Howard T Hurst1, Stephen Atkins2, Ben D Dickinson3. 1. School of Sport and Wellbeing, University of Central Lancashire, UK. Electronic address: HTHurst@uclan.ac.uk. 2. School of Health Sciences, University of Salford, UK. 3. School of Sport and Wellbeing, University of Central Lancashire, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the magnitude of translational and rotational head accelerations during downhill mountain biking. DESIGN: Observational study. METHODS: Sixteen male downhill cyclists (age 26.4±8.4years; stature 179.4±7.2cm; mass 75.3±5.9kg) were monitored during two rounds of the British Downhill Series. Riders performed two runs on each course wearing a triaxial accelerometer behind the right ear. The means of the two runs for each course were used to determine differences between courses for mean and maximum peak translational (g) and rotational accelerations (rad/s2) and impact duration for each course. RESULTS: Significant differences (p<0.05) were revealed for the mean number of impacts (>10g), FW=12.5±7.6, RYF=42.8±27.4 (t(22.96)=-4.70; p<0.001; 95% CI=17.00 to 43.64); maximum peak rotational acceleration, FW=6805.4±3073.8rad/s2, RYF=9799.9±3381.7rad/s2 (t(32)=-2.636; p=0.01; 95% CI=680.31 to 5308.38); mean acceleration duration FW=4.7±1.2ms, RYF=6.5±1.4ms (t(32)=-4.05; p<0.001; 95% CI=0.91 to 2.76) and maximum acceleration duration, FW=11.6±4.5ms, RYF=21.2±9.1 (t(29.51)=-4.06; p=0.001; 95% CI=4.21 to 14.94). No other significant differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that downhill riders may be at risk of sustaining traumatic brain injuries and course design influences the number and magnitude of accelerations.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the magnitude of translational and rotational head accelerations during downhill mountain biking. DESIGN: Observational study. METHODS: Sixteen male downhill cyclists (age 26.4±8.4years; stature 179.4±7.2cm; mass 75.3±5.9kg) were monitored during two rounds of the British Downhill Series. Riders performed two runs on each course wearing a triaxial accelerometer behind the right ear. The means of the two runs for each course were used to determine differences between courses for mean and maximum peak translational (g) and rotational accelerations (rad/s2) and impact duration for each course. RESULTS: Significant differences (p<0.05) were revealed for the mean number of impacts (>10g), FW=12.5±7.6, RYF=42.8±27.4 (t(22.96)=-4.70; p<0.001; 95% CI=17.00 to 43.64); maximum peak rotational acceleration, FW=6805.4±3073.8rad/s2, RYF=9799.9±3381.7rad/s2 (t(32)=-2.636; p=0.01; 95% CI=680.31 to 5308.38); mean acceleration duration FW=4.7±1.2ms, RYF=6.5±1.4ms (t(32)=-4.05; p<0.001; 95% CI=0.91 to 2.76) and maximum acceleration duration, FW=11.6±4.5ms, RYF=21.2±9.1 (t(29.51)=-4.06; p=0.001; 95% CI=4.21 to 14.94). No other significant differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that downhill riders may be at risk of sustaining traumatic brain injuries and course design influences the number and magnitude of accelerations.
Authors: Paul Craven; Joseph Hansroth; Kimberly D Quedado; Christopher S Goode; Shane Dragan; Aaron Monseau; Brenden Balcik; Nicholas Chill; Scott W Findley Journal: Cureus Date: 2021-04-03
Authors: Jack Hardwicke; Brett Anthony Baxter; Tim Gamble; Howard Thomas Hurst Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 3.390