Literature DB >> 29611278

How ecology shapes exploitation: a framework to predict the behavioural response of human and animal foragers along exploration-exploitation trade-offs.

Christopher T Monk1, Matthieu Barbier2, Pawel Romanczuk1,3,4, James R Watson5,6, Josep Alós7, Shinnosuke Nakayama8, Daniel I Rubenstein4, Simon A Levin4, Robert Arlinghaus1,9.   

Abstract

Understanding how humans and other animals behave in response to changes in their environments is vital for predicting population dynamics and the trajectory of coupled social-ecological systems. Here, we present a novel framework for identifying emergent social behaviours in foragers (including humans engaged in fishing or hunting) in predator-prey contexts based on the exploration difficulty and exploitation potential of a renewable natural resource. A qualitative framework is introduced that predicts when foragers should behave territorially, search collectively, act independently or switch among these states. To validate it, we derived quantitative predictions from two models of different structure: a generic mathematical model, and a lattice-based evolutionary model emphasising exploitation and exclusion costs. These models independently identified that the exploration difficulty and exploitation potential of the natural resource controls the social behaviour of resource exploiters. Our theoretical predictions were finally compared to a diverse set of empirical cases focusing on fisheries and aquatic organisms across a range of taxa, substantiating the framework's predictions. Understanding social behaviour for given social-ecological characteristics has important implications, particularly for the design of governance structures and regulations to move exploited systems, such as fisheries, towards sustainability. Our framework provides concrete steps in this direction.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conflict; consumer-resource; cooperation; fish and fisheries; governance; human behaviour; predator-prey; social-ecological system; sustainability

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29611278     DOI: 10.1111/ele.12949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  2 in total

1.  Causal evidence for the adaptive benefits of social foraging in the wild.

Authors:  Lysanne Snijders; Stefan Krause; Alan N Tump; Michael Breuker; Chente Ortiz; Sofia Rizzi; Indar W Ramnarine; Jens Krause; Ralf H J M Kurvers
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-01-20

2.  Collective predator evasion: Putting the criticality hypothesis to the test.

Authors:  Pascal P Klamser; Pawel Romanczuk
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 4.475

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.