Anisleidy Carbo1, Manish Gupta1, Leonardo Tamariz1,2, Ana Palacio1,2, Silvina Levis1, Zsuzsanna Nemeth3, Stuti Dang1,4. 1. 1 Division of Internal Medicine, GRECC, Veterans Affairs Medical Center , Miami, Florida. 2. 2 Division of Population Health and Computational Medicine, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami , Miami, Florida. 3. 3 Department of Health Informatics, Calder Memorial Library, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami , Miami, Florida. 4. 4 Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) conducted among heart failure (HF) patients have reported that mobile technologies can improve HF-related outcomes. Our aim was to conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate m-Health's impact on healthcare services utilization, mortality, and cost. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane, CINAHL, and EMBASE for studies published between 1966 and May-2017. We included studies that compared the use of m-Health in HF patients to usual care. m-Health is defined as the use of mobile computing and communication technologies to record and transmit data. The outcomes were HF-related and all-cause hospital days, cost, admissions, and mortality. RESULTS: Our search strategy resulted in 1,494 articles. We included 10 RCTs and 1 quasi-experimental study, which represented 3,109 patients in North America and Europe. Patient average age range was 53-80 years, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III, and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction <50%. Patients were mostly monitored daily and followed for an average of 6 months. A reduction was seen in HF-related hospital days. Nonsignificant reductions were seen in HF-related cost, admissions, and mortality and total mortality. We found no significant differences for all-cause hospital days and admissions, and an increase in total cost. CONCLUSIONS: m-Health reduced HF-related hospital days, showed reduction trends in total mortality and HF-related admissions, mortality and cost, and increased total costs related to more clinic visits and implementation of new technologies. More studies reporting consistent quality outcomes are warranted to give conclusive information about the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of m-Health interventions for HF.
BACKGROUND: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) conducted among heart failure (HF) patients have reported that mobile technologies can improve HF-related outcomes. Our aim was to conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate m-Health's impact on healthcare services utilization, mortality, and cost. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane, CINAHL, and EMBASE for studies published between 1966 and May-2017. We included studies that compared the use of m-Health in HF patients to usual care. m-Health is defined as the use of mobile computing and communication technologies to record and transmit data. The outcomes were HF-related and all-cause hospital days, cost, admissions, and mortality. RESULTS: Our search strategy resulted in 1,494 articles. We included 10 RCTs and 1 quasi-experimental study, which represented 3,109 patients in North America and Europe. Patient average age range was 53-80 years, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III, and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction <50%. Patients were mostly monitored daily and followed for an average of 6 months. A reduction was seen in HF-related hospital days. Nonsignificant reductions were seen in HF-related cost, admissions, and mortality and total mortality. We found no significant differences for all-cause hospital days and admissions, and an increase in total cost. CONCLUSIONS: m-Health reduced HF-related hospital days, showed reduction trends in total mortality and HF-related admissions, mortality and cost, and increased total costs related to more clinic visits and implementation of new technologies. More studies reporting consistent quality outcomes are warranted to give conclusive information about the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of m-Health interventions for HF.
Authors: Romina Nemecek; Patrick Huber; Sophie Schur; Eva Katharina Masel; Lukas Baumann; Christoph Hoeller; Herbert Watzke; Michael Binder Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2019-10-30 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Niraj Varma; Iwona Cygankiewicz; Mintu P Turakhia; Hein Heidbuchel; Yu-Feng Hu; Lin Yee Chen; Jean-Philippe Couderc; Edmond M Cronin; Jerry D Estep; Lars Grieten; Deirdre A Lane; Reena Mehra; Alex Page; Rod Passman; Jonathan P Piccini; Ewa Piotrowicz; Ryszard Piotrowicz; Pyotr G Platonov; Antonio Luiz Ribeiro; Robert E Rich; Andrea M Russo; David Slotwiner; Jonathan S Steinberg; Emma Svennberg Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2021-02-12
Authors: Niraj Varma; Iwona Cygankiewicz; Mintu P Turakhia; Hein Heidbuchel; Yufeng Hu; Lin Yee Chen; Jean-Philippe Couderc; Edmond M Cronin; Jerry D Estep; Lars Grieten; Deirdre A Lane; Reena Mehra; Alex Page; Rod Passman; Jonathan P Piccini; Ewa Piotrowicz; Ryszard Piotrowicz; Pyotr G Platonov; Antonio Luiz Ribeiro; Robert E Rich; Andrea M Russo; David Slotwiner; Jonathan S Steinberg; Emma Svennberg Journal: Cardiovasc Digit Health J Date: 2021-01-29
Authors: Hang Ding; Sheau Huey Chen; Iain Edwards; Rajiv Jayasena; James Doecke; Jamie Layland; Ian A Yang; Andrew Maiorana Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-11-13 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Felix Holl; Jennifer Kircher; Walter J Swoboda; Johannes Schobel Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jennifer Dickman Portz; Kelsey Lynett Ford; Kira Elsbernd; Christopher E Knoepke; Kelsey Flint; David B Bekelman; Rebecca S Boxer; Sheana Bull Journal: JMIR Cardio Date: 2020-09-04