Franz-Philipp Schmidt1,2, Arthur Losquin3,4, Ferdinand Hofer2, Andreas Hohenau1, Joachim R Krenn1, Mathieu Kociak5. 1. Institute of Physics, University of Graz, Graz 8010, Austria. 2. Institute for Electron Microscopy and Nanoanalysis, Graz University of Technology, Graz 8010, Austria. 3. Department of Physics, Lund University, Lund 221 00, Sweden. 4. Laboratoire Ondes et Matière d'Aquitaine, UMR 5798, CNRS-University of Bordeaux, F-33405 Talence Cedex, France. 5. Laboratoire de Physique des Solides, CNRS UMR 8502, Université Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay, France.
Abstract
Due to a vanishing dipole moment, radial breathing modes in small flat plasmonic nanoparticles do not couple to light and have to be probed with a near-field source, as in electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS). With increasing particle size, retardation gives rise to light coupling, enabling probing breathing modes optically or by cathodoluminescence (CL). Here, we investigate single silver nanodisks with diameters of 150-500 nm by EELS and CL in an electron microscope and quantify the EELS/CL ratio, which corresponds to the ratio of full to radiative damping of the breathing mode. For the investigated diameter range, we find the CL signal to increase by about 1 order of magnitude, in agreement with numerical simulations. Due to reciprocity, our findings corroborate former optical experiments and enable a quantitative understanding of the light coupling of dark plasmonic modes.
Due to a vanishing dipole moment, radial breathing modes in small flat plasmonic nanoparticles do not couple to light and have to be probed with a near-field source, as in electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS). With increasing particle size, retardation gives rise to light coupling, enabling probing breathing modes optically or by cathodoluminescence (CL). Here, we investigate single silver nanodisks with diameters of 150-500 nm by EELS and CL in an electron microscope and quantify the EELS/CL ratio, which corresponds to the ratio of full to radiative damping of the breathing mode. For the investigated diameter range, we find the CL signal to increase by about 1 order of magnitude, in agreement with numerical simulations. Due to reciprocity, our findings corroborate former optical experiments and enable a quantitative understanding of the light coupling of dark plasmonic modes.
In recent
years, focused electron
probes have opened new avenues toward the spectral analysis of nanostructures
with broadband optical sensitivity. Electron energy loss spectroscopy
(EELS) in a scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) (see Figure a) provides information
with nanometer spatial resolution and sub-eV spectral resolution.
The EELS signal is proportional to the photonic local density of states
(LDOS), projected along the electron beam direction.[1,2] EELS thus provides access to all linear optical properties of nano-objects
and has been applied to probe highly localized fields, in particular
plasmon eigenmodes in nanostructures.[3,4] Thanks to the
unprecedented spatial resolution of STEM-EELS, the classification
of plasmon modes on flat nanoparticles into edge and film modes could
be derived[5] and their correspondence to
the dispersion relations of straight edges and extended films, respectively,
was found.[6,7] The introduction of 3D EELS imaging based
on tomographic reconstruction has further enriched the field.[8−10] A related technique is cathodoluminescence (CL),[11] relying on photon emission upon electron excitation (Figure a). In a STEM, CL
probes plasmon eigenmodes with the same high spatial resolution as
EELS and even better energy resolution that is not limited by the
exciting electron beam.[12] CL is related
to the radiative part of the LDOS.[11,13] Therefore, the comparison of EELS and CL provides complementary
information on the optical properties of plasmonic systems[13−15] that can be related to extinction and scattering cross sections,
respectively.[16,17] This, in turn, is closely related
to the respective contributions to damping in the system in terms
of radiation damping and full damping, i.e., the sum of the radiation
and ohmic contribution.[18,19]
Figure 1
Experimental methods
and spectroscopic maps of 30 nm thick silver
disks with diameters of 150–500 nm. (a) Sketches of experimental
EELS and CL setups: In EELS, the energy lost by the electrons transmitted
through the sample is analyzed by an electron spectrometer. In CL,
the energy of light emitted from the sample is analyzed. The light
is collected from above the sample within a limited detection range,
which excludes the propagation direction of the electrons. (b) HAADF
images, (c) EELS, and (d) CL maps of the RBM. The EELS and CL maps
are integrated over an energy window of ±0.25 eV around the RBM
peak energy, and the contrast range is normalized on the corresponding
RBM peak areas (for details on the normalization see Figure S1a in
the Supporting Information). The inner
area of the orange circles indicates the region with the highest RBM
signal.
Experimental methods
and spectroscopic maps of 30 nm thick silver
disks with diameters of 150–500 nm. (a) Sketches of experimental
EELS and CL setups: In EELS, the energy lost by the electrons transmitted
through the sample is analyzed by an electron spectrometer. In CL,
the energy of light emitted from the sample is analyzed. The light
is collected from above the sample within a limited detection range,
which excludes the propagation direction of the electrons. (b) HAADF
images, (c) EELS, and (d) CL maps of the RBM. The EELS and CL maps
are integrated over an energy window of ±0.25 eV around the RBM
peak energy, and the contrast range is normalized on the corresponding
RBM peak areas (for details on the normalization see Figure S1a in
the Supporting Information). The inner
area of the orange circles indicates the region with the highest RBM
signal.In this Article, we discuss a
combined EELS/CL study to characterize
light coupling of radial breathing modes (RBMs) in silver nanodisks.
RBMs have zero net dipole moment. In disks much smaller than the light
wavelength, they are thus dark modes that do not couple to light.
However, increasing size gives rise to retardation, thus making the
RBM bright.[20,21] We find that with increasing
size (150–500 nm) the EELS signal does not change significantly,
but the CL signal increases by about 1 order of magnitude, corresponding
to increased scattering[22] and thus radiation
damping. To quantify the light coupling properties of RBMs, we introduce
EELS/CL ratios that we obtain from different disk sizes and support
the experimental results with numerical simulations. The direct measurement
of the bright vs dark properties of plasmonic modes will benefit not
only their fundamental understanding but also their use in processes
such as surface-enhanced fluorescence or surface-enhanced Raman scattering
and in applications such as biosensing.
Experimental Section
The nanodisks were fabricated by electron beam lithography on a
15 nm thick Si3N4 substrate. The disk height
was fixed at 30 nm, and the diameter was varied between 150 and 500
nm. We performed EELS and CL experiments on a VG STEM machine at 100
kV acceleration voltage. All the data shown hereafter have been synthesized
from EELS and CL spectral images taken on the same disks but at different
times. For numerical simulations, we used the MNPBEM toolbox,[23] which relies on the boundary element method.
Details are given in the Methods section.
Results
and Discussion
Nanodisks possess high symmetry and are thus
ideal geometries to
investigate canonical plasmonic behavior. RBMs have a zero net dipole
moment and are therefore dark modes (i.e., they do not couple to light)
in disks much smaller than the light wavelength. Optical spectroscopy
data have shown that for disks with a 200 nm diameter and inclined
light incidence with respect to the disk surface, retardation allows
RBM excitations by light,[24] while no excitation
was achieved for smaller disks. Considering the reciprocity principle,
RBMs excited locally, e.g., by a fast electron beam, should therefore
radiate light into the same inclined direction from where it could
be excited optically, as long as a minimum nanodisk size (where retardation
becomes relevant) is considered. We thus compare EELS and CL on single
nanodisks with varying diameters to quantify the size-dependent retardation
effect and thus the light-coupling properties of RBMs.We start
with a direct comparison of the RBM maps in Figure , for nanodisk diameters of
150–500 nm (high-angle annular dark-field, HAADF, images in Figure b). The EELS maps
in Figure c show the
RBM intensities (highest within the orange circle) that roughly remain
the same for all disk sizes. We note that signals from neighboring
plasmon modes contribute within the spectral window of the maps. These
are higher order edge modes for the larger disks (i.e., periodically
varying intensity along the circumference). For the smaller disks
the surface plasmon SP1 (ref (6) and compare Figure ) causes an additional signal homogeneously
distributed over the disk surface, so that the RBM signal at the disk
center is poorly visible. The orange circles delineate the RBM area
to clearly separate it from other mode contributions. The behavior
of the CL signal is markedly different: being virtually absent for
the smallest disk, it strongly increases with increasing disk diameter
(Figure d). The slight
oval shape as well as the noncentric emission maximum for the 400
and 500 nm disks comes from a small sample drift. We discuss a more
detailed interpretation of the RBM maps in the next-to-last two paragraphs
of this Article.
Figure 2
EELS vs CL measurements on a 500 nm diameter silver disk
on a Si3N4 membrane: (a) EELS and (b) CL maps
and spectra.
Maps A–C (top) extracted at energies given by the black arrows
in the spectra (bottom) and integrated over a constant energy width
(colored area below the spectra) correspond to an edge (A), film (B),
and mixed edge/film (C) mode with distinct mode pattern. The spectra
originate from regions as indicated in the inset, i.e., edge (green),
half radial distance (red), and center (blue) of the disk. D, Q, SP1, SP2, and BP correspond to the dipolar, quadrupolar,
antisymmetric surface, symmetric surface, and bulk plasmon mode, respectively.
EELS vs CL measurements on a 500 nm diameter silver disk
on a Si3N4 membrane: (a) EELS and (b) CL maps
and spectra.
Maps A–C (top) extracted at energies given by the black arrows
in the spectra (bottom) and integrated over a constant energy width
(colored area below the spectra) correspond to an edge (A), film (B),
and mixed edge/film (C) mode with distinct mode pattern. The spectra
originate from regions as indicated in the inset, i.e., edge (green),
half radial distance (red), and center (blue) of the disk. D, Q, SP1, SP2, and BP correspond to the dipolar, quadrupolar,
antisymmetric surface, symmetric surface, and bulk plasmon mode, respectively.To understand this finding, we
first include the full experimental
spectral range in our analysis. For an example of a single silver
nanodisk, 500 nm in diameter, the EELS (a) and CL (b) data are depicted
in Figure . We observe
that, first, EELS and CL maps at three different mode energies (A–C)
give similar mode patterns, as shown in the top row of Figure . While map A has the highest
intensity along the disk circumference, mode B shows an additional
feature in the center, and mode C exhibits a ring-shaped intensity
distribution at half radial distance (R/2). Second,
EELS and CL spectra obtained from specific regions on the particle
are quite similar. The green spectra correspond to the edge, the red
spectra to the region at R/2, and the blue spectra
to the disk center, as indicated in the inset. Nonradiating modes
are evidently missing in the CL data, which include the surface plasmons
SP1 at 2.9 eV (antisymmetric mode) and SP2 at
3.35 eV (symmetric mode) and the bulk plasmon BP at 3.75 eV.[6] Energies below 1.4 eV could not be detected by
the CL setup.In accordance with former work[5] we assign
mode A to an edge mode of third order (hexapole). The first- and second-order
edge modes (dipole and quadrupole) are well resolved in the EELS data
(green spectrum, D and Q) but are outside the CL detection range.
Mode B is the RBM (a film mode of first order), and mode C is a mixed
edge/film mode, also referred to as (0, 1) and (1, 1) modes, respectively.[5] For both data sets, mode patterns and spectral
signatures are thus mostly identical, in accordance with previous
work on EELS and CL.[16] Importantly, however,
the RBM CL signal is quite strong (B, blue spectrum in Figure b), which can readily be assigned
to retardation-induced light coupling, given the disk diameter of
500 nm.Aiming at a quantization of the light-coupling size-dependence,
we now trace the signal intensity of the RBM as a function of the
disk diameters for EELS and CL. EELS and CL spectra for all nanodisk
diameters 150–500 nm are shown in Figure . Experimental data, again from three different
disk regions, i.e., disk center (blue), along the circumference at R/2 (red), and the edge region (green), are displayed in Figure a. For a detailed
description of the spectrum normalization for the EELS and CL data
see the Supporting Information (“Normalization”
section). On one hand, the peak positions of the RBM shift in a similar
manner for both EELS and CL, as indicated by the blue arrows. On the
other hand, the different RBM peak intensities in EELS and CL are
evident from the spectra. In particular, the CL RBM peak intensity
strongly increases with increasing disk size, while EELS shows an
almost constant RBM intensity for all disk diameters. We note that
all plasmon eigenmodes discussed in this work are below 3 eV, and
therefore damping due to interband transitions is not to be expected.
The simulations plotted in Figure b reproduce the measured trend. While for a disk diameter
of 400 nm an intense RBM peak is found in the simulated CL spectrum,
the peak maximum is reduced by over 90% for the disk diameter of 150
nm (see Figure S1b in the Supporting Information). In addition, in the simulations the spectra originating from the
disk edge (green spectra) clearly resolve the dipolar edge mode for
EELS and CL (lowest energy peak in each spectrum), while the higher
order edge modes are less pronounced in the case of CL. This is valid
in particular for the smaller disk diameters, indicating the weakly
radiating character for these modes. In accordance with the experimental
setup, light detection is considered in the simulations in the half-space
above the sample, excluding the hole at the topmost position where
the electron beam passes (see Methods). The
agreement between experiment and theory but also the mismatch in particular
for the CL edge spectra are further discussed in the Supporting Information (see “Agreement between simulation
and experiment” section and Figure S4). This includes spatial
averaging, defects within the sample, and the lack of knowledge on
the exact angular detection range as possible reasons for the mismatch
in the CL edge spectra.
Figure 3
Size-dependent EELS and CL spectra. (a) Experimental
EELS and CL
spectra of Ag disks with diameters as indicated. The spectra correspond
to the center (blue), R/2 (red), and edge (green)
region of the disks. (b) Corresponding simulated EELS and CL spectra.
The blue arrows are guides to the eye.
Size-dependent EELS and CL spectra. (a) Experimental
EELS and CL
spectra of Ag disks with diameters as indicated. The spectra correspond
to the center (blue), R/2 (red), and edge (green)
region of the disks. (b) Corresponding simulated EELS and CL spectra.
The blue arrows are guides to the eye.To further analyze the size-dependent light-coupling properties
of RBMs, we plot the CL-to-EELS ratio of the RBM signal in Figure for both simulated
(dashed) and experimental (solid) data. The signals used for the ratio
values are summarized in Figure S1. We
apply for the experimental CL-to-EELS ratio values a modified EELS
signal Icenter – I (instead of Icenter only), which we obtain by subtracting the R/2 spectrum from the center spectrum. This removes the contribution
of the neighboring surface plasmon SP1 (compare red and
blue EEL spectra in Figure a). Thereby, we extract an EELS signal for each disk diameter
that originates from the RBM only. The experimental CL-to-EELS ratio
values are renormalized to the simulated value of the 400 nm diameter
disk, using the same normalization factor for all experimental ratio
values. With the normalization, the experimental and the simulated
data agree very well. We note that an alternative way to analyze the
data is via the center-to-edge signal ratio, leading basically to
the same results (Supporting Information, “Center-to-edge ratio”, Figure S2). In any case,
the CL-to-EELS ratio increases with disk diameter, showing a concurrent
increase in scattering strength and radiation damping of the RBM.
Increasing the nanodisk diameter from 150 to 500 nm this ratio increases
by roughly 1 order of magnitude, in agreement with recent theoretical
work on nanodisk RBMs.[21] This clearly demonstrates
that RBMs that are dark in small nanodisks can efficiently couple
to light for larger disk sizes.
Figure 4
Ratio of CL to EELS signal of the RBM
as a function of disk size
for the experimental (solid) and simulated (dashed) data. Experimental
ratios have been normalized so that the value for the disk diameter
of 400 nm coincides with the simulated result.
Ratio of CL to EELS signal of the RBM
as a function of disk size
for the experimental (solid) and simulated (dashed) data. Experimental
ratios have been normalized so that the value for the disk diameter
of 400 nm coincides with the simulated result.Finally, we discuss the direction of light emission from
the nanodisk
plasmon modes excited by fast electrons. Figure a shows two simulated CL spectra from the
edge (green) and center (blue) regions of a silver nanodisk (30 nm
thick, 200 nm in diameter, on a 15 nm thin Si3N4 substrate modeled as another disk, 700 nm in diameter), where the
light signal emitted in all directions (4π sr) was considered
(for simulations of other disk sizes see Figure S3 in the Supporting Information). To assign the plasmon
modes to the peaks (1)–(3), we plot in Figure b the corresponding charge distribution.
From that we attribute the dipolar, quadrupolar, and RBM mode to the
peaks (1)–(3), respectively. Heuristically, EELS and CL probe
the absolute value of the eigencharge distribution.[14] For the RBM mode, the eigencharge density is much weaker
on the edge than in the center, leading to an expected much stronger
contrast in the center than on the edge, as confirmed by simulations
in Figure b (3). Figure c illustrates the
emission patterns of the modes by plotting the energy flux density
of the electromagnetic field. We find that the dipole mode emission
is fairly symmetric, while the quadrupolar mode shows two higher intensity
lobes in the direction opposing the beam position, in accordance with
recently observed directional emission on gold nanodisks.[25] Similar to the RBM, the quadrupolar mode is
of dark character for small particles, corresponding to smaller CL
intensity for decreasing disk size (Figure S3). The RBM emits mostly into the substrate, with a maximum at a polar
angle θ of 135° and a weaker emission into the upper direction
with an emission maximum at θ = 45°. The RBM emission into
the upper direction is strongly reduced for smaller disks, virtually
disappearing for a disk diameter of 100 nm (see Figure S3 in the Supporting Information), in accordance with the
small CL intensity measured for small disks. At θ = 0°,
i.e., in the direction perpendicular to the surface, there is no emission
even for larger disk diameters, as expected from the RBM charge symmetry.
It is thus evident that an RBM cannot be excited by a plane wave under
perpendicular incidence for all disk sizes, while it can be excited
by a plane wave with tilted incidence for large disks. In general,
these results emphasize the reciprocity of data from CL and optical
spectroscopy.[24]
Figure 5
Light emission profiles
from nanodisks. (a) Simulated CL spectra
of a 30 nm thick Ag disk, 200 nm in diameter, from the edge (green)
and the center (blue) region as indicated in (b). (b) Surface charge
distribution of the dipolar (1), quadrupolar (2), and breathing mode
(3), corresponding to the three peak energies in (a); the dashed arrows
indicate position and direction of the exciting electron beam. (c)
Emission patterns of the plasmon modes (1)–(3), with the color
reflecting the absolute value of the energy flux density, each normalized
to its maximum (red color). The relative intensity scale is given
by the factors as depicted, indicating the lowest overall emission
for the RBM (3).
Light emission profiles
from nanodisks. (a) Simulated CL spectra
of a 30 nm thick Ag disk, 200 nm in diameter, from the edge (green)
and the center (blue) region as indicated in (b). (b) Surface charge
distribution of the dipolar (1), quadrupolar (2), and breathing mode
(3), corresponding to the three peak energies in (a); the dashed arrows
indicate position and direction of the exciting electron beam. (c)
Emission patterns of the plasmon modes (1)–(3), with the color
reflecting the absolute value of the energy flux density, each normalized
to its maximum (red color). The relative intensity scale is given
by the factors as depicted, indicating the lowest overall emission
for the RBM (3).It seems counterintuitive
that the RBM, which for obvious symmetry
reasons does not have a dipolar moment, can radiate. Indeed, as is
the case for the edge modes, the most intense modes are usually dipolar
in nature, and often, when the particle is small with respect to the
light wavelength, only the dipolar radiation is detectable. This is
because the multipolar decomposition in the far field corresponds
to a polynomial series of terms with increasing power of products
of k and R, with k = ω/c and R being the radius
of the disk. For small R, only the dipolar component
prevails so that in the case of the small disks, indeed, the RBM mode
is very dark due to the missing dipolar contribution. As the size
of the disk increases, the higher order components quickly increase,
making the mode quite bright.
Conclusions
In summary, we have
shown by a combined EELS/CL study how the dark
mode character of plasmonic nanodisks is relieved with increasing
disk diameter. Expressed as a CL/EELS signal ratio, RBM light coupling
increases for almost 1 order of magnitude when increasing the disk
diameter from 150 nm to 500 nm. Correspondingly, scattering and radiation
damping of the disk increases, which are important aspects in the
design of plasmonic nanostructures and their application in, for example,
surface-enhanced spectroscopies. Generally, combining EELS and CL
with optical scattering and extinction spectroscopy provides a conceptual
toolbox, relying on reciprocity to assess the full breadth of the
properties of plasmonic modes.
Methods
Silver nanodisks (30 nm
thick) with diameters ranging from 150
to 500 nm were prepared by electron beam lithography in a RAITH eLINE+
system, using a poly(methyl methacrylate) resist on a 15 nm thick
silicon nitride (Si3N4) membrane and a standard
silver evaporation and lift-off procedure.[26] Silver was evaporated at a vacuum pressure of approximately 5 ×
10–6 mbar with an evaporation rate of 10 Å/s
and no sample cooling.The samples were studied in a VG HB 501
STEM, equipped with a cold
field emission gun (energy full-width at half-maximum <300 meV)
at 100 keV electron beam energy. Both, EELS and CL systems are homemade
and fitted to the same microscope.[16,27] The EELS system
is based on a 666 Gatan spectrometer, fitted with custom-made filter
and multipole power supply and a direct, optical-fiber free, optical
coupling to a CCD camera. The CL system[28] consists of a parabolic mirror that can be put into optical focus
through a three-axis high-precision stage. Light reflected by the
mirror is sent onto one end of an optical fiber bundle. The other
end of the optical fiber is fitted to an optical spectrometer that
is not fixed on the STEM column. All experiments on the same disks
have been performed on the same day. As the acquisition parameters
were very different, EELS and CL experiments have been made in sequences.
All data presented in this work stem from spectral images. EELS spectra
have been spectrally realigned and deconvoluted from the zero-loss
peak, using a Richardson–Lucy deconvolution algorithm (see
Figure S5 in the Supporting Information).[29] CL spectra have been converted from
nm to eV units by applying a λ2 prefactor (see Supporting Information, “Normalization”
section).The EELS and CL experiments were modeled by calculating
numerically
the electric field induced by a fast electron source moving perpendicular
to single silver nanodisks lying on a Si3N4 membrane.
EELS spectra were obtained from the work done by the Lorentz force
on the fast electron source (eq 8 from ref (30)); CL spectra, from the radiant energy crossing
the portion of a sphere surface located at infinity (eq 50 from ref (30)). A fraction of the sphere
surface (1.2π sr of the upper half sphere, excluding the hole
at the topmost position where the electron beam passes) was taken
to mimic the actual detection angular spread used in the experiment
(schematically shown in Figure a). The calculations were performed using the Boundary Element
Method Maxwell equation solver[31] available
in the MNPBEM toolbox.[32] The Si3N4 membrane was modeled as a disk of relative permittivity
ε = 4 whose top facet is in contact with the bottom facet of
the silver nanodisk. The relative permittivity of silver was taken
from ref (33). The
nanodisk and substrate boundaries were meshed nonuniformly, with the
smallest mesh elements around the nanodisk edges. Particles with different
sizes were modeled by changing the nanodisk and substrate sizes while
keeping the same mesh. Convergent simulations were obtained by taking
the radius of the substrate disk 500 nm larger than the nanodisk radius
and by using mesh elements with areas of 3 nm2. As an example,
for a 200 nm large nanodisk, the nanodisk and substrate were discretized
respectively by about 6000 and (excluding the boundary in contact
with the nanodisk) 4500 elements. The edge spectra were calculated
for an electron position within the disk located 5 nm away from the
edge. The influence of the electron beam position, the damping, and
the angular detection range on the simulated CL spectra is discussed
in the Supporting Information (see “Agreement
between simulation and experiment” section and Figure S4).
Authors: Toon Coenen; David T Schoen; Sander A Mann; Said R K Rodriguez; Benjamin J M Brenny; Albert Polman; Mark L Brongersma Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2015-10-16 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Olivia Nicoletti; Francisco de la Peña; Rowan K Leary; Daniel J Holland; Caterina Ducati; Paul A Midgley Journal: Nature Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Franz-Philipp Schmidt; Harald Ditlbacher; Ulrich Hohenester; Andreas Hohenau; Ferdinand Hofer; Joachim R Krenn Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2012-10-03 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Franz-Philipp Schmidt; Harald Ditlbacher; Ulrich Hohenester; Andreas Hohenau; Ferdinand Hofer; Joachim R Krenn Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014-04-10 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Michel Bosman; Enyi Ye; Shu Fen Tan; Christian A Nijhuis; Joel K W Yang; Renaud Marty; Adnen Mlayah; Arnaud Arbouet; Christian Girard; Ming-Yong Han Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2013 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Sharmistha Chatterjee; Loredana Ricciardi; Julia I Deitz; Robert E A Williams; David W McComb; Giuseppe Strangi Journal: Nanoscale Adv Date: 2019-05-27
Authors: Alberto Martín-Jiménez; Antonio I Fernández-Domínguez; Koen Lauwaet; Daniel Granados; Rodolfo Miranda; Francisco J García-Vidal; Roberto Otero Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-02-24 Impact factor: 14.919