Literature DB >> 29606049

Transbasal versus endoscopic endonasal versus combined approaches for olfactory groove meningiomas: importance of approach selection.

James K Liu1,2, Nicole A Silva1, Ilesha A Sevak1, Jean Anderson Eloy1,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE There has been much debate regarding the optimal surgical approach for resecting olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs). In this paper, the authors analyzed the factors involved in approach selection and reviewed the surgical outcomes in a series of OGMs. METHODS A retrospective review of 28 consecutive OGMs from a prospective database was conducted. Each tumor was treated via one of 3 approaches: transbasal approach (n = 15), pure endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA; n = 5), and combined (endoscope-assisted) transbasal-EEA (n = 8). RESULTS The mean tumor volume was greatest in the transbasal (92.02 cm3) and combined (101.15 cm3) groups. Both groups had significant lateral dural extension over the orbits (transbasal 73.3%, p < 0.001; combined 100%), while the transbasal group had the most cerebral edema (73.3%, p < 0.001) and vascular involvement (66.7%, p < 0.001), and the least presence of a cortical cuff (33.3%, p = 0.019). All tumors in the combined group were recurrent tumors that invaded into the sinonasal cavity. The purely EEA group had the smallest mean tumor volume (33.33 cm3), all with a cortical cuff and no lateral dural extension. Gross-total resection was achieved in 80% of transbasal, 100% of EEA, and 62.5% of combined cases. Near-total resection (> 95%) was achieved in 20% of transbasal and 37.5% of combined cases, all due to tumor adherence to the critical neurovascular structures. The rate of CSF leakage was 0% in the transbasal and combined groups, and there was 1 leak in the EEA group (20%), resulting in an overall CSF leakage rate of 3.6%. Olfaction was preserved in 66.7% in the transbasal group. There was no significant difference in length of stay or 30-day readmission rate between the 3 groups. The mean modified Rankin Scale score was 0.79 after the transbasal approach, 2.0 after EEA, and 2.4 after the combined approach (p = 0.0604). The mean follow-up was 14.5 months (range 1-76 months). CONCLUSIONS The transbasal approach provided the best clinical outcomes with the lowest rate of complications for large tumors (> 40 mm) and for smaller tumors (< 40 mm) with intact olfaction. The role of EEA appears to be limited to smaller, appropriately selected tumors in which olfaction is already absent. EEA also plays an important adjunctive role when combined with the transbasal approach for recurrent OGMs invading the sinonasal cavity. Careful patient selection using an individualized, tailored strategy is important to optimize surgical outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEA = endoscopic endonasal approach; GTR = gross-total resection; LOS = length of stay; NTR = near-total resection; OGM = olfactory groove meningioma; anterior skull base; combined approach; endoscopic endonasal approach; endoscopic skull base surgery; mRS = modified Rankin Scale; olfactory groove meningiomas; skull base meningiomas; transbasal approach

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29606049     DOI: 10.3171/2018.1.FOCUS17722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  8 in total

1.  The Endoscopic Endonasal Management of Anterior Skull Base Meningiomas.

Authors:  Matteo Zoli; Federica Guaraldi; Ernesto Pasquini; Giorgio Frank; Diego Mazzatenta
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-08-27

Review 2.  Modern endoscopic skull base neurosurgery.

Authors:  Rafael Martinez-Perez; Luis C Requena; Ricardo L Carrau; Daniel M Prevedello
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Endoscopic endonasal versus transcranial approach to resection of olfactory groove meningiomas: a systematic review.

Authors:  Aarti Purohit; Roshani Jha; Adham M Khalafallah; Carrie Price; Nicholas R Rowan; Debraj Mukherjee
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2019-11-10       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Minimally Invasive Approaches to Anterior Skull Base Meningiomas.

Authors:  Scott C Seaman; Muhammad S Ali; Anthony Marincovich; Luyuan Li; Jarrett E Walsh; Jeremy D W Greenlee
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-12-29

5.  The endoscope-assisted supraorbital "keyhole" approach for anterior skull base meningiomas: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Danyal Z Khan; Ivo S Muskens; Rania A Mekary; Amir H Zamanipoor Najafabadi; Adel E Helmy; Robert Reisch; Marike L D Broekman; Hani J Marcus
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  The transbasal approach to the anterior skull base: surgical outcome of a single-centre case series.

Authors:  A Kaywan Aftahy; Melanie Barz; Arthur Wagner; Julia S Bermeitinger; Claire Delbridge; Chiara Negwer; Bernhard Meyer; Jens Gempt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Resection of Olfactory Groove Meningiomas Through Unilateral vs. Bilateral Approaches: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Austin Y Feng; Sandy Wong; Sabir Saluja; Michael C Jin; Anthony Thai; Arjun V Pendharkar; Allen L Ho; Prasad Reddy; Allen D Efron
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  The interhemispheric fissure-surgical outcome of interhemispheric approaches.

Authors:  A Kaywan Aftahy; Melanie Barz; Arthur Wagner; Friederike Liesche-Starnecker; Chiara Negwer; Bernhard Meyer; Jens Gempt
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 3.042

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.