Edward M A Corry1, Meenakshi Ramphul2, Ann M Rowan3, Ricardo Segurado4, Rhona M Mahony5, Declan P Keane6. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: corrye@tcd.ie. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: ramphulm@tcd.ie. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: ann.rowan@ucdconnect.ie. 4. School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sport Sciences, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. 5. National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: rmahony@nmh.ie. 6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Dublin, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: DKeane@nmh.ie.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The rate of caesarean sections at full cervical dilatation with their high risk of morbidity continues to rise mirroring the overall increase in caesarean section rates internationally. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to determine the rate of full dilatation caesarean section in a tertiary referral unit and evaluate key labour, maternal and fetal factors potentially linked to those deliveries. We also assessed maternal and fetal morbidity at full dilatation sections. Where possible, these were compared with successful operative vaginal deliveries carried out in theatre to determine key differences. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. We reviewed the rate of full dilatation caesarean section over a 10-year period. We analysed deliveries (caesarean sections or operative vaginal deliveries) in single cephalic pregnancies ≥34 weeks with contemporaneously collected data from our unit's electronic database for 2015. RESULTS: The rate of full dilatation caesarean section increased by over a third in the ten-year period (56/6947 (0.80%) vs 92/7378 (1.24%), p = 0.01). Of 84 full dilatation caesarean sections who met the inclusion criteria, 63 (75%) were nulliparous and the mean maternal age was 33 (±5) years. Oxytocin was used in the second stage in less than half of second stage caesarean sections (22 out of a recorded 57, 38.6%). There were more fetal head malposition (occipito-posterior, or occipito-transverse) at full dilatation caesarean section compared to successful operative vaginal deliveries (41/46 (89.1%) vs 2/21 (9.5), p < 0.001). The rate of significant postpartum haemorrhage (defined as estimated blood loss ≥1000 ml) was similar in both full dilatation caesarean section and operative vaginal deliveries. There was no difference in the mean birthweight at full dilatation caesarean sections compared to operative vaginal delivery (3.88 kg (2.80-5.33 kg) vs 3.48 kg (1.53-4.40 kg)). There was no difference in neonatal morbidity. CONCLUSION: Fetal head malposition is associated with a higher risk of full dilatation caesarean section. Interestingly, maternal and fetal morbidity were similar between full dilatation caesarean sections and anticipated difficult operative vaginal deliveries carried out in theatre. The management of labour in terms of the decision to use oxytocin judiciously in hope of correcting inefficient uterine contractions and continuous labour ward training, particularly the diagnosis of malposition and its correction may be beneficial in reducing the rate of full dilation caesarean sections.
BACKGROUND: The rate of caesarean sections at full cervical dilatation with their high risk of morbidity continues to rise mirroring the overall increase in caesarean section rates internationally. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to determine the rate of full dilatation caesarean section in a tertiary referral unit and evaluate key labour, maternal and fetal factors potentially linked to those deliveries. We also assessed maternal and fetal morbidity at full dilatation sections. Where possible, these were compared with successful operative vaginal deliveries carried out in theatre to determine key differences. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. We reviewed the rate of full dilatation caesarean section over a 10-year period. We analysed deliveries (caesarean sections or operative vaginal deliveries) in single cephalic pregnancies ≥34 weeks with contemporaneously collected data from our unit's electronic database for 2015. RESULTS: The rate of full dilatation caesarean section increased by over a third in the ten-year period (56/6947 (0.80%) vs 92/7378 (1.24%), p = 0.01). Of 84 full dilatation caesarean sections who met the inclusion criteria, 63 (75%) were nulliparous and the mean maternal age was 33 (±5) years. Oxytocin was used in the second stage in less than half of second stage caesarean sections (22 out of a recorded 57, 38.6%). There were more fetal head malposition (occipito-posterior, or occipito-transverse) at full dilatation caesarean section compared to successful operative vaginal deliveries (41/46 (89.1%) vs 2/21 (9.5), p < 0.001). The rate of significant postpartum haemorrhage (defined as estimated blood loss ≥1000 ml) was similar in both full dilatation caesarean section and operative vaginal deliveries. There was no difference in the mean birthweight at full dilatation caesarean sections compared to operative vaginal delivery (3.88 kg (2.80-5.33 kg) vs 3.48 kg (1.53-4.40 kg)). There was no difference in neonatal morbidity. CONCLUSION: Fetal head malposition is associated with a higher risk of full dilatation caesarean section. Interestingly, maternal and fetal morbidity were similar between full dilatation caesarean sections and anticipated difficult operative vaginal deliveries carried out in theatre. The management of labour in terms of the decision to use oxytocin judiciously in hope of correcting inefficient uterine contractions and continuous labour ward training, particularly the diagnosis of malposition and its correction may be beneficial in reducing the rate of full dilation caesarean sections.
Authors: A Banerjee; Z Al-Dabbach; F E Bredaki; D Casagrandi; A Tetteh; N Greenwold; M Ivan; D Jurkovic; A L David; R Napolitano Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2022-09 Impact factor: 8.678