| Literature DB >> 29606860 |
Bayu Anggileo Pramesona1,2, Surasak Taneepanichskul1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of religious intervention on depressive symptoms and quality of life (QOL) among Indonesian elderly in nursing homes (NHs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a quasi-experimental study with repeated measures. Sixty elderly residents at three NHs in three districts in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, with the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) score of 5-11 were recruited and purposively assigned to the religious intervention group (combining 36 sessions of listening to Qur'anic recital and 3 sessions of attending a sermon by a preacher, n=30) and the control group (treatment as usual/TAU, n=30). The primary outcome was depression, measured by a short form GDS questionnaire. The QOL as the secondary outcome was assessed by the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF Indonesian version. Both groups were evaluated at the baseline, 4th, 8th, and 12th week after the interventions were performed.Entities:
Keywords: Indonesia; Qur’anic recital intervention; geriatric depression; nursing home; quality of life; religious leader approach
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29606860 PMCID: PMC5868573 DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S162946
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Interv Aging ISSN: 1176-9092 Impact factor: 4.458
Figure 1Flow diagram of the present study.
Abbreviations: NH, nursing home; GDS-15, 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale; QOL, quality of life.
Baseline comparison on sociodemographic characteristics of respondents (n=60)
| Sociodemographic characteristics | Intervention group (n=30) n, (%) | Control group (n=30) n, (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | ||||
| ≥80 years | 8 (13.3) | 6 (10) | 0.373 | 0.542 |
| <80 years | 22 (36.7) | 24 (40) | ||
| Gender | ||||
| Female | 25 (41.7) | 21 (35.0) | 1.491 | 0.222 |
| Male | 5 (8.3) | 9 (15.0) | ||
| Marital status | ||||
| No partner | 28 (46.7) | 27 (45.0) | 0.218 | 0.640 |
| With partner | 2 (3.3) | 3 (5.0) | ||
| Education level | ||||
| No or low education | 26 (43.3) | 27 (45.0) | 0.162 | 0.688 |
| Higher education | 4 (6.7) | 3 (5.0) | ||
| Social support resource | ||||
| None | 17 (28.3) | 12 (20.0) | 1.669 | 0.196 |
| From family and/or others | 13 (21.7) | 18 (30.0) | ||
| Type of support | ||||
| None | 13 (21.7) | 11 (18.3) | 0.278 | 0.598 |
| Physical and/or financial | 17 (28.3) | 19 (31.7) | ||
| Physical illness | ||||
| ≥3 | 9 (15.0) | 15 (25.0) | 2.500 | 0.114 |
| <3 | 21 (35.0) | 15 (25.0) | ||
| Reason for living in NH | ||||
| Compulsion | 25 (41.7) | 27 (45.0) | 0.577 | 0.448 |
| Own willingness | 5 (8.3) | 3 (5.0) | ||
| Length of stay | ||||
| ≥4 years | 9 (15.0) | 14 (23.3) | 1.763 | 0.184 |
| <4 years | 21 (35.0) | 16 (26.7) | ||
| Perceived adequacy of care | ||||
| No | 11 (18.3) | 12 (20.0) | 0.071 | 0.791 |
| Yes | 19 (31.7) | 18 (30.0) |
Abbreviation: NH, nursing home.
Multiple comparisons on depression and QOL mean scores within and between groups (n=60)
| Variable measures | Intervention group (n=30) | Control group (n=30) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depression | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | |
| Baseline | 6.6 (2.1) | 7.4 (2.2) | 0.170 |
| Week 4 | 6.2 (2.0) | 7.3 (2.2) | 0.042 |
| Week 8 | 5.3 (1.7) | 6.8 (1.8) | 0.002 |
| Week 12 | 4.3 (1.2) | 6.6 (1.7) | <0.001 |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| Wilcoxon signed-rank test post-hoc | A ( | A ( | |
| B ( | B ( | ||
| C ( | C ( | ||
| Overall QOL | |||
| Baseline | 44.2 (5.3) | 42.2 (4.1) | 0.113 |
| Week 4 | 47.3 (5.0) | 44.2 (3.9) | 0.007 |
| Week 8 | 53.5 (4.8) | 48.2 (3.1) | <0.001 |
| Week 12 | 58.9 (3.9) | 51.3 (2.5) | <0.001 |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| Bonferroni post-hoc analysis | A ( | A ( | |
| B ( | B ( | ||
| C ( | C ( | ||
| Physical health QOL domain | |||
| Baseline | 44.9 (6.9) | 42.5 (5.0) | 0.126 |
| Week 4 | 47.4 (7.4) | 44.6 (4.5) | 0.085 |
| Week 8 | 51.3 (6.1) | 47.4 (4.0) | 0.005 |
| Week 12 | 55.8 (5.1) | 49.4 (4.5) | <0.001 |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| Bonferroni post-hoc analysis | A ( | A ( | |
| B ( | B ( | ||
| C ( | C ( | ||
| Psychological QOL domain | |||
| Baseline | 41.1 (6.3) | 37.2 (9.4) | 0.069 |
| Week 4 | 44.5 (6.3) | 38.9 (8.5) | 0.006 |
| Week 8 | 50.6 (5.1) | 43.6 (7.6) | <0.001 |
| Week 12 | 56.4 (5.1) | 46.0 (5.4) | <0.001 |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| Bonferroni post-hoc analysis | A ( | A ( | |
| B ( | B ( | ||
| C ( | C ( | ||
| Social relationship QOL domain | |||
| Baseline | 45.6 (7.5) | 47.7 (7.0) | 0.285 |
| Week 4 | 49.9 (6.8) | 48.7 (7.4) | 0.505 |
| Week 8 | 58.5 (8.0) | 54.2 (5.6) | 0.021 |
| Week 12 | 65.2 (6.8) | 57.4 (6.3) | <0.001 |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| Bonferroni post-hoc analysis | A ( | A ( | |
| B ( | B ( | ||
| C ( | C ( | ||
| Environment QOL domain | |||
| Baseline | 44.8 (8.9) | 41.5 (4.6) | 0.073 |
| Week 4 | 47.6 (8.2) | 44.4 (4.2) | 0.057 |
| Week 8 | 53.8 (7.2) | 48.0 (4.4) | <0.001 |
| Week 12 | 58.3 (6.5) | 52.6 (4.1) | <0.001 |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| Bonferroni post-hoc analysis | A ( | A ( | |
| B ( | B ( | ||
| C ( | C ( |
Notes: A: Baseline versus week 4; B: Baseline versus week 8; C: Baseline versus week 12.
Mann–Whitney U-test;
Friedman test; All QOL measurement comparisons were used independent t-test and repeated measurement ANOVA.
Significant at P<0.05.
Abbreviations: QOL, quality of life; ANOVA, analysis of variance.
Figure 2The effect of religious intervention on depression over time (intervention versus control group).
Figure 3The effect of religious intervention on quality of life (intervention versus control group).