Literature DB >> 29606038

Voluntary Smoke-Free Measures Among Oklahoma Nightlife Owners: Barriers and Facilitators.

Carson Benowitz-Fredericks1, Julia McQuoid1, Nicolas Sheon1, Sarah Olson1, Pamela M Ling1.   

Abstract

Smoke-free policies prevent exposure to secondhand smoke and encourage tobacco cessation. Local smoke-free policies that are more comprehensive than statewide policies are not allowed in states with preemption, including Oklahoma, which has the sixth highest smoking prevalence in the United States. In states with preemption, voluntary smoke-free measures are encouraged, but little research exists on venue owners' and managers' views of such measures, particularly in nightlife businesses such as bars and nightclubs. This article draws from semistructured interviews with 23 Oklahoma bar owners and managers, examining perceived risks and benefits of adopting voluntary smoke-free measures in their venues. No respondents expressed awareness of preemption. Many reported that smoke-free bars and nightclubs were an inevitable societal trend, particularly as younger customers increasingly expected smoke-free venues. Business benefits such as decreased operating and cleaning costs, improved atmosphere, and employee efficiency were more convincing than improved employee health. Concerns that voluntary measures created an uneven playing field among venues competing for customers formed a substantial barrier to voluntary measures. Other barriers included concerns about lost revenue and fear of disloyalty to customers, particularly older smokers. Addressing business benefits and a level playing field may increase support for voluntary smoke-free nightlife measures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Oklahoma; bars; nightlife; preemption; smoke-free policies; smoking

Year:  2018        PMID: 29606038      PMCID: PMC6119530          DOI: 10.1177/1524839918764897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot Pract        ISSN: 1524-8399


  24 in total

1.  Nurses, smoking, and the workplace.

Authors:  Linda Sarna; Stella Aguinaga Bialous; Mary Ellen Wewers; Erika Sivarajan Froelicher; Leda Danao
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.228

2.  Why be smoke-free? A qualitative study of smoke-free restaurant owner and manager opinions.

Authors:  Hans H Johnson; Craig Becker; Lynn Inman; Karen Webb; Cindy Brady
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2008-03-27

3.  Post-ban self-reports on economic impact of smoke-free bars and restaurants are biased by pre-ban attitudes. A longitudinal study among employees.

Authors:  Ingeborg Lund; Karl Erik Lund
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 3.021

4.  Case studies from community coalitions: advancing local tobacco control policy in a preemptive state.

Authors:  Malinda R Douglas; Candida A Manion; Vanessa D Hall-Harper; Kristina M Terronez; Corey A Love; Andie Chan
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 5.  Legislative smoking bans for reducing secondhand smoke exposure, smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption.

Authors:  Joanne E Callinan; Anna Clarke; Kirsten Doherty; Cecily Kelleher
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-04-14

6.  Cultural factors related to smoking in San Francisco's Irish bars.

Authors:  Travis D Satterlund; Tamar M J Antin; Juliet P Lee; Roland S Moore
Journal:  J Drug Educ       Date:  2009

7.  Oklahoma tobacco policy-making.

Authors:  Michael Givel
Journal:  J Okla State Med Assoc       Date:  2005-03

8.  Oklahoma Retailers' Perspectives on Mutual Benefit Exchange to Limit Point-of-Sale Tobacco Advertisements.

Authors:  Andie Chan; Malinda Reddish Douglas; Pamela M Ling
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2015-03-12

9.  Changes in smoking-related norms in bars resulting from California's Smoke-Free Workplace Act.

Authors:  Travis D Satterlund; Juliet P Lee; Roland S Moore
Journal:  J Drug Educ       Date:  2012

10.  Tobacco industry litigation to deter local public health ordinances: the industry usually loses in court.

Authors:  M L Nixon; L Mahmoud; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Measuring public opinion and acceptability of prevention policies: an integrative review and narrative synthesis of methods.

Authors:  Eloise Howse; Katherine Cullerton; Anne Grunseit; Erika Bohn-Goldbaum; Adrian Bauman; Becky Freeman
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2022-03-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.