Literature DB >> 29607720

A practical 'safe zone' technique for lag screw fixation of the fibula.

A R Kaye1, W Marlow1, G Williams1, A P Molloy1, L W Mason1.   

Abstract

Introduction During ankle fracture fixation, iatrogenic trauma to retro fibula structures can result in morbidity and reoperation. We describe a safe zone for lag screw insertion. Materials and methods This study was completed in three sections. We identified the average entry and exit points for the lag screw using 45 Weber B ankle fractures identified from our trauma database. We then analysed 26 sequentially presented ankle magnetic resonance images, concentrating on axial sections at 4, 8, 12 and 16 mm above the ankle joint. Finally, we used 63 sequentially performed magnetic resonance scans to confirm the safe zone from these consistent structures. Results The typical lag screw exit point was 14.2 mm above the ankle joint (95% confidence Interval 11.3-17.1 mm). A safe zone trajectory occurred between 31 and 45 degrees taken from the anterior aspect of the flat fibular surface at this level. The obvious palpable landmark to direct screw trajectory and avoid 'at risk' structures was found to be the medial edge of the Achilles tendon. Our final dataset confirmed in 63 scans, the medial aspect of the Achilles tendon to be a consistent safe zone with a minimum distance of at risk structures of 4 mm. Conclusion This simple method of directing the fibula lag screw towards the palpable medial edge of the Achilles tendon is practical, easy to teach and directs the screw on a safe trajectory away from the most commonly injured structures around the back of the fibula.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankle Fractures; Bone Screw; Lag screw

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29607720      PMCID: PMC5956610          DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  9 in total

Review 1.  Review of successful litigation against english health trusts in the treatment of adults with orthopaedic pathology: clinical governance lessons learned.

Authors:  Amit Atrey; C M Gupte; S A Corbett
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Fractures of the ankle. III. Genetic roentgenologic diagnosis of fractures of the ankle.

Authors:  N LAUGE-HANSEN
Journal:  Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med       Date:  1954-03

3.  Safe corridors in external fixation: the lower leg (tibia, fibula, hindfoot and forefoot).

Authors:  Selvadurai Nayagam
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2007-12-04

4.  Nerve and tendon injury with percutaneous fibular pinning: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Justin Iorio; Katharine Criner; Saqib Rehman; Casey Meizinger; Christopher Haydel
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 5.  Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating ankle fractures in adults.

Authors:  Christian C M A Donken; Hesham Al-Khateeb; Michael H J Verhofstad; Cornelis J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-08-15

6.  Peroneal tendon lesions caused by antiglide plates used for fixation of lateral malleolar fractures: the effect of plate and screw position.

Authors:  Martin Weber; Fabian Krause
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.827

7.  The epidemic of ankle fractures in the elderly--is surgical treatment warranted?

Authors:  M Salai; I Dudkiewicz; I Novikov; Y Amit; A Chechick
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Adult ankle fractures--an increasing problem?

Authors:  C M Court-Brown; J McBirnie; G Wilson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1998-02

Review 9.  Understanding risks and complications in the management of ankle fractures.

Authors:  Saurabh Sagar Mehta; Kishan Rees; Lucy Cutler; Jitendra Mangwani
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.251

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.