Literature DB >> 29609954

Differentiation Between Brucellar and Tuberculous Spondylodiscitis in the Acute and Subacute Stages by MRI: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Xinxin Liu1, Hua Li2, Chao Jin3, Gang Niu4, Baoqin Guo2, Yi Chen2, Jian Yang5.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to reveal the distinctive features of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for distinguishing brucellar spondylodiscitis (BSD) from tuberculous spondylodiscitis (TSD) in the acute and subacute stages.
METHODS: This study involved 14 patients with BSD and 18 patients with TSD from May 2011 to January 2015. BSD was diagnosed based on ≥1/160 titers of a Brucella agglutination test or isolation of Brucella spp. TSD was diagnosed based on the isolation of tuberculosis bacteria. All patients underwent T1- and T2-weight imaging (T1WI and T2WI) and fat suppression T2WI (FS T2WI). The height and the signal intensity (SI) of the vertebra and intervertebral disc were assessed. The distinctive MRI features were compared using the chi-square test. The SI of the vertebra between BSD and TSD was observed in terms of histogram characteristics of kurtosis, skewness, and percentile (75%-25%) on FS T2WI.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine (76.3%) vertebrae of BSD were infected throughout the whole vertebra, and 49 (90.7%) vertebrae of TSD were infected near the osseous end plate (P <.001). Compared to TSD, the vertebral height of BSD was nearly intact (P <.001), owing to the new bone formation in the end plate without vertebral collapse. Furthermore, significant differences in the SI of the vertebra were observed between patients with BSD and TSD in terms of homogeneous characteristics on FS T2WI, that is, kurtosis (BSD vs TSD, 0.107 vs -0.250, P = .023), skewness (BSD vs TSD, -0.021 vs 0.266, P = .017), and percentile (75%-25%) (BSD vs TSD, 54.498 vs 79.399, P = .00049).
CONCLUSIONS: The nearly intact vertebra with homogeneous high signal on FS T2WI was an important MRI feature for distinguishing BSD from TSD in the acute and subacute stages.
Copyright © 2018 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Spine; brucellosis; magnetic resonance imaging; tuberculosis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29609954     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.01.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  4 in total

Review 1.  Differentiation between infectious spondylodiscitis versus inflammatory or degenerative spinal changes: How can magnetic resonance imaging help the clinician?

Authors:  Fausto Salaffi; Luca Ceccarelli; Marina Carotti; Marco Di Carlo; Gabriele Polonara; Giancarlo Facchini; Rita Golfieri; Andrea Giovagnoni
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Tuberculous and Brucellar Spondylodiscitis: Comparative Analysis of Clinical, Laboratory, and Radiological Features.

Authors:  Fatma Hammami; Makram Koubaa; Wiem Feki; Amal Chakroun; Khaoula Rekik; Fatma Smaoui; Chakib Marrakchi; Zeineb Mnif; Mounir Ben Jemaa
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2020-11-18

3.  Differentiating brucella spondylitis from tuberculous spondylitis by the conventional MRI and MR T2 mapping: a prospective study.

Authors:  Hui Guo; Siqin Lan; Yuanlin He; Maijudan Tiheiran; Wenya Liu
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 2.175

Review 4.  Bone and Joint Infections: The Role of Imaging in Tailoring Diagnosis to Improve Patients' Care.

Authors:  Andrea Sambri; Paolo Spinnato; Sara Tedeschi; Eleonora Zamparini; Michele Fiore; Riccardo Zucchini; Claudio Giannini; Emilia Caldari; Amandine Crombé; Pierluigi Viale; Massimiliano De Paolis
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-12-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.