| Literature DB >> 29616214 |
Davide Slaghenaufi1, Maurizio Ugliano1.
Abstract
During wine aging, tobacco and balsamic aroma notes appear. In this paper, volatile compounds directly or potentially related to those aromas have been investigated in Corvina and Corvinone wines during aging. Corvina and Corvinone are two northern-Italy autochthonous red grape varieties, used to produce Valpolicella Classico and Amarone wines, both characterized by tobacco and balsamic aroma notes. Wines were analyzed shortly after bottling or following model aging at 60°C for 48, 72, and 168 h. Volatile compounds were analyzed by HS-SPME-GC-MS. Results showed that compounds related to tobacco aroma [β-damascenone, 3-oxo-α-ionol, (E)-1-(2,3,6-Trimethylphenyl)-buta-1,3-diene (TPB), and megastigmatrienones] increased in relationship to storage time with different patterns. β-Damascenone and 3-oxo-α-ionol rapidly increased to reach a plateau in the first 48-72 h of model aging. Instead, TPB and megastigmatrienones concentration showed a linear correlation with aging time. During model aging, several cyclic terpenes tended to increase. Among them 1,8-cineole and 1,4-cineole, previously reported to contribute to red wine eucalyptus notes increased proportionally to storage time, and this behavior was clearly associated with reactions involving α-terpineol, limonene, and terpinolene, as confirmed by studies with model wine solutions. Among other relevant volatile compounds, sesquiterpenes appear to contribute potentially balsamic and spicy aroma notes. In this study, linear sesquiterpenes (nerolidol, farnesol) underwent acid hydrolysis during long wine aging, while cyclic sesquiterpenes seemed to increase with time. The chemical pathways associated with evolution of some of the compounds investigated have been studied in model wine.Entities:
Keywords: 1,4-cineole; 1,8-cineole; balsamic aroma; terpenoids; tobacco aroma; wine aging
Year: 2018 PMID: 29616214 PMCID: PMC5867301 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00066
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
Retention times, retention indices, quantification ions of studied compounds.
| 1,4-Cineole | 12.1 | 1,186 | 154 | 139, 125, 111 | RS | 0.003 | 0.010 | 5.3 |
| Limonene | 12.5 | 1,198 | 136 | 121, 93 | RS | 0.03 | 0.10 | 10.1 |
| 1,8-Cineole | 13.2 | 1,217 | 154 | 139, 111, 108 | RS | 0.003 | 0.011 | 9.0 |
| γ-Terpinene | 13.6 | 1,228 | 93 | 136, 121 | LRI MS | – | – | 3.6 |
| p-Cymene | 15.1 | 1,271 | 119 | 134, 91 | RS | 0.08 | 0.24 | 7.3 |
| Terpinolene | 15.6 | 1,283 | 121 | 136, 93 | RS | 0.04 | 0.15 | 5.9 |
| cis-Linalooloxide | 21.2 | 1,437 | 59 | 111, 94 | RS | 0.02 | 0.07 | 2.8 |
| trans-Linalooloxide | 22.1 | 1,469 | 59 | 111, 94 | RS | 0.02 | 0.07 | 6.8 |
| Vitispirane 1 | 23.6 | 1,523 | 192 | 177, 93 | LRI MS | – | – | 5.2 |
| Vitispirane 2 | 23.6 | 1,524 | 192 | 177.93 | LRI MS | – | – | 6.1 |
| Linalool | 24.2 | 1,547 | 71 | 121, 93 | RS | 0.08 | 0.25 | 2.2 |
| Terpinen-1-ol | 25.1 | 1,581 | 136 | 121, 81 | LRI MS | – | – | 5.8 |
| Terpinen-4-ol | 26.0 | 1,614 | 71 | 111, 93, 86 | RS | 0.02 | 0.05 | 2.7 |
| Sesquiterpene 5 | 28.4 | 1,696 | 204 | 189, 161 | LRI MS | – | – | 12.3 |
| α-Terpineol | 28.5 | 1,701 | 136 | 121, 93, 59 | RS | 0.23 | 0.70 | 3.6 |
| Sesquiterpene 7 | 29.3 | 1,728 | 204 | 136, 121 | LRI MS | – | – | 11.8 |
| TDN | 29.7 | 1,745 | 157 | 172, 142 | LRI MS | – | – | 5.8 |
| β-Citronellol | 30.4 | 1,771 | 69 | 82, 81, 67 | RS | 0.07 | 0.21 | 2.3 |
| Nerol | 31.5 | 1,812 | 93 | 121, 84, 69 | RS | 0.2 | 0.6 | 8.9 |
| β-Damascenone | 31.8 | 1,825 | 69 | 190, 121, 105 | RS | 0.01 | 0.03 | 7.5 |
| TPB | 31.9 | 1,828 | 172 | 157, 142 | LRI MS | – | – | 15.7 |
| Geraniol | 32.7 | 1,860 | 93 | 123, 121, 69 | RS | 0.06 | 0.2 | 4.8 |
| Nerolidol 1 | 36.8 | 2,024 | 69 | 161, 136, 93 | RS | 0.015 | 0.05 | 2.5 |
| Nerolidol 2 | 37.3 | 2,045 | 69 | 161, 136, 93 | RS | 0.015 | 0.05 | 2.7 |
| p-Menthane-1,8-diol | 38.8 | 2,120 | 81 | 139, 96, 59 | RS | 350 | 1,050 | 3.3 |
| Megastigmatrienone 1 | 40.1 | 2,154 | 190 | 175, 147, 133 | RS | 0.13 | 0.40 | 8.3 |
| Megastigmatrienone 2 | 41.1 | 2,196 | 190 | 175, 147, 133 | RS | 0.37 | 1.17 | 9.9 |
| Bisabolol | 41.3 | 2,206 | 204 | 119, 109 | RS | 0.03 | 0.10 | 8.1 |
| Megastigmatrienone 3 | 42.6 | 2,255 | 190 | 175, 147, 133 | RS | 0.05 | 0.14 | 5.7 |
| Megastigmatrienone 4 | 43.3 | 2,286 | 190 | 175, 147, 133 | RS | 0.18 | 0.5 | 7.1 |
| 8-Hydroxylinalool | 43.5 | 2,292 | 71 | 137, 67 | LRI MS | – | – | 14.4 |
| Farnesol 1 | 43.7 | 2,300 | 69 | 136, 93, 81 | RS | 0.03 | 0.10 | 4.5 |
| Farnesol 2 | 44.4 | 2,327 | 69 | 136, 93, 81 | RS | 0.03 | 0.10 | 7.1 |
| 3-Oxo-α-ionol | 50.1 | 2,555 | 108 | 152 | LRI MS | – | – | 4.9 |
Linear Retention Index (LRI) were determined on DB-WAX polar column, as described by van Den Dool and Kratz (.
RS identified using reference standard; LRI MS tentatively identified by comparing the Linear Retention Index and mass spectra with those of literature.
Reference standard not available, LOD and LOQ couldn't be determined.
Aroma descriptors and occurrence in wine of potential contributors to balsamic and tobacco odor.
| 1,4-Cineole | Hay, eucalyptol like, camphoraceous (Antalick et al., | Antalick et al., |
| 1,8-Cineole | Eucalyptus, camphoraceous, cool (Fariña et al., | Hervé et al., |
| Terpinolene | Lime, pine, turpentine (Gocmen et al., | Dziadas and Jelen, |
| Vitispirane 1 | Camphor (Genovese et al., | Simpson et al., |
| Vitispirane 2 | Camphor (Genovese et al., | Simpson et al., |
| α-Terpineol | Piney (Tatum et al., | Schreier and Drawert, |
| β-Damascenone | Fruity, balsamic, tobacco (Weyerstahl et al., | Schreier and Drawert, |
| (E)-1-(2,3,6-trimethylphenyl)buta-1,3-diene (TPB) | Tobacco, floral, geranium (Janusz et al., | Janusz et al., |
| Megastigmatrienone 1 | Wood, tobacco (Weyerstahl et al., | Slaghenaufi et al., |
| Megastigmatrienone 2 | Smoky, tobacco (Weyerstahl et al., | Slaghenaufi et al., |
| Megastigmatrienone 3 | Burnt (Weyerstahl et al., | Slaghenaufi et al., |
| Megastigmatrienone 4 | Burnt, wood (Weyerstahl et al., | Slaghenaufi et al., |
| 3-Oxo-α-ionol | Tobacco (Ribéreau-Gayon et al., | Strauss et al., |
Figure 1Principal component analysis showing samples scores (A), and correlation loadings (B). Samples (scores) are labeled with their aging time (min): no aged (blue), 48 min (green), 72 min (black), 168 min (red). Loadings have been colored according to their aroma descriptor class: balsamic (blue), tobacco (red), fruity-flowery (green), petroleum (black), unknown (pink).
Figure 2Evolution of β-damascenone (A) and 3-oxo-α-ionol (B) during wine aging.
Figure 3Formation of megastigmatrienone (3) from 3-oxo-α-ionol (2) and its glucoside precursor (1) during aging.
Figure 4Evolution of the tobacco odor zone associated to TPB (A) and megastigmatrienone (sum of isomers) (B) during aging.
Figure 5Extracted ion chromatograms (m/z: 172) and mass spectra of the peak (32 min) at the 4 levels of aging, tentatively identified as TPB. Samples: Corvina A, Corvinone B.
Figure 6Evolution of terpenoids in Valpolicella wine samples during model aging.
Compounds formed in model wine by single addition of precursors and stored at 60°C for 48, 72, and 168 h (nd: not detected; + trace; ++ medium level; + + + high level).
| α | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Formed compounds | 1,8-cineole | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | nd | nd | + | nd | + | ++ | nd | nd | nd | + | + | + |
| 1,4-cineole | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | nd | nd | + | nd | + | ++ | + | + | ++ | + | + | + | |
| α-terpineol | +++ | ++ | + | +++ | ++ | + | +++ | ++ | + | + | + | ++ | + | + | ++ | nd | nd | nd | |
| terpinen-1-ol | + | + | + | nd | nd | nd | nd | + | ++ | nd | + | ++ | + | + | ++ | nd | nd | nd | |
| terpinen-4-ol | + | + | + | + | nd | nd | + | + | + | nd | nd | + | + | + | nd | + | + | + | |
| terpinolene | ++ | + | + | +++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | ++ | + | + | + | ++ | nd | + | ++ | + | + | nd | |
| limonene | + | ++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | + | +++ | ++ | + | + | + | ++ | nd | nd | nd | + | + | + | |
| α-terpinene | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | + | ++ | nd | nd | nd | |
| γ-terpinene | + | ++ | +++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | +++ | + | + | ++ | nd | + | ++ | + | + | + | |
| p-cymene | + | ++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | + | + | ++ | +++ | nd | nd | nd | + | ++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | + | |
Figure 7(A) Proposed acid catalyzed reactions involving terpenoids during aging. (B) Detail of the reaction occuring to p-menthane-1,8-diol to form 1,8-cineole or 1,4-cineole.
Figure 8Accumulation of p-cymene in Valpolicella wines during model aging.
Figure 9Extracted ion chromatogram (m/z: 204) of sesquiterpenes in Corvina A sample: (A) before aging; (B) and after 168 h of model aging.