S Medina Villalon1, R Paz2, N Roehri3, S Lagarde1, F Pizzo3, B Colombet3, F Bartolomei1, R Carron4, C-G Bénar5. 1. Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, INS, Inst Neurosci Syst, Marseille, France; APHM, Timone Hospital, Clinical Neurophysiology, Marseille, France. 2. IFIBIO Bernardo Houssay, Grupo de Neurociencia de Sistemas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires-CONICET, 2155 Paraguay Street, Buenos Aires 1121, Argentina. 3. Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, INS, Inst Neurosci Syst, Marseille, France. 4. Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, INS, Inst Neurosci Syst, Marseille, France; APHM, Timone Hospital, Functional and Stereotactic Neurosurgery, Marseille, France. 5. Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, INS, Inst Neurosci Syst, Marseille, France. Electronic address: christian.benar@univ-amu.fr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In pharmacoresistant epilepsy, exploration with depth electrodes can be needed to precisely define the epileptogenic zone. Accurate location of these electrodes is thus essential for the interpretation of Stereotaxic EEG (SEEG) signals. As SEEG analysis increasingly relies on signal processing, it is crucial to make a link between these results and patient's anatomy. Our aims were thus to develop a suite of software tools, called "EpiTools", able to i) precisely and automatically localize the position of each SEEG contact and ii) display the results of signal analysis in each patient's anatomy. NEW METHOD: The first tool, GARDEL (GUI for Automatic Registration and Depth Electrode Localization), is able to automatically localize SEEG contacts and to label each contact according to a pre-specified nomenclature (for instance that of FreeSurfer or MarsAtlas). The second tool, 3Dviewer, enables to visualize in the 3D anatomy of the patient the origin of signal processing results such as rate of biomarkers, connectivity graphs or Epileptogenicity Index. RESULTS: GARDEL was validated in 30 patients by clinicians and proved to be highly reliable to determine within the patient's individual anatomy the actual location of contacts. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: GARDEL is a fully automatic electrode localization tool needing limited user interaction (only for electrode naming or contact correction). The 3Dviewer is able to read signal processing results and to display them in link with patient's anatomy. CONCLUSION: EpiTools can help speeding up the interpretation of SEEG data and improving its precision.
BACKGROUND: In pharmacoresistant epilepsy, exploration with depth electrodes can be needed to precisely define the epileptogenic zone. Accurate location of these electrodes is thus essential for the interpretation of Stereotaxic EEG (SEEG) signals. As SEEG analysis increasingly relies on signal processing, it is crucial to make a link between these results and patient's anatomy. Our aims were thus to develop a suite of software tools, called "EpiTools", able to i) precisely and automatically localize the position of each SEEG contact and ii) display the results of signal analysis in each patient's anatomy. NEW METHOD: The first tool, GARDEL (GUI for Automatic Registration and Depth Electrode Localization), is able to automatically localize SEEG contacts and to label each contact according to a pre-specified nomenclature (for instance that of FreeSurfer or MarsAtlas). The second tool, 3Dviewer, enables to visualize in the 3D anatomy of the patient the origin of signal processing results such as rate of biomarkers, connectivity graphs or Epileptogenicity Index. RESULTS: GARDEL was validated in 30 patients by clinicians and proved to be highly reliable to determine within the patient's individual anatomy the actual location of contacts. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: GARDEL is a fully automatic electrode localization tool needing limited user interaction (only for electrode naming or contact correction). The 3Dviewer is able to read signal processing results and to display them in link with patient's anatomy. CONCLUSION: EpiTools can help speeding up the interpretation of SEEG data and improving its precision.
Authors: Bin He; Laura Astolfi; Pedro A Valdes-Sosa; Daniele Marinazzo; Satu Palva; Christian G Benar; Christoph M Michel; Thomas Koenig Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2019-05-07 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Bryan Zheng; Ben Hsieh; Nathaniel Rex; Peter M Lauro; Scott A Collins; Andrew S Blum; Julie L Roth; Neishay Ayub; Wael F Asaad Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2022-07-19 Impact factor: 5.399
Authors: Julia Scholly; Adrien Gras; Maxime Guye; Mathias Bilger; Maria Paola Valenti Hirsch; Edouard Hirsch; Alexander Timofeev; Pierre Vidailhet; Christian G Bénar; Fabrice Bartolomei Journal: Brain Topogr Date: 2022-09-07 Impact factor: 4.275
Authors: Vasileios Dimakopoulos; Jean Gotman; William Stacey; Nicolás von Ellenrieder; Julia Jacobs; Christos Papadelis; Jan Cimbalnik; Gregory Worrell; Michael R Sperling; Maike Zijlmans; Lucas Imbach; Birgit Frauscher; Johannes Sarnthein Journal: Brain Commun Date: 2022-06-09
Authors: Viktor Sip; Meysam Hashemi; Anirudh N Vattikonda; Marmaduke M Woodman; Huifang Wang; Julia Scholly; Samuel Medina Villalon; Maxime Guye; Fabrice Bartolomei; Viktor K Jirsa Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2021-02-17 Impact factor: 4.475
Authors: F Pizzo; N Roehri; S Medina Villalon; A Trébuchon; S Chen; S Lagarde; R Carron; M Gavaret; B Giusiano; A McGonigal; F Bartolomei; J M Badier; C G Bénar Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2019-02-27 Impact factor: 14.919