Literature DB >> 29609207

Open-Label, Non-Mandatory Transitioning From Originator Etanercept to Biosimilar SB4: Six-Month Results From a Controlled Cohort Study.

Lieke Tweehuysen1, Victor J B Huiskes1, Bart J F van den Bemt2, Johanna E Vriezekolk1, Steven Teerenstra3, Frank H J van den Hoogen4, Cornelia H van den Ende4, Alfons A den Broeder4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of non-mandatory transitioning from the originator biologic drug etanercept (ETN) to its biosimilar, SB4, on drug survival and effectiveness in a controlled cohort study of patients with an inflammatory rheumatic disease.
METHODS: In 2016, 642 patients were asked to transition their treatment from originator ETN to biosimilar SB4 by a structured communication strategy with opt-out option. Patients who consented to switch to SB4 were considered eligible for inclusion in the transition cohort, while patients being treated with originator ETN in 2014 were recruited as the historical cohort. Drug survival was compared between the 2 cohorts using Cox regression analyses, which were adjusted for age, sex, diagnosis, ETN treatment duration, ETN dose interval, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug usage, and C-reactive protein (CRP) level, with a robust variance estimator applied to account for repeated subjects (i.e., patients who were included in both the transition cohort and the historical cohort). Adjusted differences in the 6-month change in CRP level, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using CRP level (DAS28-CRP), and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index were also assessed.
RESULTS: Of the 642 ETN-treated patients, 635 (99%) agreed to transition from originator ETN to biosimilar SB4, of whom 625 patients (433 with rheumatoid arthritis, 128 with psoriatic arthritis, and 64 with ankylosing spondylitis) were included in the transition cohort, and 600 ETN-treated patients from 2014 were included in the historical cohort. The crude treatment persistence rate for biosimilar SB4 over 6 months was 90% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 88-93%), compared to a 6-month treatment persistence rate of 92% (95% CI 90-94%) for originator ETN. Patients in the transition cohort, compared to the historical cohort, had a statistically significantly higher relative risk of treatment discontinuation (adjusted hazard ratio 1.57, 95% CI 1.05-2.36) and showed smaller decreases in the CRP level (adjusted difference 1.8, 95% CI 0.3-3.2) and DAS28-CRP (adjusted difference 0.15, 95% CI 0.05-0.25) over 6 months.
CONCLUSION: Non-mandatory transitioning from originator ETN to biosimilar SB4 using a specifically designed communication strategy resulted in a slightly lower 6-month treatment persistence rate and smaller decreases in disease activity in the transition cohort compared to the historical cohort, but these differences were not considered clinically relevant.
© 2018, American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29609207     DOI: 10.1002/art.40516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol        ISSN: 2326-5191            Impact factor:   10.995


  27 in total

Review 1.  [Current treatment of axial spondylarthritis : Clinical efficacy].

Authors:  U Kiltz; J Braun
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.372

2.  A brief overview of biosimilars and factors limiting their uptake.

Authors:  Nicholas Sosulski
Journal:  Can Pharm J (Ott)       Date:  2019-10-14

3.  Biosimilar Uptake in Academic and Veterans Health Administration Settings: Influence of Institutional Incentives.

Authors:  Joshua F Baker; Charles E Leonard; Vincent Lo Re; Michael H Weisman; Michael D George; Jonathan Kay
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 10.995

4.  A bio-what? Medical companions' perceptions towards biosimilars and information needs in rheumatology.

Authors:  Chiara Gasteiger; Urte Scholz; Keith J Petrie; Nicola Dalbeth
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 3.580

5.  Switching patients with inflammatory arthritis from Etanercept (Enbrel®) to the biosimilar drug, SB4 (Benepali®): A single-centre retrospective observational study in the UK and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Anastasia-Vasiliki Madenidou; Andrew Jeffries; Sneha Varughese; Stephen Jones; Hanadi Sari-Kouzel; Helen Veevers; Chandini Rao
Journal:  Mediterr J Rheumatol       Date:  2019-05-31

6.  Non-pharmacological Effects in Switching Medication: The Nocebo Effect in Switching from Originator to Biosimilar Agent.

Authors:  Lars Erik Kristensen; Rieke Alten; Luis Puig; Sandra Philipp; Tore K Kvien; Maria Antonia Mangues; Frank van den Hoogen; Karel Pavelka; Arnold G Vulto
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.807

Review 7.  Focus on biosimilar etanercept - bioequivalence and interchangeability.

Authors:  Fabrizio Cantini; Maurizio Benucci
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2018-08-30

Review 8.  Era of biosimilars in rheumatology: reshaping the healthcare environment.

Authors:  Josef S Smolen; Joao Goncalves; Mark Quinn; Fabrizio Benedetti; Jake Yongkwon Lee
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2019-05-21

Review 9.  Treatment journey in rheumatoid arthritis with biosimilars: from better access to good disease control through cost savings and prevention of nocebo effects.

Authors:  Josef S Smolen; Roberto Caporali; Thomas Doerner; Bruno Fautrel; Fabrizio Benedetti; Burkhard Pieper; Minjun Jang
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2021-06

Review 10.  Real-World Evidence on Etanercept Biosimilar SB4 in Etanercept-Naïve or Switching Patients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hans C Ebbers; Burkhard Pieper; Amine Issa; Janet Addison; Ulrich Freudensprung; Mourad F Rezk
Journal:  Rheumatol Ther       Date:  2019-08-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.