Literature DB >> 29607601

Low-dose-rate brachytherapy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer in men with a high risk of disease relapse.

Robert Laing1, Jennifer Uribe1, Santiago Uribe-Lewis1, Julian Money-Kyrle1, Carla Perna1, Stylianos Chintzoglou1, Sara Khaksar1, Stephen E M Langley1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To report clinical outcomes of 125 I low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDR-PB) as monotherapy or combined with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and/or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in high-risk localised prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Analysis of clinical outcomes from a prospective cohort of patients treated with LDR-PB alone or combined treatment in a single institution. Men with a high risk of disease relapse were identified by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) criteria or by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria. Relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS), and metastases-free survival (MFS), were analysed together with patient-reported symptom scores and physician-reported adverse events.
RESULTS: The NICE and NCCN criteria identified 267 and 202 high-risk patients, respectively. NICE-defined patients had significantly lower pre-treatment PSA levels, Gleason scores <7, and a greater proportion of patients who received LDR-PB monotherapy. At 9 years after implantation RFS was 89% and 87% in the NICE and NCCN groups, respectively (log-rank P = 0.637), and OS 93% and 94%, respectively (log-rank P = 0.481). All of the survival estimates were similar between LDR-PB monotherapy and combined therapies. Cox proportional hazards regression confirmed RFS was similar between the treatment types. Treatment-related toxicity was also similar between the treatment methods.
CONCLUSION: LDR-PB is effective at controlling localised prostate cancer in patients with a high risk of disease relapse. As the present study was not randomised, it is not possible to define those patients who need the addition of ADT and/or EBRT. However, the NICE criteria appear suitable to define treatment options where patients could benefit from LDR-PB as monotherapy or combined treatment. This choice should be discussed with the patient taking into account comorbidities and presence of multiple high-risk factors.
© 2018 The Authors BJU International © 2018 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LDR brachytherapy; high-risk; prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29607601     DOI: 10.1111/bju.14223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  2 in total

1.  Low-Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy (LDR-PB) adopts postsurgical PSA value for definition of cure.

Authors:  Jennifer Uribe; Santiago Uribe-Lewis; Sara Khaksar; Carla Perna; Christos Mikropoulos; Sophie Otter; Robert Laing; Stephen Langley
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2020-10-19

2.  A machine-learning approach based on 409 treatments to predict optimal number of iodine-125 seeds in low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Nicolas Boussion; Ulrike Schick; Gurvan Dissaux; Luc Ollivier; Gaëlle Goasduff; Olivier Pradier; Antoine Valeri; Dimitris Visvikis
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2021-10-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.