Literature DB >> 2960565

A paired analysis of in vitro fertilization and cleavage rates of first- versus last-recovered preovulatory human oocytes exposed to varying intervals of 100% CO2 pneumoperitoneum and general anesthesia.

S P Boyers1, G Lavy, J B Russell, A H DeCherney.   

Abstract

This study compares the in vitro fertilization and cleavage rates of paired first- and last-recovered preovulatory human oocytes that were exposed to a 100% CO2 pneumoperitoneum and general anesthesia. In 305 consecutive cycles of laparoscopy, 1741 oocytes (5.7/cycle) were recovered. The exact time of aspiration (T) was recorded for each oocyte. The time interval (T1 to T2) between recovery of first and last oocytes ranged from 0 to 38 minutes and represented differences in the exposure time of first and last oocytes to the CO2 pneumoperitoneum and to general anesthesia. For all cycles (n = 305) without regard for T1 to T2, last-recovered oocytes fertilized less often than first-recovered eggs (P = 0.06; McNemar's test). When T1 to T2 was short (less than or equal to 5 minutes), first- and last-recovered oocytes fertilized at comparable rates (70.8% and 74.0%). When only cycles with T1 to T2 greater than 5 minutes were considered (n = 209), the difference in fertilization rates between first and last oocytes (68.5% versus 56.4%) was highly significant (P less than 0.01; McNemar's test). Pairing negated differences due to patient, cycle, or semen variables and first- and last-recovered oocytes had comparable maturity scores (4.0 +/- 0.5 versus 4.3 +/- 0.8). There were no significant differences in cleavage rates for first- and last-recovered oocytes that fertilized, regardless of the exposure interval (T1 to T2). We conclude that exposure to a 100% CO2 pneumoperitoneum and/or general anesthesia may adversely affect oocyte quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2960565     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59593-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  7 in total

1.  Anesthesia practices in the United States common to in vitro fertilization (IVF) centers.

Authors:  E C Ditkoff; J Plumb; A Selick; M V Sauer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  In vitro fertilization: a comparative study of cleavage rates under epidural and general anesthesia--interest for gamete intrafallopian transfer.

Authors:  G Lefebvre; D Vauthier; J Seebacher; M Henry; F Thormann; Y Darbois
Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf       Date:  1988-10

3.  The impact of different types of anesthesia on in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer treatment outcome.

Authors:  O Gonen; A Shulman; Y Ghetler; A Shapiro; R Judeiken; Y Beyth; I Ben-Nun
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue improves the in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancy rate with both transvaginal and laparoscopic oocyte recovery.

Authors:  J Dor; I Ben-Shlomo; S Lipitz; D Levran; A Etchin; E Rudak; S Mashiach
Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf       Date:  1990-12

5.  Epidural anesthesia in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program.

Authors:  G Botta; A D'Angelo; G D'Ari; G Merlino; M Chapman; G Grudzinskas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Effects of sera from patients given various anesthetics on preimplantation mouse embryo development in vitro.

Authors:  D W Matt; K A Steingold; C M Dastvan; C A James; W Dunwiddie
Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf       Date:  1991-08

7.  Tubal catheterization for intrafallopian insemination and transvaginal gamete (GIFT) or zygote intrafallopian transfer (ZIFT): our experience in a total of 1128 treatment cycles.

Authors:  J Tzafettas; A Loufopoulos; A Stephanatos; A Mukherjee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.412

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.