioned in the drug design, because of its high binding affinity to the zinc and other ions. Undesirable side effects can also result from the binding of hydroxamic acid group to other zinc-dependent enzymes such as aminopeptidases, matrix metalloproteinases, and carbonic anhydrase. The common approaches to improve the selectivity of HDACIs with hydroxamic acid group are structural modifications in the linker and cap regions. Poor pharmacokinetics (rapid degradation and clearance in vivo) were also associated with HDACIs with hydroxamic acid as ZBG.

Benzamide

Benzamide derivatives are a big class of HDACIs with superior class I selectivity compared with hydroxamic acid HDACIs. The crystal structure analysis revealed chelation of the zinc ion by the amino group in the benzamide. Additionally, the distance between the carbonyl oxygen and zinc is more than 2.5 Å, indicating weak interactions. Chidamide (Epidaza) is a benzamide HDACI approved by Chinese Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) for the treatment of relapsed or refractory PTCL (Figure 4). MS-275 (HDAC1 selective) and MGCD0103 (HDAC1, 2 selective) are two benzamide HDACIs designed for the treatment of both hematologic malignancies and solid cancers, which are currently in clinical trial as mono therapies or in combination with other drugs. Good performances in clinical trials were also observed for another benzamide derivative, CI994.
Figure 4.

Structures of the benzamide HDACIs.

Structures of the benzamide HDACIs. The most significant feature of benzamide as ZBG in HDACIs is class I selectivity or individual HDAC isoform selectivity. Side effects of HDACIs are supposed to be reduced with the improvement of selectivity. The highly selective HDACIs could also serve as probe molecules in the diagnosis and pathogenetic research of diseases involving only a specific isoform of HDACs. The major disadvantage of benzamide derivatives is relatively compromised therapeutic benefits in clinical trials, which might explain the fact that, none of the benzamide HDACIs has been approved by the US FDA yet. Although high selectivity implies safety in clinical application, the exposed amino group in the benzamide structure could potentially induce in vivo toxicity. Furthermore, tumour cells are more likely to develop drug resistance against highly selective inhibitors, which might compromise the therapeutic effects of benzamide HDACIs in long-term therapies.

Carboxylic acid

Carboxylic acid derivatives are a small group of HDACIs. Due to their weak zinc ion binding abilities, carboxylic acid HDACIs have not attracted as much attention as HDACIs with hydroxamic acid or benzamide ZBGs. The short chain fatty acids in clinical trials, such as valproic acid,, butyric acid, and phenylbutyrate, only exhibited IC50 in the magnitude of mM, as revealed by the in vitro enzymatic inhibitory assay (Figure 5). Nonetheless, the marketing potential of compounds in this group is still under evaluation. Current activity data derived from the clinical trials indicated the potential of application of these fatty acids in tumour treatment.
Figure 5.

Carboxylic HDACIs in clinical trials.

Carboxylic HDACIs in clinical trials.

Thiols

Thiol group is commonly used for metal binding in the drug design, with the most famous example of Captopril. The first natural HDACI approved by US FDA, FK228, was regarded as a pro-drug, which can be metabolised to its active form via glutathione conjugation. The thiol group exposed in this process was supposed to chelate the zinc ion. Many thiol derivatives have been reported by structural modification of SAHA and potent natural products or by de novo design. However, none of them has been gained access to the clinical research so far. Since sulfydryl group is a strong ZBG which makes few contributions to the selectivity of HDACIs, the selectivity can be adjusted by structural modifications in the linkers and caps of HDACIs. Introduction of thiol group to HDACIs also increases the risk of side effects caused by binding to other metal-dependent targets in vivo.

Novel ZBGs

Since classic ZBGs possess both obvious advantages and disadvantages, efforts have been made in discovery of more ideal ZBGs for HDACIs. Classes of HDACIs with novel ZBGs featured with high selectivity, potency, and stability have been designed and synthesised. Although none of the HDACIs with novel ZBG has gained access to clinical trial currently, such investigations guaranteed the rise of new generations of HDACIs with improved pharmacological and pharmacokinetic profiles. An imidazole thione containing molecule (12), which showed HDAC8 selectivity over HDAC1 and HDAC3, was discovered by an enzyme based screening approach (Figure 6). The imidazole thione group supposedly could bind to the zinc ion, thus could serve as a candidate ZBG for the further design of selective HDACIs. Molecules with pyrimido[1,2-c][1,3]benzothiazin-6-imine scaffold were also discovered to selectively target HDAC8.
Figure 6.

HDACIs with novel ZBGs.

HDACIs with novel ZBGs. A series of tropolone derivatives were reported by Wright and co-workers as HDAC2 selective inhibitors. Molecule 13 displayed high levels of selectivity for HDAC2 (K = 0.06 nM) comparing with HDAC1 (not active), HDAC4 (K = 10860 nM), HDAC5 (not active), HDAC6 (not active), and HDAC8 (K = 1.47 nM). It can also potently inhibit the growth of several tumour cell lines in the antiproliferative assay. In the molecular docking analysis, simulation results revealed that the tropolone group is capable of zinc ion binding. These investigations into tropolone-based HDACIs could give rise to a new chemotype of HDACIs with high potency and selectivity. Oyelere and co-workers identified 3-hydroxypyridin-2-thione (3-HPT) as a novel ZBG, and the 3-HPT derivatives were HDAC6 selective inhibitors with no inhibition of HDAC1. In this series, molecule 14 exhibited HDAC6 selectivity with inhibitory IC50 value of 300 nM compared with HDAC8 (IC50 value of 3100 nM). Docking studies revealed that the 3-HPT group functions as ZBG. It is valuable for the 3-HPT derivatives in the development of specifically selective HDACIs for the treatment of tumour and other diseases without interference with HDAC1. Several hydroxamic acid substitutes have been designed and synthesised as ZBGs by Attenni and co-workers, and the inhibitory activities were evaluated. Primary amide containing molecules exhibited good performance in the enzymatic inhibition and antitumor assays. Molecule 15 with primary carboxamide moiety functioned as ZBG showed selective inhibitory pattern for HDAC1, and demonstrated antitumor efficacy in a xenograft model comparable to vorinostat. These findings revealed that primary carboxamide group could be used as an alternative ZBG for further HDACI design. Chelidamic derivatives have been reported as novel HDACIs by Mai and co-workers. Molecules with chelidamic scaffold represented as the zinc binding group (16) exhibited inhibitory effects on both HDAC1 and HDAC4. Multiple analyses, including cell cycle analysis, apoptosis induction, and granulocytic differentiation analysis, have revealed that the representative molecules have the potential to serve as leading compounds in the cancer treatment. Chelidamic group as ZBG is considered as a promising candidate in the development of selective HDACIs by further structural modification. Liao and co-workers discovered a class of HDACIs with benzoylhydrazide scaffold as the ZBGs. Molecule 17 exhibited class I selectivity, especially effective against HDAC3 (IC50 value of 0.06 μM). Subsequent in vitro assays with molecule 17 revealed potent anti-proliferative activities along with less overt cytotoxicity comparing with both SAHA and MS-275. Other in vitro evaluations emphasised the potential of benzoylhydrazide as new chemotype of HDACIs as well. Recently, Chou and co-workers also reported a series of hydrazide derivatives as potent class I HDACIs. The SAR (structure–activity relationship) analysis revealed that a 3-carbon-length β-nitrogen alkyl substituent chain provides ideal activity. One of the most potent molecule, 18, exhibited HDAC3 inhibitory activity of 0.95 nM (IC50 value), and EC50 values of 36.37, 76.64, and 151.7 nM against MV4–11, Molm14, and RS4–11 cell lines, respectively. HDACIs with hydrazide motif are of significant importance as a new generation. Without the dependence on the zinc binding interactions, these molecules are supposed to exert less off-target effects. Moreover, the reported hydrazide derivatives showed class I selectivity (especially HDAC3), indicating the potential of successful disease treatment without serious adverse reactions. However, long-term use safety is yet to be confirmed for those HDACIs with hydrazide group. A distinct class of HDACIs using trifluoromethyloxadiazolyl (TFMO) moiety as ZBG was reported by Nolan and co-workers. Binding patterns of these molecules were elucidated to be a non-chelating manner by crystallographic approaches. Zinc binding of TFMO derivatives is mediated by a fluorine atom in the trifluoromethyl group and aided by an oxygen atom in the oxadiazole heterocycle. In the enzymatic inhibition assay, these TFMO containing HDACIs exhibited high selectivity for HDAC class IIa. Molecule 19 displayed K values of 0.126, 0.080, 0.036, and 0.019 μM against HDAC4, 5, 7, and 9, respectively. In contrast, the K values of molecule 19 against HDAC6, HDAC8, and the rest HDACs (HDAC1, 2, 3, 10, 11) are 2.32, 3.57, and >10 μM, respectively. These class IIa selective HDACIs were further utilised to reveal the gene regulation mechanisms of class IIa HDACs. The discovery of TFMO-based HDACIs supports the design of selective HDACIs being of importance in treatment of a specific disease, and exploration of underlying mechanisms as probe molecules. Woster and co-workers reported the 2-(oxazol-2-yl)phenol moiety as a novel ZBG that can be used for the design of potent HDACIs. A series of 2-(oxazol-2-yl)phenol derivatives were synthesised and tested in the activity assay. The derived molecules exhibited potent HDAC1, HDAC6 and HDAC10 inhibitory activities. Among these compounds, molecule 20 (IC50 7.5 μM against MV-4–11 leukemia cell line) could efficiently induce the acetylation of histone 3 lysine 9 (H3K9) and p21Waf1/CIP1 compared with SAHA. Molecular modelling analysis revealed that 2-(oxazol-2-yl)phenol group shows a similar zinc-binding pattern as the benzamide group in the ligand of a crystal structure (PDB entry: 4LY1). Although no remarkable selectivity was observed, the 2-(oxazol-2-yl)phenol derivatives are considered promising candidates as ZBG in the development of novel and potent HDAC inhibitory drugs. Hydroxypyrimidines (21) without contribution to the selectivity of HDACs were discovered to be a new ZBG. The hydroxyl group and the pyrimidine group in the ZBG are both critical for activity, as revealed by SAR studies. Park and co-workers have identified N-[1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl and N-thiazol-2-yl sulfonamide groups as promising ZBG (21) with probably better physicochemical properties than hydroxamic acids, as demonstrated by the clinical studies. The oxygen atoms of the sulfonamide group and the nitrogen atom of the thiadiazol or thiazol rings were predicted to bind to the zinc ion as revealed by the molecular modelling studies. Dallavallea and co-worker reported phenyl-4-yl-acrylohydroxamic acid derivatives as potent HDACIs with cinnamic-based hydrazones and amino or hydroxyureas as ZBGs (23). In the activity studies, the derived molecules were discovered to be less effective than the parent hydroxamic acid derivatives. Wu and co-worker designed HDAC2 selective inhibitor β-hydroxymethyl chalcone (24), which exhibited about 20-fold isoform selectivity of HDAC2 (IC50 0.17 μM) over HDAC1 (IC50 2.74 μM). A reaction-mechanism-based pattern was proposed in the binding of the derived inhibitor to zinc ion by intramolecular cyclisation which was catalysed by the zinc atom. Selectivity is considered to play important role in the safety and potency of HDACIs. The novel ZBGs not only functioned as zinc chelators in the structures of HDACIs, but also can influence the selectivity of the enclosed molecules. The imidazole thione and pyrimido[1,2-c][1,3]benzothiazin-6-imine derivatives exhibited inhibitory selectivity of HDAC8, which is implicated in cancer, schistosomiasis, and Cornelia de Lange syndrome. The tropolone derivatives can selectively inhibit the bioactivity of both HDAC2 and HDAC8. The primary amide derivatives showed inhibitory selectivity of HDAC1, and the 3-HPT derivatives exhibited selectivity of HDAC6 over HDAC1. The chelidamic and hydrazide containing HDACIs featured selectivity of HDAC1, 4, and HDAC3, respectively. Two chemotypes of HDACIs even exhibited group-specific inhibitory selectivity of HDACs, such as the TFMO (with selectivity of class IIa HDACs) and 2-(oxazol-2-yl)phenol (with selectivity of HDAC1, 6, and 10) derivatives. The mentioned ZBGs can be applied to the design of HDACIs for the treatment of diseases or mechanistic studies by targeting a specific HDAC isoform or a specific group of HDACs.

Conclusion and discussion

Inhibition of HDACs has achieved rapid development in recent years, and HDACIs have exhibited enormous therapeutic potential in the treatment of cancer and other diseases. More than 15 HDACIs have been investigated in clinical trials, and four of them have gained approval from the US FDA. As targeted antitumor drugs, the efficacy and safety of HDACIs in tumour treatment had been confirmed. Therefore, development of HDACIs has attracted extreme attentions in the field of drug discovery. However, current development efforts focused on structural reorganisation and modification in the cap and linker motifs, while the ZBGs did not receive much attention, the classical ZBGs such as hydroxamic acid and benzamide groups were usually directly adopted into the new compounds. Hydroxamic acid group is widely used as ZBGs due to its high zinc chelating ability, and benzamide is chosen for its class I HDACs selectivity. The application of carboxylic acid and thiol groups were limited by the lack of potency and only found in a small group of HDACIs. The potency and safety of HDACIs with the above ZBGs have been evaluated by various studies including different stages of clinical trials. Discovery of HDACIs with classic ZBGs, and especially the hydroxamic acid and benzamide derivatives, plays significant roles in the drug development by the inhibition of HDACs. Substituting the hydroxamic acid and benzamide groups with other groups usually resulted in reduction of activities comparing to the current highly active HDACIs. Moreover, the HDACIs designed with novel ZBGs from the beginning also have difficulties to show improved activities than those with the classical hydroxamic acid group. In spite of the difficulties mentioned above, introduction of novel ZBGs is still necessary for the development of HDACIs of new chemotypes so that the pharmacokinetic and safety issues of current agents could be improved. Significant achievements have been gained in the development of HDACIs with novel ZBGs. Many have exhibited superior selectivity, such as the tropolone, 3-HPT, and TFMO derivatives. Some molecules also displayed surprisingly high potency in the activity assay, such as the hydrazide HDACIs discovered by Chou and co-worker (exhibited enzyme inhibitory activity with IC50 in the pM range and antiproliferative activity with IC50 in the nM range). Although none of the HDACIs with novel ZBGs has been approved by FDA or even gained access to the clinical trials, the future of these HDACIs as new generations is promising. The encouraging outcomes of these investigations also guaranteed further explorations on new ZBGs in HDACI development. Wide application of novel ZBGs in the HDACIs design will contribute to the emergence of new HDACIs.

Perspectives

Zinc binding groups play significant role in the potency of HDACIs. The wide application of current ZBGs is restricted by the poor pharmacokinetics or selectivity. Thus, it is necessary to develop new types of ZBGs for the design of HDACIs with improved druggability. In order to be selected in the design of HDACIs, the new types of ZBGs should exhibit advantages in potency, selectivity, pharmacokinetics, or safety compared with the classic ZBGs. However, it is still a challenge for the new designed ZBGs to show better performance than the classic ZBGs in the design of HDACIs. Therefore, a vast amount of further research work is needed in the discovery of novel ZBGs with exploitable value. Structural derivatisation of current ZBGs, such as hydroxamic acid and benzamide groups, is believed to be an effective way of rapid discovery of ZBGs with development potential. Novel ZBGs can be efficiently derived by computing methods, reference to or modification of natural structures, screening of molecular data base, isostere substitution, and de novo design. Study on the metabolic patterns of current ZBGs also provides valuable information for the design of new ZBGs.
  59 in total

1.  Identification of novel isoform-selective inhibitors within class I histone deacetylases.

Authors:  Erding Hu; Edward Dul; Chiu-Mei Sung; Zunxuan Chen; Robert Kirkpatrick; Gui-Feng Zhang; Kyung Johanson; Ronggang Liu; Amparo Lago; Glenn Hofmann; Ricardo Macarron; Maite de los Frailes; Paloma Perez; John Krawiec; James Winkler; Michael Jaye
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 4.030

2.  Tropolones as lead-like natural products: the development of potent and selective histone deacetylase inhibitors.

Authors:  Sophia N Ononye; Michael D VanHeyst; E Zachary Oblak; Wangda Zhou; Mohamed Ammar; Amy C Anderson; Dennis L Wright
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 4.345

3.  A class of hybrid polar inducers of transformed cell differentiation inhibits histone deacetylases.

Authors:  V M Richon; S Emiliani; E Verdin; Y Webb; R Breslow; R A Rifkind; P A Marks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A Phase 2 Study of Concurrent Radiation Therapy, Temozolomide, and the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Valproic Acid for Patients With Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Andra V Krauze; Sten D Myrehaug; Michael G Chang; Diane J Holdford; Sharon Smith; Joanna Shih; Philip J Tofilon; Howard A Fine; Kevin Camphausen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 5.  Histone deacetylase inhibitors and HIV latency.

Authors:  David M Margolis
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.283

6.  Selective class IIa histone deacetylase inhibition via a nonchelating zinc-binding group.

Authors:  Mercedes Lobera; Kevin P Madauss; Denise T Pohlhaus; Quentin G Wright; Mark Trocha; Darby R Schmidt; Erkan Baloglu; Ryan P Trump; Martha S Head; Glenn A Hofmann; Monique Murray-Thompson; Benjamin Schwartz; Subhas Chakravorty; Zining Wu; Palwinder K Mander; Laurens Kruidenier; Robert A Reid; William Burkhart; Brandon J Turunen; James X Rong; Craig Wagner; Mary B Moyer; Carrow Wells; Xuan Hong; John T Moore; Jon D Williams; Dulce Soler; Shomir Ghosh; Michael A Nolan
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 15.040

7.  Phase 1 study of the oral isotype specific histone deacetylase inhibitor MGCD0103 in leukemia.

Authors:  Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Sarit Assouline; Jorge Cortes; Zeev Estrov; Hagop Kantarjian; Hui Yang; Willie M Newsome; Wilson H Miller; Caroline Rousseau; Ann Kalita; Claire Bonfils; Marja Dubay; Tracy-Ann Patterson; Zuomei Li; Jeffrey M Besterman; Gregory Reid; Eric Laille; Robert E Martell; Mark Minden
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Histone deacetylase inhibitors with a primary amide zinc binding group display antitumor activity in xenograft model.

Authors:  Barbara Attenni; Jesus M Ontoria; Jonathan C Cruz; Michael Rowley; Carsten Schultz-Fademrecht; Christian Steinkühler; Philip Jones
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 9.  Histone deacetylase inhibitors in the treatment of cancer: overview and perspectives.

Authors:  Giuseppe Giannini; Walter Cabri; Caterina Fattorusso; Manuela Rodriquez
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.808

10.  Preclinical antitumor activity of ST7612AA1: a new oral thiol-based histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor.

Authors:  Loredana Vesci; Elena Bernasconi; Ferdinando Maria Milazzo; Rita De Santis; Eugenio Gaudio; Ivo Kwee; Andrea Rinaldi; Silvia Pace; Valeria Carollo; Giuseppe Giannini; Francesco Bertoni
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-03-20
View more
  37 in total

Review 1.  Uncovering epigenetic landscape: a new path for biomarkers identification and drug development.

Authors:  Daiane Teixeira de Oliveira; Renata Guerra-Sá
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Discovery of novel N-substituted thiazolidinediones (TZDs) as HDAC8 inhibitors: in-silico studies, synthesis, and biological evaluation.

Authors:  Neha Upadhyay; Kalpana Tilekar; Niklas Jänsch; Markus Schweipert; Jessica D Hess; Luca Henze Macias; Piotr Mrowka; Renato J Aguilera; Jun-Yong Choe; Franz-Josef Meyer-Almes; C S Ramaa
Journal:  Bioorg Chem       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 5.275

3.  Design, Synthesis and Cytotoxic Activity Evaluation of Newly Synthesized Amides-Based TMP Moiety as Potential Anticancer Agents over HepG2 Cells.

Authors:  Tarfah Al-Warhi; Adil Aldhahrani; Fayez Althobaiti; Eman Fayad; Ola A Abu Ali; Sarah Albogami; Ali H Abu Almaaty; Amgad I M Khedr; Syed Nasir Abbas Bukhari; Islam Zaki
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.927

4.  An in silico pipeline for the discovery of multitarget ligands: A case study for epi-polypharmacology based on DNMT1/HDAC2 inhibition.

Authors:  Fernando D Prieto-Martínez; Eli Fernández-de Gortari; José L Medina-Franco; L Michel Espinoza-Fonseca
Journal:  Artif Intell Life Sci       Date:  2021-09-12

5.  Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Quinazolin-4-one-Based Hydroxamic Acids as Dual PI3K/HDAC Inhibitors.

Authors:  Ashish Thakur; Gregory J Tawa; Mark J Henderson; Carina Danchik; Suiyang Liu; Pranav Shah; Amy Q Wang; Garrett Dunn; Md Kabir; Elias C Padilha; Xin Xu; Anton Simeonov; Surender Kharbanda; Richard Stone; Gurmit Grewal
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  A new class of cytotoxic agents targets tubulin and disrupts microtubule dynamics.

Authors:  Ayad A Al-Hamashi; Radhika Koranne; Samkeliso Dlamini; Abdulateef Alqahtani; Endri Karaj; Maisha S Rashid; Joseph R Knoff; Matthew Dunworth; Mary Kay H Pflum; Robert A Casero; Lalith Perera; William R Taylor; L M Viranga Tillekeratne
Journal:  Bioorg Chem       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 5.275

Review 7.  Shifting the paradigm in treating multi-factorial diseases: polypharmacological co-inhibitors of HDAC6.

Authors:  Alexandria M Chan; Steven Fletcher
Journal:  RSC Med Chem       Date:  2020-12-11

8.  Development and validation of the TGx-HDACi transcriptomic biomarker to detect histone deacetylase inhibitors in human TK6 cells.

Authors:  Eunnara Cho; Andrea Rowan-Carroll; Andrew Williams; J Christopher Corton; Heng-Hong Li; Albert J Fornace; Cheryl A Hobbs; Carole L Yauk
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 6.168

9.  Hydroxamic acid derivatives as HDAC1, HDAC6 and HDAC8 inhibitors with antiproliferative activity in cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Yudibeth Sixto-López; José Antonio Gómez-Vidal; Nuria de Pedro; Martiniano Bello; Martha Cecilia Rosales-Hernández; José Correa-Basurto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  β-Carboline-based molecular hybrids as anticancer agents: a brief sketch.

Authors:  Jay Prakash Soni; Yogesh Yeole; Nagula Shankaraiah
Journal:  RSC Med Chem       Date:  2021-03-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.