Xiaoying Cai1, Frederick H Epstein1,2. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia. 2. Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a self-navigated method for free-breathing spiral cine displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE), a myocardial strain imaging technique that uses phase-cycling for artifact suppression. The method needed to address 2 consequences of motion for DENSE: striping artifacts from incomplete suppression of the T1 -relaxation echo and blurring. METHODS: The method identifies phase-cycled spiral interleaves at matched respiratory phases by minimizing the residual signal due to T1 relaxation after phase-cycling subtraction. Next, the method reconstructs image-based navigators from matched phase-cycled interleaves that are comprised of the stimulated echo (ste-iNAVs). Ste-iNAVs are used for motion estimation and compensation of k-space data. The method was demonstrated in phantoms and compared to diaphragm-based navigator (dNAV) and conventional iNAV (c-iNAV) methods for the reconstruction of free-breathing volunteer data sets (N = 10). RESULTS: Phantom experiments demonstrated that the proposed method removes striping artifacts and blurring due to motion. Volunteer results showed that respiratory motion measured by ste-iNAVs was better correlated than c-iNAVs to dNAV data (R2 = 0.82 ± 0.03 vs. 0.70 ± 0.05, P < 0.05). Match-making reconstructions of free-breathing data sets achieved lower residual T1 -relaxation echo energy (1.04 ± 0.01 vs. 1.18 ± 0.04 for dNAV and 1.18 ± 0.03 for c-iNAV, P < 0.05), higher apparent SNR (11.93 ± 1.05 vs. 10.68 ± 1.06 for dNAV and 10.66 ± 0.99 for c-iNAV, P < 0.05), and better phase quality (0.147 ± 0.012 vs. 0.166 ± 0.017 for dNAV, P = 0.06, and 0.168 ± 0.015 for c-iNAV, P < 0.05) than dNAV and c-iNAV methods. CONCLUSION: For free-breathing cine DENSE, the proposed method addresses both types of breathing-induced artifacts and provides better quality images than conventional dNAV and iNAV methods.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a self-navigated method for free-breathing spiral cine displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE), a myocardial strain imaging technique that uses phase-cycling for artifact suppression. The method needed to address 2 consequences of motion for DENSE: striping artifacts from incomplete suppression of the T1 -relaxation echo and blurring. METHODS: The method identifies phase-cycled spiral interleaves at matched respiratory phases by minimizing the residual signal due to T1 relaxation after phase-cycling subtraction. Next, the method reconstructs image-based navigators from matched phase-cycled interleaves that are comprised of the stimulated echo (ste-iNAVs). Ste-iNAVs are used for motion estimation and compensation of k-space data. The method was demonstrated in phantoms and compared to diaphragm-based navigator (dNAV) and conventional iNAV (c-iNAV) methods for the reconstruction of free-breathing volunteer data sets (N = 10). RESULTS: Phantom experiments demonstrated that the proposed method removes striping artifacts and blurring due to motion. Volunteer results showed that respiratory motion measured by ste-iNAVs was better correlated than c-iNAVs to dNAV data (R2 = 0.82 ± 0.03 vs. 0.70 ± 0.05, P < 0.05). Match-making reconstructions of free-breathing data sets achieved lower residual T1 -relaxation echo energy (1.04 ± 0.01 vs. 1.18 ± 0.04 for dNAV and 1.18 ± 0.03 for c-iNAV, P < 0.05), higher apparent SNR (11.93 ± 1.05 vs. 10.68 ± 1.06 for dNAV and 10.66 ± 0.99 for c-iNAV, P < 0.05), and better phase quality (0.147 ± 0.012 vs. 0.166 ± 0.017 for dNAV, P = 0.06, and 0.168 ± 0.015 for c-iNAV, P < 0.05) than dNAV and c-iNAV methods. CONCLUSION: For free-breathing cine DENSE, the proposed method addresses both types of breathing-induced artifacts and provides better quality images than conventional dNAV and iNAV methods.
Authors: Xiaojuan Li; Eric T Han; C Benjamin Ma; Thomas M Link; David C Newitt; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Daniel A Auger; Kenneth C Bilchick; Jorge A Gonzalez; Sophia X Cui; Jeffrey W Holmes; Christopher M Kramer; Michael Salerno; Frederick H Epstein Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Mohamad Abdi; Xue Feng; Changyu Sun; Kenneth C Bilchick; Craig H Meyer; Frederick H Epstein Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2021-05-22 Impact factor: 3.737