Literature DB >> 29615535

The memory remains.

Matthias Altmeyer1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage; cell cycle; p21; p53; replication stress

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29615535      PMCID: PMC5940127          DOI: 10.18632/aging.101408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)        ISSN: 1945-4589            Impact factor:   5.682


× No keyword cloud information.
Too much stress is unhealthy, it causes us to age faster and contributes to the development of diseases. However, certain tasks in life need to be completed within a given time-frame, and this necessitates good organizational skills and an efficient mode of operation. Not always can stress be avoided in such situations, and arguably more important than stress avoidance is proper time management and a good balance between labor-intense periods and more relaxed phases, which allow time for recovery. What could well be a guideline for a healthy work-life balance in the 21st century also accurately describes the challenges faced by actively dividing cells, the smallest units of life and the workhorses of our body. During cell cycle progression, these have to coordinate multiple important tasks in a limited amount of time and with limited resources. While such multi-tasking is vital for proper cell functioning and required to ensure timely completion of the cell division cycle, it also comes with an increased stress risk. DNA replication stress, for instance, is related to the intricacy associated with the duplication of a vast amount of genetic information in a relatively short time window, with complicating processes such as transcription happening simultaneously. No wonder that S-phase progression is often stressful for cells and allows little opportunities to breathe and relax. How then do cells maintain a healthy balance? One way could really be to alternate stressful phases with more relaxed ones, pushing through difficult periods to meet time-sensitive deadlines, and have them be followed by periods of recovery and repair. Intriguingly, accumulating evidence from multiple research groups suggests that this could indeed be the modus operandi of rapidly dividing cells. As a consequence, different cell cycle phases actually feed into each other rather than representing strictly separated entities [1,2]. For example, stress experienced during S-phase frequently manifests as DNA lesions in the next G1 phase of the cell cycle, suggesting that cells compromise on genome maintenance during S-phase progression, refrain from being perfectionists, and instead use subsequent cell cycle phases to restore genome integrity. What may seem like a dangerous game could in fact reduce the stress to tolerable levels and thereby enhance cellular fitness. In parallel work it was found that cells exiting from mitosis can either enter a state, which primes them for rapid cell cycle re-entry and S-phase commitment, or an alternative state of prolonged G1 duration [3]. Four research articles published in 2017 now provide a rationale for this variability in S-phase commitment and link it back to the extent of stress experienced in the previous cell cycle [4-7]. All four studies come to the conclusion that cells do not erase their history when new cells are being born during mitosis, but that instead newly born cells inherit stress signals from the previous cell generation, which in turn determines their resting time in G1 before they start a new round of replication. In other words, cells seem to possess a signaling memory, which presumably allows them to cope better with cellular stress. The four studies also converge on a role of the cell cycle regulators p53 and p21 in controlling G1 duration, in line with their function as natural barrier against cancer development. Consequently, cells lacking p53 fail to prolong their G1 phase and, when having inherited DNA lesions from the previous cell cycle, enter S-phase with an elevated damage load [6]. While it is still poorly understood how DNA lesions inherited from the parental cell generation are eventually resolved, these results emphasize that resting time, even for the ‘young’ generation, is important for stress resilience, and that continuously high levels of stress without the opportunity to pause and recover may undermine genome stability. Oncogene activation, in conjunction with loss of p53 function, may lead to such an unhealthy condition, in which over multiple cell generations stress inheritance eventually causes stable genetic alterations in the offspring and thereby drives cancer development.
  7 in total

Review 1.  More than just a focus: The chromatin response to DNA damage and its role in genome integrity maintenance.

Authors:  Jiri Lukas; Claudia Lukas; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 28.824

2.  Endogenous Replication Stress in Mother Cells Leads to Quiescence of Daughter Cells.

Authors:  Mansi Arora; Justin Moser; Harsha Phadke; Ashik Akbar Basha; Sabrina L Spencer
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 9.423

3.  The proliferation-quiescence decision is controlled by a bifurcation in CDK2 activity at mitotic exit.

Authors:  Sabrina L Spencer; Steven D Cappell; Feng-Chiao Tsai; K Wesley Overton; Clifford L Wang; Tobias Meyer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Competing memories of mitogen and p53 signalling control cell-cycle entry.

Authors:  Hee Won Yang; Mingyu Chung; Takamasa Kudo; Tobias Meyer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  How unfinished business from S-phase affects mitosis and beyond.

Authors:  Hocine W Mankouri; Diana Huttner; Ian D Hickson
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  DNA damage during S-phase mediates the proliferation-quiescence decision in the subsequent G1 via p21 expression.

Authors:  Alexis R Barr; Samuel Cooper; Frank S Heldt; Francesca Butera; Henriette Stoy; Jörg Mansfeld; Béla Novák; Chris Bakal
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Inherited DNA lesions determine G1 duration in the next cell cycle.

Authors:  Aleksandra Lezaja; Matthias Altmeyer
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 4.534

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.