Literature DB >> 29607704

Perceived Barriers to Goals of Care Discussions With Patients With Advanced Cancer and Their Families in the Ambulatory Setting: A Multicenter Survey of Oncologists.

Josee-Lyne Ethier1, Thivaher Paramsothy2, John J You3,4, Robert Fowler5,6, Sonal Gandhi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Earlier goals of care (GOC) discussions in patients with advanced cancer are associated with less aggressive end-of-life care including decreased use of medical technologies. Unfortunately, conversations often occur late in the disease trajectory when patients are acutely unwell. Here, we evaluate practitioner perspectives of patient, family, physician, and external barriers to early GOC discussions in the ambulatory oncology setting.
METHODS: A previously published survey to assess barriers to GOC discussions among clinicians on inpatient medical wards was modified for the ambulatory oncology setting and distributed to oncologists from 12 centers in Ontario, Canada. Physicians were asked to rank the importance of various barriers to having GOC discussions (1 = extremely unimportant to 7 = extremely important).
RESULTS: Questionnaires were completed by 30 (24%) of 127 physicians. Respondents perceived patient- and family-related factors as the most important barriers to GOC discussions. Of these, patient difficulty accepting prognosis or desire for aggressive treatment were perceived as most important. Patients' inflated expectation of treatment benefit was also considered an important barrier to discontinuing active cancer-directed therapy. While physician barriers were ranked lower than patient-related factors, clinicians' self-identified difficulty estimating prognosis and uncertainty regarding treatment benefits were also considered important. Patient's refusal for referral was the most highly rated barrier to early palliative care referral. Most respondents were nonetheless very or extremely willing to initiate (90%) or lead (87%) GOC discussions.
CONCLUSION: Oncologists ranked patient- and family-related factors as the most important barriers to GOC discussions, while clinicians' self-identified difficulty estimating prognosis and uncertainty regarding treatment benefits were also considered important. Further work is required to assess patient preferences and perceptions and develop targeted interventions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  advance care planning; end-of-life discussions; goals of care; oncology

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29607704     DOI: 10.1177/0825859718762287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Care        ISSN: 0825-8597            Impact factor:   2.250


  15 in total

1.  Barriers to the early integration of palliative care in pediatric oncology in 11 Eurasian countries.

Authors:  Bella S Ehrlich; Narine Movsisyan; Tsetsegsaikhan Batmunkh; Ella Kumirova; Marina V Borisevich; Kirill Kirgizov; Dylan E Graetz; Michael J McNeil; Taisiya Yakimkova; Anna Vinitsky; Gia Ferrara; Chen Li; Zhaohua Lu; Erica C Kaye; Justin N Baker; Asya Agulnik
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Predicting need for advanced illness or palliative care in a primary care population using electronic health record data.

Authors:  Kenneth Jung; Sylvia E K Sudat; Nicole Kwon; Walter F Stewart; Nigam H Shah
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Addressing the needs of parents with advanced cancer: Attitudes, practice behaviors, and training experiences of oncology social workers.

Authors:  Laura J Quillen; Nancy A Borstelmann; Kate E Stanton; Courtney A Nelson; Stephanie A Chien; Savannah M Bowers; Catherine L Swift; Yulissa Gonzalez; Samantha M Yi; Eliza M Park
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2021-06

4.  Patient-physician discordance in goals of care for patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  S L Douglas; B J Daly; N J Meropol; A R Lipson
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Clinical Trials: Understanding Patient Perspectives and Beliefs About Treatment.

Authors:  Betty Ferrell; Anna Cathy Williams; Tami Borneman; Vincent Chung; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  Clin J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 1.283

6.  Patient and clinician experience of a serious illness conversation guide in oncology: A descriptive analysis.

Authors:  Joanna Paladino; Luca Koritsanszky; Lauren Nisotel; Bridget A Neville; Kate Miller; Justin Sanders; Evan Benjamin; Erik Fromme; Susan Block; Rachelle Bernacki
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 4.452

7.  The impact of initial treatment strategy and survival time on quality of end-of-life care among patients with oesophageal and gastric cancer: A population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Karin Dalhammar; Marlene Malmström; Maria Schelin; Dan Falkenback; Jimmie Kristensson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Feasibility and acceptability of introducing advance care planning on a thoracic medicine inpatient ward: an exploratory mixed method study.

Authors:  Nina Elisabeth Hjorth; Margrethe Aase Schaufel; Katrin Ruth Sigurdardottir; Dagny R Faksvåg Haugen
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2020-02

9.  Integrating Palliative Care for Patients on Clinical Trials: Opportunities for Oncology Nurses.

Authors:  Betty Ferrell; Tami Borneman; Anna Cathy Williams; Angela Scardina; Patricia Fischer; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2020-06-26

10.  Barriers to advance care planning: a qualitative study of seriously ill Chinese patients and their families.

Authors:  Johnny T K Cheung; Doreen Au; Anthony H F Ip; Jenny Chan; Kenway Ng; Lok Cheung; Jacqueline Yuen; Elsie Hui; Jenny Lee; Raymond Lo; Jean Woo
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.