STUDY OBJECTIVES: The complexity of the pathogenesis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children with Down syndrome (DS) is illustrated by a prevalence of residual OSA after adenotonsillectomy. The aim of this study was to investigate whether upper airway imaging combined with computation fluid dynamics could characterize treatment outcome after adenotonsillectomy in these children. METHODS: Children with DS and OSA were prospectively included. All children underwent an evaluation of the upper airway and an ultra-low dose computed tomography scan of the upper airway before adenotonsillectomy. The upper airway tract was extracted from the scan and combined with computational fluid dynamics. Results were evaluated using control polysomnography after adenotonsillectomy. RESULTS: Thirty-three children were included: 18 boys, age 4.3 ± 2.3 years, median body mass index z-score 0.6 (-2.9 to 3.0), and median obstructive apnea-hypopnea index was 15.7 (3-70) events/h. The minimal upper airway cross-sectional area was significantly smaller in children with more severe OSA (P = .03). Nineteen children underwent a second polysomnography after adenotonsillectomy. Seventy-nine percent had persistent OSA (obstructive apneahypopnea index > 2 events/h). A greater than 50% decrease in obstructive apnea-hypopnea index was observed in 79% and these children had a significantly higher volume of the regions below the tonsils. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to characterize treatment outcome in children with DS and OSA using computed tomography upper airway imaging. At baseline, children with more severe OSA had a smaller upper airway. Children with a less favorable response to adenotonsillectomy had a smaller volume of regions below the tonsils, which could be due to enlargement of the lingual tonsils, glossoptosis, or macroglossia. COMMENTARY: A commentary on this article appears in this issue on page 501.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: The complexity of the pathogenesis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children with Down syndrome (DS) is illustrated by a prevalence of residual OSA after adenotonsillectomy. The aim of this study was to investigate whether upper airway imaging combined with computation fluid dynamics could characterize treatment outcome after adenotonsillectomy in these children. METHODS:Children with DS and OSA were prospectively included. All children underwent an evaluation of the upper airway and an ultra-low dose computed tomography scan of the upper airway before adenotonsillectomy. The upper airway tract was extracted from the scan and combined with computational fluid dynamics. Results were evaluated using control polysomnography after adenotonsillectomy. RESULTS: Thirty-three children were included: 18 boys, age 4.3 ± 2.3 years, median body mass index z-score 0.6 (-2.9 to 3.0), and median obstructive apnea-hypopnea index was 15.7 (3-70) events/h. The minimal upper airway cross-sectional area was significantly smaller in children with more severe OSA (P = .03). Nineteen children underwent a second polysomnography after adenotonsillectomy. Seventy-nine percent had persistent OSA (obstructive apneahypopnea index > 2 events/h). A greater than 50% decrease in obstructive apnea-hypopnea index was observed in 79% and these children had a significantly higher volume of the regions below the tonsils. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to characterize treatment outcome in children with DS and OSA using computed tomography upper airway imaging. At baseline, children with more severe OSA had a smaller upper airway. Children with a less favorable response to adenotonsillectomy had a smaller volume of regions below the tonsils, which could be due to enlargement of the lingual tonsils, glossoptosis, or macroglossia. COMMENTARY: A commentary on this article appears in this issue on page 501.
Authors: E C Uong; J M McDonough; C E Tayag-Kier; H Zhao; J Haselgrove; S Mahboubi; R J Schwab; A I Pack; R Arens Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Haiyan Luo; Sanghun Sin; Joseph M McDonough; Carmen R Isasi; Raanan Arens; David M Wootton Journal: J Biomech Date: 2014-03-24 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Monique A Slaats; Kim Van Hoorenbeeck; Annelies Van Eyck; Wim G Vos; Jan W De Backer; An Boudewyns; Wilfried De Backer; Stijn L Verhulst Journal: Sleep Med Rev Date: 2014-08-21 Impact factor: 11.609
Authors: Giampiero Gulotta; Giannicola Iannella; Claudio Vicini; Antonella Polimeni; Antonio Greco; Marco de Vincentiis; Irene Claudia Visconti; Giuseppe Meccariello; Giovanni Cammaroto; Andrea De Vito; Riccardo Gobbi; Chiara Bellini; Elisabetta Firinu; Annalisa Pace; Andrea Colizza; Stefano Pelucchi; Giuseppe Magliulo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-09-04 Impact factor: 3.390