Literature DB >> 29606322

Valve performance classification in 630 subcoronary Ross patients over 22 years.

Hans-Hinrich Sievers1, Ulrich Stierle2, Michael Petersen2, Stefan Klotz2, Doreen Richardt2, Michael Diwoky2, Efstratios I Charitos3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To define the function of the "Ross valves" and its clinical meaning in a practical valve performance classification as part of the outcome analysis.
METHODS: From 1994 to 2017, 630 consecutive patients underwent the subcoronary Ross procedure at our institution. The valve performance classification combines hemodynamics, symptoms, and management criteria. Median follow-up was 12.5 years (maximum 22.3 years, 7404 patient-years, 99.4% completeness).
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 44.7 ± 11.9 years. Hospital deaths was 0.3% (n = 2). Twenty years after the operation survival was 73.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.4%-81.6%) and statistically not different from the age- and gender-matched general population; freedom from reoperation was 85.9% (95% CI, 80.2%-92.0%; 0.6% per patient-year), 89.8% (95% CI, 84.3%-95.7%) for autograft, and 91.0% (95% CI, 86.3%-96.0%) for homograft. Preoperative annulus diameter, aortic regurgitation, annulus reinforcement, sinotubular junction reinforcement, and bicuspid aortic valve type were no significant risk factors for reoperation. At 20 years the probability of a patient being in valve performance class I to IV was 5%, 74%, 19%, and 1%, respectively. Time to reoperation was not different in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves; preoperative aortic stenosis tended to have better outcome of autograft function.
CONCLUSIONS: These up to 22 years data show that the subcoronary Ross procedure continues to provide an excellent tissue aortic valve replacement. The suggested valve performance classification emerged as a practical concept for outcome analysis with the probability of 79% being in the favorable class I or II at 20 years.
Copyright © 2018 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ross procedure; hemodynamics; long-term data; subcoronary technique; valve performance classification

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29606322     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  9 in total

Review 1.  Current spectrum, challenges and new developments in the surgical care of adults with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Jürgen Hörer
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-12

2.  Ross Procedure vs Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amine Mazine; Rodolfo V Rocha; Ismail El-Hamamsy; Maral Ouzounian; Bobby Yanagawa; Deepak L Bhatt; Subodh Verma; Jan O Friedrich
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 14.676

3.  The reinforced full-root technique for the Ross operation: surgical considerations and operative insights.

Authors:  Markus Liebrich; Efstratios I Charitos; Christoph Dingemann; Detlef Roser; Joerg Seeburger; Wolfgang Hemmer; Vladimir Voth
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-07

Review 4.  A management framework for left sided endocarditis: a narrative review.

Authors:  Francesco Nappi; Cristiano Spadaccio; Marc R Moon
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-12

5.  Valve-sparing reoperations for failed pulmonary autografts.

Authors:  Andrew B Goldstone; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-02-12

Review 6.  Understanding Pulmonary Autograft Remodeling After the Ross Procedure: Stick to the Facts.

Authors:  Lucas Van Hoof; Peter Verbrugghe; Elizabeth A V Jones; Jay D Humphrey; Stefan Janssens; Nele Famaey; Filip Rega
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-09

Review 7.  The effectiveness and safety of pulmonary autograft as living tissue in Ross procedure: a systematic review.

Authors:  Francesco Nappi; Adelaide Iervolino; Sanjeet Singh Avtaar Singh
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2022-02

Review 8.  Biomechanics of Pulmonary Autograft as Living Tissue: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Francesco Nappi; Sanjeet Singh Avtaar Singh
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-08

Review 9.  The Choice of Pulmonary Autograft in Aortic Valve Surgery: A State-of-the-Art Primer.

Authors:  Francesco Nappi; Sanjeet Singh Avtaar Singh; Francesca Bellomo; Pierluigi Nappi; Adelaide Iervolino; Christophe Acar
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.