| Literature DB >> 29616186 |
Chakrabhavi Dhananjaya Mohan1, Nirvanappa C Anilkumar2, Shobith Rangappa3, Muthu K Shanmugam4, Srishti Mishra4, Arunachalam Chinnathambi5, Sulaiman Ali Alharbi5, Atanu Bhattacharjee6, Gautam Sethi4, Alan Prem Kumar4,7, Kanchugarakoppal S Rangappa8.
Abstract
Aberrant activation of NF-κB is linked with the progression of humanEntities:
Keywords: NF-κB; anticancer; apoptosis; hepatocellular carcinoma; oxadiazoles
Year: 2018 PMID: 29616186 PMCID: PMC5867297 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00042
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Scheme 1Schematic representation for the synthesis of 1,3,4-oxadiazoles.
Library of newly synthesized 1,3,4-oxadiazoles.
| Entry | Acid hydrazide | Carboxylic acid | Oxadiazole |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | |||
| 2 | |||
| 3 | |||
| 4 | |||
| 5 | |||
| 6 | |||
| 7 | |||
| 8 | |||
| 9 | |||
| 10 |
Figure 1(A,B) CMO induces antiproliferative effect in time- and dose-dependent manner. HepG2 and HCCLM3 cells were plated in triplicate, treated with indicated concentrations of CMO, and then subjected to MTT assay after 24, 48, and 72 h to analyze proliferation of cells. The data are expressed as mean ± SD, compared with the untreated control (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).
Figure 2(A,B) CMO induces accumulation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells in SubG1 phase. HepG2 and HCCLM3 cells were treated with 50 µM of CMO for 24, 48, and 72 h, after which, the cells were washed, fixed, stained with propidium iodide, and subjected to flow cytometric analysis. (C,D) CMO induces substantial apoptosis in HCC cells. HepG2 and HCCLM3 cells were exposed to 50 µM CMO at indicated times, after which, cells were harvested and stained with Annexin V and propidium iodide. The percentage of early and late apoptosis in the HCC cells treated with 50 µM CMO was examined using flow cytometry. The bar graph shows total percentage of apoptotic cells of HepG2 and HCCLM3 upon treatment with 50 µM of CMO at the indicated time points. The data are expressed as mean ± SD, compared with the untreated control (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).
Figure 3(A,B) CMO inhibits the phosphorylation of IκB and depletes the nuclear pool of p65 in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. HepG2 cells were treated with 25 µM CMO for indicated time point, after which, the cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts were prepared, and protein was resolved on SDS-PAGE gel, electrotransferred onto nitrocellulose membranes, and probed for phospho-IκB, IκB, phospho-p65, p65, GAPDH, and Lamin B antibodies.
Figure 4(A) The effect of CMO on constitutive NF-κB DNA-binding activity. HepG2 cells (5 × 105/ml) and HCCLM3 cells (5 × 105/ml) were treated with CMO for 4, 8, and 12 h. Nuclear extracts were prepared, 50 µg of the nuclear extract protein was taken for DNA-binding assay as described in Section “Materials and Methods.” (B,C) CMO inhibits constitutive activation of reporter gene expression. HepG2 (5 × 105/ml) and HCCLM3 (5 × 105/ml) cells were transfected with NF-κB luciferase and β-galactosidase reporter plasmid using lipofectamine, incubated for 24 h, and then treated with CMO for 4, 8, and 12 h. Cells were lysed in reporter lysis buffer and analyzed for luciferase activity and normalized with β-galactosidase activity. Results are expressed as % fold activity over the activity of vector control. *p < 0.05.
Figure 5(A) Knockdown of p65 by small interfering RNA (siRNA) reduces the apoptotic effect of CMO. HepG2 cells were transfected with either control or p65 specific siRNA (50 nM). After 48 h, the cells were treated with CMO (25 or 50 µM) for 24 h, and the enzymatic activity of caspase-3/7 was determined by Caspase-Glo® 3/7 assay kit. (B) CMO increases the cleavage of PARP and Caspase 3 in HCCLM3 cells. HCCLM3 cells were treated with 50 µM CMO for 12, 24, 36, and 48 h, after which, the whole-cell extracts were prepared, and 30 µg of protein was resolved on 12% SDS-PAGE gel, electrotransferred onto nitrocellulose membranes, and probed for cleaved PARP and cleaved caspase 3 antibodies. The data are expressed as mean ± SD, compared with the untreated control (*p < 0.05).
Figure 6In silico molecular interactions between p65 of NF-κB complex and the oxadiazole derivatives: (A) hydrophobic region of p65 was shown as green mass; (B) surface view of CMO bound p65 with the key amino acids (labeled); (C) interaction map and hydrogen bonding (dotted line) pattern of p65 protein with CMO.
Molecular docking results of p65 with oxadiazoles.
| Entry | LS1 | LS2 | -PLP1 | -PLP2 | JAIN | -PMF | DS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.26 | 5.49 | 91.7 | 82.35 | 0.23 | 54.81 | 54.86 |
| 2 | 2.19 | 5.31 | 90.55 | 83.5 | 0.37 | 52.69 | 53.72 |
| 3 | 2.23 | 5.40 | 91.14 | 85.13 | 0.34 | 53.51 | 53.98 |
| 4 | 2.96 | 5.94 | 86.94 | 81.35 | 2.02 | 51.45 | 56.80 |
| 5 | 3.60 | 5.68 | 95.92 | 85.44 | 0.09 | 56.92 | 58.38 |
| 6 | 2.70 | 5.72 | 78.03 | 71.04 | 0.46 | 48.53 | 51.54 |
| 7 | 2.70 | 5.47 | 77.54 | 71.31 | 0.35 | 50.87 | 50.72 |
| 8 | 2.42 | 5.59 | 78.85 | 74.85 | 0.48 | 50.49 | 52.58 |
| 9 | 5.29 | 5.77 | 80.3 | 75.22 | 1.6 | 29.64 | 56.64 |
| 10 | 4.00 | 6.26 | 84.55 | 74.9 | 2.85 | 46.21 | 61.00 |
LS1 and LS2: LigScore1 and 2 are a fast, simple, scoring function for predicting protein–ligand binding affinities.
PLP1 and PLP2, piecewise linear potentials 1 and 2 are fast, simple, docking function that has been shown to correlate well with protein–ligand binding affinities.
JAIN, an empirical scoring function (lipophilic, polar attractive, and polar repulsive interactions, solvation of the protein and ligand, and an entropy term for the ligand) through an evaluation of the structures and binding affinities of a series of protein–ligand complexes.
PMF, potential of mean force is the scoring function developed based on statistical analysis of the 3D structures of protein–ligand complexes.
DS, Dock Score, ligand poses are evaluated and prioritized according to the Dock Score function.