| Literature DB >> 29609543 |
Xiaoxiao Gao1, Jing Ye1,2,3, Chen Yang1, Lei Luo1, Ya Liu1,2,3, Jianping Ding1,2,3, Yunhai Zhang1,2,3, Yinghui Ling1,2,3, Weiping Huang1,2,3, Xiaorong Zhang1,2,3, Kaifa Zhang1, Xiumei Li1,2,3, Jie Zhou1,3, Fugui Fang4,5,6, Zubing Cao7,8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Puberty is a pivotal stage in female animal development, and marks the onset of reproductive capability. However, little is known about the function of lncRNAs (long noncoding RNAs) in puberty. Therefore, RNA-seq analysis were performed between goats and rats to clarify the roles of lncRNAs and mRNAs in the onset of puberty.Entities:
Keywords: Hypothalamus; Puberty; XLOC_446331; lncRNA
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29609543 PMCID: PMC5879571 DOI: 10.1186/s12863-018-0608-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genet ISSN: 1471-2156 Impact factor: 2.797
Real-time PCR primers and sizes of the amplification products of the target and housekeeping genes
| Gene | Forward primer, 5′-3′ | Reverse primer, 5′-3′ | Product size, (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| GAGATGATAGCGAGATAAGAGG | GTTAGGTGACATAGTGGTTCC | 113 |
|
| GCCTACCTAAGATTGAAGCAGTC | CAGTGAGGGAGCGAGAACC | 122 |
|
| GCCAGCAAGAGGAAGAAGAG | CACAGAGCAGAGTTCACAGG | 105 |
|
| TGATTGTGGACCTCTAAGC | TGCGGACTCATTCTTCTG | 147 |
|
| CTCTGTTGTCTGGTCCTTC | TGCCATTGATGTCCTTACG | 200 |
|
| GGACTGACTGGCTTCTGAG | TGGCTGTGCTGGATTGAC | 140 |
|
| TGCTGATTCTCCCTGTGGTTTATG | GCTTCCCTGGTTGTGCTTGG | 104 |
|
| CTTTCTCCTCCCGCTCTG | TCTGATCTCGCTGTCTTCG | 132 |
| CCCAACTGTGACCGCAAAG | TCCACGCACCAGCAGATG | 86 | |
| TACAAGACACTGAGATGG | CTATGGTCACAATTAGGC | 115 | |
| GTGCCCGCCTGCTGAAAG | TGCTGGATGTTGTTGGTGACG | 94 | |
| GCCGCTGTTGTTCTGTTGAC | CTGGGGTTCTGCCATTTGA | 117 | |
| CAGTCGTGTGGCGTCTAC | AGCGGCTTCTCCTCATCC | 77 | |
| CCGCAGACACTTGGATTCAG | TCACAGTTTGGCACATAGAGC | 87 | |
| CAGTCGTGTGGCGTCTAC | AGCGGCTTCTCCTCATCC | 163 | |
| TGCTGCTTCTCCTCTGTG | CCAGGCATTAACGAGTTCC | 116 | |
| CGTGACATCAAGGAGAAG | GAAGGAAGGCTGGAAGAG | 171 | |
| CCCATCTATGAGGGTTACGC | TTTAATTGTCACGCACGATTTC | 150 |
Fig. 1Comparison of transcript expression levels between goats and rats. Expression level of mRNAs and lncRNAs were indicated by log10(FPKM + 1). a. FPKM distribution of transcripts in goat, b. FPKM distribution of transcripts in rat
Fig. 2Comparison of features of lncRNAs in goats and rats. a Length distribution of lncRNAs between the two species. b Distribution of open reading frame length between the two species. c Distribution of exon number of lncRNAs between the two species
Fig. 3Results of qRT-PCR of the candidate genes involved in puberty. The lncRNAs and target genes were examined using quantitative qRT-PCR. Data are expressed as the means ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. a. Goat, b. Rat
Fig. 4Analysis of KEGG pathways for mRNA between goats and rats. Y-axis, the terms of pathways; X-axis, rich factor; the size of point indicated the number of differential expressed genes. The colour of point indicated the range of P. a KEGG pathways between prepubertal and pubertal goats. b KEGG pathways between prepubertal and pubertal rats
Fig. 5Analysis of GO pathways involved in puberty between goat and rat. BP, biological process; CC, cellular component; MF, molecular function. Left Y-axis, the ratio of single annotation in total annotation. Right Y-axis, The number of genes included in single annotation. X-axis, the terms of GO pathways
Fig. 6The expression of genes in hypothalamus cells after siRNA transfection. The expressions of genes were examined using quantitative qRT-PCR. Data are expressed as the means ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01