Literature DB >> 29605157

Fetal biometry to assess the size and growth of the fetus.

Neil O'Gorman1, Laurent J Salomon2.   

Abstract

Ultrasound assessment of fetal size is central to modern practice of prenatal care. It facilitates accurate pregnancy dating and screening for fetal growth disorders. This article discusses evidence-based recommended methods for pregnancy dating and biometric measurements. We address some confusing terms such as fetal growth "standards" and fetal growth "references" along with explaining the differences between prescriptive and descriptive charts and between growth charts based on estimated fetal weight vs those based on birth weight. Opinions remain divided on which charts are best to use; however, since the publication of the Intergrowth 21st study, we are now in a position to be able to assess growth and development in an internationally standardized fashion, from fetal life up to 5 years of age. A universal quality control policy can help maintain the high standard of ultrasonography required to achieve an acceptable level of diagnostic accuracy for fetal growth disorders.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Estimated fetal weight; Gestational age; Growth charts; Quality control; Screening; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29605157     DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 1521-6934            Impact factor:   5.237


  4 in total

1.  Reference values of fetal ultrasound biometry: results of a prospective cohort study in Lithuania.

Authors:  Bronius Žaliūnas; Vaidilė Jakaitė; Juozas Kurmanavičius; Daiva Bartkevičienė; Kristina Norvilaitė; Karolina Passerini
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Comparison of anthropometric measurements of foetuses in normal, gestational diabetes-affected, and hypertensive pregnancies.

Authors:  Rhea Lewis; Chandni Gupta; Rohini Punja
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2021-09-04

3.  Clinical implications of first-trimester ultrasound dating in singleton pregnancies obtained through in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Agnese Maria Chiara Rapisarda; Edgardo Somigliana; Chiara Dallagiovanna; Marco Reschini; Maria Grazia Pezone; Veronica Accurti; Giuditta Ferrara; Nicola Persico; Simona Boito
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Fetal biometry assessment with Intergrowth 21st's and Salomon's equations in rural Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Biébo Bihoun; Serge Henri Zango; Maminata Traoré-Coulibaly; Innocent Valea; Raffaella Ravinetto; Jean-Pierre Van Geertruyden; Umberto D'Alessandro; Halidou Tinto; Annie Robert
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 3.007

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.