Shiyan Wang1,2, Xiuli Sun3,4, Wenjin Cheng1,2, Jue Zhang5, Jianliu Wang6,7. 1. Department of OB/Gyn, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China. 2. Beijing Key Laboratory of Female Pelvic Floor Disorders, Beijing, China. 3. Department of OB/Gyn, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China. sunxiuli918@126.com. 4. Beijing Key Laboratory of Female Pelvic Floor Disorders, Beijing, China. sunxiuli918@126.com. 5. College of Engineering, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China. 6. Department of OB/Gyn, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China. wangjianliu1203@163.com. 7. Beijing Key Laboratory of Female Pelvic Floor Disorders, Beijing, China. wangjianliu1203@163.com.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To clarify whether the pulse electrical field (PEF) caused by transcutaneous low-frequency nerve electrical stimulation (TENS) enhances the proliferation of cervical cancer cells, leading to recurrence and metastasis, and the effect of such a PEF on a cervical cancer mouse model. METHODS: 1. In vitro experiment: SiHa cervical cancer cells treated with one session of microsecond PEFs for 30 min were divided into four groups: three experimental groups and the control group. Cell proliferation and migration were determined by CCK-8 proliferation and Transwell chamber Matrigel migration assay. 2. In vivo experiment: A mouse cancer model was established by subcutaneous implantation of SiHa cells that were then were randomly divided into the TENS group and control group. The former group received one session of TENS treatment and the control group received a sham pulse. The growth trend and tumor volume of each group were compared 28 days after PEF treatment. The proliferation and apoptosis of the tumor were determined by an immunohistochemical method. RESULTS: (1) The CCK-8 proliferation assay and cell migration ability showed no difference after PEF stimulation treatment (F = 2.478, P = 0.136 > 0.05 and F = 0.364, P = 0.779). (2) Tumor growth, size and weight showed no significant difference between the two groups. (3) Expression of VEGF, CD34, caspase-3 and Ki-67 in the tumor tissue showed no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro and in vivo experiments (mice) showed that the PEF created by TENS had no effect on the proliferation and migration of SiHa cervical cancer cells and also had no effect on the tumor growth, tumor cell apoptosis and proliferation.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To clarify whether the pulse electrical field (PEF) caused by transcutaneous low-frequency nerve electrical stimulation (TENS) enhances the proliferation of cervical cancer cells, leading to recurrence and metastasis, and the effect of such a PEF on a cervical cancermouse model. METHODS: 1. In vitro experiment: SiHa cervical cancer cells treated with one session of microsecond PEFs for 30 min were divided into four groups: three experimental groups and the control group. Cell proliferation and migration were determined by CCK-8 proliferation and Transwell chamber Matrigel migration assay. 2. In vivo experiment: A mousecancer model was established by subcutaneous implantation of SiHa cells that were then were randomly divided into the TENS group and control group. The former group received one session of TENS treatment and the control group received a sham pulse. The growth trend and tumor volume of each group were compared 28 days after PEF treatment. The proliferation and apoptosis of the tumor were determined by an immunohistochemical method. RESULTS: (1) The CCK-8 proliferation assay and cell migration ability showed no difference after PEF stimulation treatment (F = 2.478, P = 0.136 > 0.05 and F = 0.364, P = 0.779). (2) Tumor growth, size and weight showed no significant difference between the two groups. (3) Expression of VEGF, CD34, caspase-3 and Ki-67 in the tumor tissue showed no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro and in vivo experiments (mice) showed that the PEF created by TENS had no effect on the proliferation and migration of SiHa cervical cancer cells and also had no effect on the tumor growth, tumor cell apoptosis and proliferation.
Authors: Robert D Searle; Michael I Bennett; Mark I Johnson; Sarah Callin; Helen Radford Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2008-09-14 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Karen Robb; Stephen G Oxberry; Michael I Bennett; Mark I Johnson; Karen H Simpson; Robert D Searle Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2008-09-14 Impact factor: 3.612