Literature DB >> 29616121

Three-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted imaging in the differentiation of incidental prostate carcinoma from benign prostate hyperplasia.

Xue-Qin Zhang1, Xiang-Rong Yu2, Zhong-Li Du2, Xiao-Fen Miao1, Jian Lu1, Quan Zhou3.   

Abstract

The present study evaluated three-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) features in differentiating incidental prostate carcinoma (IPCa) and benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) in the central gland of the prostate. The clinical and imaging data of 9 patients with IPCa, 118 patients with BPH [including those with glandular hyperplasia (GH), stromal hyperplasia (SH) and mixed hyperplasia (MH)], were retrospectively analyzed. The mean (choline + creatine)/citrate (CC/C) value of 3D MRS, the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and the minimal ADC value of DWI were compared between carcinoma and non-carcinoma tissues. The mean CC/C values were 1.04±0.28, and 1.09±0.58 in IPCa and BPH, respectively (t=-0.205, P=0.838). No significant difference in CC/C values (χ2=2.595, P=0.458) could be detected between IPCa, GH, SH and MH groups. The ADC values of the central gland only differed between IPCa (1.48±0.18) ×10-3 and GH (1.60±0.16) ×10-3 mm2/sec (P=0.037). The minimal ADC values were similar between IPCa (1.15±0.10) ×10-3 and BPH (1.14±0.11) ×10-3 mm2/sec, no significant differences could be detected between IPCa and GH (P=0.930), IPCa and SH (P=0.192), and IPCa and MH (P=0.544). Although the ADC values of the central gland of the prostate differed between IPCa and GH, the findings of the present study therefore indicate that combining 3D MRS with DWI cannot potentially improve the detection of IPCa.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diffusion-weighted imaging; incidental prostate carcinoma; magnetic resonance imaging; magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Year:  2018        PMID: 29616121      PMCID: PMC5876421          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.8131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  31 in total

1.  Comparison of quantitative T2 mapping and diffusion-weighted imaging in the normal and pathologic prostate.

Authors:  P Gibbs; D J Tozer; G P Liney; L W Turnbull
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging.

Authors:  Caroline M A Hoeks; Jelle O Barentsz; Thomas Hambrock; Derya Yakar; Diederik M Somford; Stijn W T P J Heijmink; Tom W J Scheenen; Pieter C Vos; Henkjan Huisman; Inge M van Oort; J Alfred Witjes; Arend Heerschap; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Differentiation of noncancerous tissue and cancer lesions by apparent diffusion coefficient values in transition and peripheral zones of the prostate.

Authors:  Chiho Sato; Shinji Naganawa; Tatsuya Nakamura; Hisashi Kumada; Shunichi Miura; Osamu Takizawa; Takeo Ishigaki
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Transition zone prostate cancers: features, detection, localization, and staging at endorectal MR imaging.

Authors:  Oguz Akin; Evis Sala; Chaya S Moskowitz; Kentaro Kuroiwa; Nicole M Ishill; Darko Pucar; Peter T Scardino; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Outcome of radical prostatectomy for incidental carcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  Sebastian Melchior; Boris Hadaschik; Sebastian Thüroff; Christian Thomas; Rolf Gillitzer; Joachim Thüroff
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Influence of imaging and histological factors on prostate cancer detection and localisation on multiparametric MRI: a prospective study.

Authors:  Flavie Bratan; Emilie Niaf; Christelle Melodelima; Anne Laure Chesnais; Rémi Souchon; Florence Mège-Lechevallier; Marc Colombel; Olivier Rouvière
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Is incidentally detected prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy clinically significant?

Authors:  Roberta Mazzucchelli; Francesca Barbisan; Marina Scarpelli; Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Theodorus H van der Kwast; Liang Cheng; Rodolfo Montironi
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.493

8.  In vivo measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in normal and malignant prostatic tissues using echo-planar imaging.

Authors:  Bashar Issa
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  [Incidence and pathological features of incidental prostate cancer and clinical significance thereof].

Authors:  Xin-Yu Yang; Tong-Li Xia; Qun He; Wen Li; Jing-Hua Wang; Jin-Wei Su; Jun Li; Yan-Qun Na
Journal:  Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2007-10-09

10.  Role of prostate biopsy schemes in accurate prediction of Gleason scores.

Authors:  Badar M Mian; David J Lehr; Courtenay K Moore; Hugh A G Fisher; Ronald P Kaufman; Jeffery S Ross; Timothy A Jennings; Tipu Nazeer
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.