Literature DB >> 29607156

Clinical outcome comparison of patients with septic shock defined by the new sepsis-3 criteria and by previous criteria.

Seung Mok Ryoo1, Gu Hyun Kang2, Tae Gun Shin3, Sung Yeon Hwang3, Kyuseok Kim4, You Hwan Jo4, Yoo Seok Park5, Sung-Hyuk Choi6, Young Hoon Yoon6, Woon Yong Kwon7, Gil Joon Suh7, Tae Ho Lim8, Kap Su Han9, Han Sung Choi10, Sung Phil Chung5, Won Young Kim1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes between the new definition of sepsis-3 septic shock and the definition previously used from 1991 until recently.
METHODS: We conducted an observational study using a prospective, multi-center registry of septic shock from October 2015 to February 2017. Registry data were collected by 10 emergency departments (EDs) in tertiary hospitals that are members of the Korean Shock Society. Data on septic shock patients who met the previous septic shock definition were collected. The patients were divided into a sepsis-3 defined septic shock group, made up of those who met the new criteria for refractory hypotension with hyperlactatemia, and a group of those who met only the 1991 definition for septic shock. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality, and secondary outcomes were 28-day mortality and in-hospital mortality.
RESULTS: Of all 1,028 included patients, 574 (55.8%) met the septic shock criteria for sepsis-3, leaving 454 patients who met only the previous definition. Those who met the sepsis-3 criteria demonstrated higher comorbidity than those who met the previous definition (83.1% vs. 75.3%, P<0.01), but there was no difference in infection focus. The sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) (initial/maximal), the acute physiology, and the chronic health evaluation II scores were significantly higher in for those who met the sepsis-3 criteria [6.5±3.1 vs. 5.0±2.9, 9.3±3.8 vs. 6.6±3.4, and 20.0 (15.0-26.0) vs. 15.0 (10.0-20.3), respectively; P<0.01]. The 90-day mortality was significantly higher in the sepsis-3 group (32.1% vs. 23.3%; P<0.01). In-hospital and 28-day mortality were also higher in the sepsis-3 group (26.8% vs. 17.1% and 25.1% vs. 16.5%, respectively; P<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The new definition of septic shock successfully selected patients with greater severities and worse outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sepsis; mortality; prognosis; shock

Year:  2018        PMID: 29607156      PMCID: PMC5864585          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.01.96

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  30 in total

Review 1.  Lactate and shock state: the metabolic view.

Authors:  Bruno Levy
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.687

2.  The influence of a change in septic shock definitions on intensive care epidemiology and outcome: comparison of sepsis-2 and sepsis-3 definitions.

Authors:  Rob G H Driessen; Marcel C G van de Poll; Marianne F Mol; Walther N K A van Mook; Ronny M Schnabel
Journal:  Infect Dis (Lond)       Date:  2017-09-26

Review 3.  2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference.

Authors:  Mitchell M Levy; Mitchell P Fink; John C Marshall; Edward Abraham; Derek Angus; Deborah Cook; Jonathan Cohen; Steven M Opal; Jean-Louis Vincent; Graham Ramsay
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  New Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock: Continuing Evolution but With Much Still to Be Done.

Authors:  Edward Abraham
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.

Authors:  Andrew Rhodes; Laura E Evans; Waleed Alhazzani; Mitchell M Levy; Massimo Antonelli; Ricard Ferrer; Anand Kumar; Jonathan E Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Mark E Nunnally; Bram Rochwerg; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Derek C Angus; Djillali Annane; Richard J Beale; Geoffrey J Bellinghan; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig Coopersmith; Daniel P De Backer; Craig J French; Seitaro Fujishima; Herwig Gerlach; Jorge Luis Hidalgo; Steven M Hollenberg; Alan E Jones; Dilip R Karnad; Ruth M Kleinpell; Younsuck Koh; Thiago Costa Lisboa; Flavia R Machado; John J Marini; John C Marshall; John E Mazuski; Lauralyn A McIntyre; Anthony S McLean; Sangeeta Mehta; Rui P Moreno; John Myburgh; Paolo Navalesi; Osamu Nishida; Tiffany M Osborn; Anders Perner; Colleen M Plunkett; Marco Ranieri; Christa A Schorr; Maureen A Seckel; Christopher W Seymour; Lisa Shieh; Khalid A Shukri; Steven Q Simpson; Mervyn Singer; B Taylor Thompson; Sean R Townsend; Thomas Van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; W Joost Wiersinga; Janice L Zimmerman; R Phillip Dellinger
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria in defining severe sepsis.

Authors:  Kirsi-Maija Kaukonen; Michael Bailey; David Pilcher; D Jamie Cooper; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicenter, prospective study. Working group on "sepsis-related problems" of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

Authors:  J L Vincent; A de Mendonça; F Cantraine; R Moreno; J Takala; P M Suter; C L Sprung; F Colardyn; S Blecher
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Outcome of delayed resuscitation bundle achievement in emergency department patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Chang Hwan Sohn; Seung Mok Ryoo; Dong Woo Seo; Jae Ho Lee; Bum Jin Oh; Kyoung Soo Lim; Jin Won Huh; Won Young Kim
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.397

9.  Severe sepsis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome in emergency department patients with suspected severe infection.

Authors:  Patrik Gille-Johnson; Karin E Hansson; Bengt Gårdlund
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis       Date:  2012-10-31

10.  Increased aerobic glycolysis through beta2 stimulation is a common mechanism involved in lactate formation during shock states.

Authors:  Bruno Levy; Olivier Desebbe; Chantal Montemont; Sebastien Gibot
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.454

View more
  8 in total

1.  Basics of changes in hemodynamic monitoring in sepsis care.

Authors:  Jae Chol Yoon; Won Young Kim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Prognostic factors for late death in septic shock survivors: a multi-center, prospective, registry-based observational study.

Authors:  Sang-Min Kim; Seung Mok Ryoo; Tae Gun Shin; Yoo Seok Park; You Hwan Jo; Tae Ho Lim; Sung Phil Chung; Sung-Hyuk Choi; Gil Joon Suh; Won Young Kim
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2021-10-03       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  The usefulness of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin to predict prognosis in septic shock patients: A multicenter prospective registry-based observational study.

Authors:  Seung Mok Ryoo; Kap Su Han; Shin Ahn; Tae Gun Shin; Sung Yeon Hwang; Sung Phil Chung; Yoon Jung Hwang; Yoo Seok Park; You Hwan Jo; Hyung Lan Chang; Gil Joon Suh; Kyoung Min You; Gu Hyun Kang; Sung-Hyuk Choi; Tae Ho Lim; Won Young Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Application of Sepsis-3 Criteria to Korean Patients with Critical Illnesses.

Authors:  Jae Yeol Kim; Hwan Il Kim; Gee Young Suh; Sang Won Yoon; Tae-Yop Kim; Sang Haak Lee; Jae Young Moon; Jae-Young Kwon; Sungwon Na; Ho Geol Ryu; Jisook Park; Younsuck Koh
Journal:  Acute Crit Care       Date:  2019-01-29

5.  Prognosis and Risk Factors of Sepsis Patients in Chinese ICUs: A Retrospective Analysis of a Cohort Database.

Authors:  Zeyu Qu; Yibing Zhu; Meiping Wang; Wen Li; Bo Zhu; Li Jiang; Xiuming Xi
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.533

6.  Relationship between time of emergency department admission and adherence to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundle in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Je Sung You; Yoo Seok Park; Sung Phil Chung; Hye Sun Lee; Soyoung Jeon; Won Young Kim; Tae Gun Shin; You Hwan Jo; Gu Hyun Kang; Sung Hyuk Choi; Gil Joon Suh; Byuk Sung Ko; Kap Su Han; Jong Hwan Shin; Taeyoung Kong
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Pulse pressure during the initial resuscitative period in patients with septic shock treated with a protocol-driven resuscitation bundle therapy.

Authors:  Sang-Hun Lee; Youn-Jung Kim; Gi Na Yu; Jae Cheon Jeon; Won Young Kim
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.884

Review 8.  The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: research priorities for the administration, epidemiology, scoring and identification of sepsis.

Authors:  Mark E Nunnally; Ricard Ferrer; Greg S Martin; Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Flavia R Machado; Daniel De Backer; Craig M Coopersmith; Clifford S Deutschman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2021-07-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.