| Literature DB >> 29609590 |
Chengsheng Wu1,2, Nidhi Gupta1, Yung-Hsing Huang1, Hai-Feng Zhang1,3, Abdulraheem Alshareef1,4, Alexandra Chow1, Raymond Lai5,6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The phenomenon that malignant cells can acquire stemness under specific stimuli, encompassed under the concept of cancer cell plasticity, has been well-described in epithelial malignancies. To our knowledge, cancer cell plasticity has not yet been described in hematopoietic cancers. To illustrate and study cancer cell plasticity in hematopoietic cancers, we employed an in-vitro experimental model of ALK-positive anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALK+ALCL) that is based on the phenotypic and functional dichotomy of these cells, with cells responsive to a Sox2 reporter (i.e. RR cells) being significantly more stem-like than those unresponsive to the reporter (i.e. RU cells).Entities:
Keywords: Anaplastic large-cell lymphoma; Cancer cell plasticity; Intra-tumoral heterogeneity; Oxidative stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29609590 PMCID: PMC5879562 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4300-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
The primer sets for qRT-PCR performed in this study
| Gene | Forward Primers | Reverse Primers |
|---|---|---|
| BCL9 | 5’-GGCCATACCCCTAAAGCACTC-3’ | 5’-CGGAAATACTTCGCTCCTTTT-3’ |
| CTNNB1 | 5′- AAAGCGGCTGTTAGTCACTGG-3’ | 5′- CGAGTCATTGCATACTGTCCAT-3’ |
| SOX2 | 5′- GCCGAGTGGAAACTTTTGTCG-3’ | 5′- GGCAGCGTGTACTTATCCTTCT-3’ |
| WNT2B | 5′- GATCAAGATGGTGCCAACTTC-3’ | 5′- CCAAGACACAGTAATCTGGAGAG-3’ |
| GAPDH | 5′- GGAGCGAGATCCCTCCAAAAT-3’ | 5′- GGCTGTTGTCATACTTCTCATGG-3’ |
Fig. 1Oxidative stress induces the conversion of RU to RR cells. a RU cells derived from SupM2 and Karpas 299 cells were subjected to various doses of H2O2 for up to 2 days. The percent of GFP-positive cells was assessed by flow cytometry in RU cells from day 0 (the day of the treatment), day 1, and day 2. b The schematic experimental model of 0.3 mM H2O2 re-challenge treatment in RU cells derived from SupM2. c The GFP-positive cells in RU cells derived from SupM2 and Karpas 299 cells upon 0.3 mM and 0.5 mM H2O2 re-challenge treatment, respectively, at day 5. d The SRR2 luciferase activity in both RU and RR cells derived from SupM2 and Karpas 299 cells upon H2O2 re-challenge treatment at day 5. e The GFP-intensity of RU cells derived from SupM2, RU cells with H2O2 re-challenge, RR cells and RR cells with H2O2 re-challenge at day 5
Fig. 2Converted RR cells share similar biological functions with native RR cells. a RU and RR cells from SupM2 cells were re-challenged with 0.3 mM H2O2 for 5 days. Then the cells were subjected to 0, 100, 200 ng/mL doxorubicin for 48 h. Cells without H2O2 treatment were included as control. b RU and RR cells derived from SupM2 cells were re-challenged with 0.3 mM H2O2 for 5 days. Then the cells were processed for methylcellulose colony formation assay in the presence/absence of 50 ng/mL doxorubicin, cells without H2O2 treatment were included as control. The graph demonstrated the number of colonies in the above experimental groups. The lower panel showed one representative result of triplicate experiments. Only colony with 40 cells (as pointed by the black arrow) or more was counted. c The serial diluted RU and RR cells derived from SupM2 were seeded in 96-well plate. After ~ 8 days, the number of spheres was counted in the highlighted wells circulated by the rectangle lines. The right panel showed the analyzed results which indicated that converted RR cells and native RR cells have formed more spheres in a lower number of cells seeded, in comparison with native RU cells
Fig. 3Converted RR cells share similar biochemical features with RR cells. a The Western blotting results showed the protein levels of active β-catenin, total β-catenin, p-MYCS62, and MYC in RU and RR cells derived from SupM2 and Karpas 299 cells, with or without H2O2 re-challenge. b The qRT-PCR results suggested that the Sox2 downstream targets including WNT2B and BCL9 significantly increased in mRNA level in converted RR cells (upper panel) and RR cells re-challenged with H2O2 (lower panel), in comparison with their counterpart cells. c SRR2 probe pull-down assay was performed to evaluate the Sox2-SRR2 DNA binding ability. The results suggested that more Sox2 was pulled down by biotin-labeled SRR2 probe in converted RR cells and RR cells after H2O2 stimulation as compared to their native RU and RR cells. The input of the pull-down assay demonstrated that the Sox2 expression was not appreciably altered in this experiment. Imag J software was utilized to analyze the densitometry. Densitometry values of proteins of interest were all normalized to β-actin bands, and the densitometry value of protein of interest in RU cells was normalized as 1.0
Fig. 4Blockage of Wnt/β-catenin/MYC/Sox2 axis abrogates the RU to RR conversion. a Pharmacological inhibition of MYC or β-catenin using 5 μM 10074-G5 or 50 μM quercetin for 24 h significantly decreased the SRR2 luciferase activities that were upregulated by H2O2 re-challenge. The Western blots below showed the knockdown efficiency of MYC and β-catenin after inhibitor treatment for 24 h. b RU cells with Sox2 knockdown by siRNA showed significantly decreased SRR2 luciferase activity in comparison to cells transfected with scrambled siRNA in the H2O2 re-challenge experiment. The Western blots below suggested the Sox2 knockdown efficiency at 48 h post siRNA transfection. Imag J software was used to analyze the densitometry. All proteins’ densitometry values were normalized to γ-tubulin bands, and the densitometry value of protein of interest in RU cells was normalized as 1.0