Literature DB >> 29611341

Outcome and predictors of renal survival in patients with lupus nephritis: Comparison between cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil.

Young Bin Joo1, Young Mo Kang2, Hyoun-Ah Kim3, Chang-Hee Suh3, Tae-Jong Kim4, Yong-Wook Park4, Jisoo Lee5, Joo-Hyun Lee6, Dae Hyun Yoo7, Sang-Cheol Bae7, Hye-Soon Lee8, So-Young Bang8.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare renal outcomes between cyclophosphamide (CYC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and attempt to identify a predictor of renal survival.
METHODS: A total of 99 patients with class III-V lupus nephritis (LN) and treated with CYC or MMF were enrolled. The remission rate and predictors of poor renal outcomes in LN were assessed.
RESULTS: The mean age at LN diagnosis was 31.7 years. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar except for the chronicity index (3.1 ± 2.4 and 2.3 ± 0.8 for CYC and MMF, respectively, P = 0.007). The overall remission rate was 76.8% and 77.7% after 6 and 12 months, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups at these time points. After a median follow-up of 36 months (interquartile range 12-60), eight (8.1%) patients had chronic kidney disease, four (4.1%) were dialyzed permanently, and seven (7.1%) suffered a relapse, with no significant difference in these final outcomes between the two groups. Adverse events included infection (CYC group), and rash and neutropenia (MMF group), with no significant difference in frequency between the two groups. Failure of induction therapy (hazards ratio [HR] = 10.626, P = 0.022) and the creatinine level at diagnosis of LN (HR = 8.397, P = 0.007) were significantly associated with renal survival adjusted for age at LN diagnosis, disease duration and proteinuria.
CONCLUSION: Response to current induction therapy for LN was favorable, and 6 months response following induction therapy was the most important predictor for renal survival.
© 2018 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cyclophosphamide; lupus nephritis; mycophenolate mofetil; outcome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29611341     DOI: 10.1111/1756-185X.13274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Rheum Dis        ISSN: 1756-1841            Impact factor:   2.454


  5 in total

Review 1.  Lupus Nephritis: Improving Treatment Options.

Authors:  Myrto Kostopoulou; Sofia Pitsigavdaki; George Bertsias
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Renal response and its predictive factors of lupus nephritis: a 2-year real-world study of 56 hospital-based patients.

Authors:  Keqian Du; Xuecheng Zhang; Junmei Feng; Sijie Zhong; Jun Qi; Zhiming Lin
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.650

3.  Comparative Effectiveness of Rituximab and Common Induction Therapies for Lupus Nephritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kang Li; Yanqiu Yu; Yuan Gao; Fei Zhao; Zheng Liang; Junjie Gao
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 7.561

4.  Effectiveness and safety of common therapeutic drugs for refractory lupus nephritis: A network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun Zhou; Meng-Jun Tao; Lai-Run Jin; Jun Sheng; Zhi Li; Hui Peng; Liang Xu; Hui Yuan
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 5.  Management of lupus nephritis: a systematic literature review informing the 2019 update of the joint EULAR and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations.

Authors:  Myrto Kostopoulou; Antonis Fanouriakis; Kim Cheema; John Boletis; George Bertsias; David Jayne; Dimitrios T Boumpas
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2020-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.