Literature DB >> 29611079

Waitlist Outcomes in Liver Transplant Candidates with High MELD and Severe Hepatic Encephalopathy.

Chiranjeevi Gadiparthi1, George Cholankeril2, Eric R Yoo3, Menghan Hu4, Robert J Wong5, Aijaz Ahmed6,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and United Network for Organ Sharing (OPTN/UNOS) implemented the Share 35 policy in June 2013 to prioritize the sickest patients awaiting liver transplantation (LT). However, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score does not incorporate hepatic encephalopathy (HE), an independent predictor of waitlist mortality. AIM: To evaluate the impact of severe HE (grade 3-4) on waitlist outcomes in MELD ≥ 30 patients.
METHODS: Using the OPTN/UNOS database, we evaluated LT waitlist registrants from 2005-2014. Demographics, comorbidities, and waitlist survival were compared between four cohorts: MELD 30-34 with severe HE, MELD 30-34 without severe HE, MELD ≥ 35 with severe HE, and MELD ≥ 35 without severe HE.
RESULTS: Among 10,003 waitlist registrants studied, 41.6% had MELD score 30-34 and 58.4% had MELD ≥ 35. Patients with severe HE had a higher 90-day waitlist mortality in both MELD 30-34 (severe HE 71.1% vs. no HE 56.6%; p < 0.001) and MELD ≥ 35 subgroups (severe HE 85% versus no HE 74.2%; p < 0.001). MELD 30-34 patients with severe HE had similar 90-day waitlist mortality as MELD ≥ 35 patients without severe HE (71.1 vs. 74.2%, respectively; p = 0.35). On multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling, MELD ≥ 30 patients had 58% greater risk of 90-day waitlist mortality than those without severe HE (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.53-1.62; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Patients awaiting LT with MELD score of 30-34 and severe HE should receive priority status for organ allocation with exception MELD ≥ 35.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Liver transplantation; MELD; Severe hepatic encephalopathy; Share 35 policy; Waitlist mortality

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29611079     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-018-5032-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  20 in total

1.  Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) exception for hepatic encephalopathy.

Authors:  John Ham; Robert G Gish; Kevin Mullen
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.799

2.  Characteristics, risk factors, and mortality of cirrhotic patients hospitalized for hepatic encephalopathy with and without acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF).

Authors:  Juan Cordoba; Meritxell Ventura-Cots; Macarena Simón-Talero; Àlex Amorós; Marco Pavesi; Hendrik Vilstrup; Paolo Angeli; Marco Domenicali; Pere Ginés; Mauro Bernardi; Vicente Arroyo
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 25.083

3.  The impact of pretransplant hepatic encephalopathy on survival following liver transplantation.

Authors:  Robert J Wong; Maria Aguilar; Robert G Gish; Ramsey Cheung; Aijaz Ahmed
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.799

4.  Prognostic significance of clinical and laboratory parameters in liver cirrhosis. A multivariate statistical approach.

Authors:  A Milani; L Marra; M Siciliano; L Rossi
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1985-12

5.  The 3-month readmission rate remains unacceptably high in a large North American cohort of patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  Jasmohan S Bajaj; K Rajender Reddy; Puneeta Tandon; Florence Wong; Patrick S Kamath; Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao; Benedict Maliakkal; Scott W Biggins; Paul J Thuluvath; Michael B Fallon; Ram M Subramanian; Hugo Vargas; Leroy R Thacker; Jacqueline G O'Leary
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 17.425

6.  Early changes in liver distribution following implementation of Share 35.

Authors:  A B Massie; E K H Chow; C E Wickliffe; X Luo; S E Gentry; D C Mulligan; D L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Following the organ supply: assessing the benefit of inter-DSA travel in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Nino Dzebisashvili; Allan B Massie; Krista L Lentine; Mark A Schnitzler; Dorry Segev; Janet Tuttle-Newhall; Sommer Gentry; Richard Freeman; David A Axelrod
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2013-01-27       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Relationship of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scale to hepatic encephalopathy, as defined by electroencephalography and neuropsychometric testing, and ascites.

Authors:  Hwan Y Yoo; David Edwin; Paul J Thuluvath
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Model for end stage liver disease score predicts mortality across a broad spectrum of liver disease.

Authors:  Adnan Said; John Williams; Jeremy Holden; Patrick Remington; Ronald Gangnon; Alexandru Musat; Michael R Lucey
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 25.083

10.  Limitations of the MELD score in predicting mortality or need for removal from waiting list in patients awaiting liver transplantation.

Authors:  Daniel Gotthardt; Karl Heinz Weiss; Melanie Baumgärtner; Alexandra Zahn; Wolfgang Stremmel; Jan Schmidt; Thomas Bruckner; Peter Sauer
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  1 in total

1.  Lactulose drives a reversible reduction and qualitative modulation of the faecal microbiota diversity in healthy dogs.

Authors:  Marisa da Fonseca Ferreira; Silke Salavati Schmitz; Jeffrey Joseph Schoenebeck; Dylan Neil Clements; Susan Mary Campbell; Donna Elaine Gaylor; Richard J Mellanby; Adam George Gow; Mazdak Salavati
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.