Literature DB >> 29605110

Digital imaging and radiographic practise in diagnostic radiography: An overview of current knowledge and practice in Europe.

S Mc Fadden1, T Roding2, G de Vries3, M Benwell4, H Bijwaard5, J Scheurleer6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Recent research has identified the issue of 'dose creep' in diagnostic radiography and claims it is due to the introduction of CR and DR technology. More recently radiographers have reported that they do not regularly manipulate exposure factors for different sized patients and rely on pre-set exposures. The aim of the study was to identify any variation in knowledge and radiographic practice across Europe when imaging the chest, abdomen and pelvis using digital imaging.
METHODS: A random selection of 50% of educational institutes (n = 17) which were affiliated members of the European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS) were contacted via their contact details supplied on the EFRS website. Each of these institutes identified appropriate radiographic staff in their clinical network to complete an online survey via SurveyMonkey. Data was collected on exposures used for 3 common x-ray examinations using CR/DR, range of equipment in use, staff educational training and awareness of DRL. Descriptive statistics were performed with the aid of Excel and SPSS version 21.
RESULTS: A response rate of 70% was achieved from the affiliated educational members of EFRS and a rate of 55% from the individual hospitals in 12 countries across Europe. Variation was identified in practice when imaging the chest, abdomen and pelvis using both CR and DR digital systems. There is wide variation in radiographer training/education across countries.
CONCLUSION: There is a need for standardisation of education and training including protocols and exposure parameters to ensure that there is continued adherence to the ALARA principle. Crown
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DRL; Digital imaging; Dose creep; Education; Practice

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29605110     DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2017.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiography (Lond)        ISSN: 1078-8174


  5 in total

1.  Optimisation of tube voltage range (kVp) for AP abdomen, pelvis and spine imaging of average patients with a digital radiography (DR) imaging system using a computer simulator.

Authors:  Craig Steven Moore; Tim Wood; Stephen Balcam; Liam Needler; Tim Guest; Wee Ping Ngu; Lee Wun Chong; John Saunderson; Andrew Beavis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL HAND EXAMINATION ON SIX OPTIMISED DR SYSTEMS.

Authors:  Helle Precht; Claus Bjørn Outzen; Martin Weber Kusk; Malene Bisgaard; Dag Waaler
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Evaluation of radiographers' knowledge and attitudes of image quality optimisation in paediatric digital radiography in Saudi Arabia and Australia: a survey-based study.

Authors:  Haney Alsleem; Rob Davidson; Bandar Al-Dhafiri; Raghad Alsleem; Hussain Ameer
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2019-11-06

4.  Collimation and Exposure Parameter Influence Image Quality and Potential Radiation Dose to the Eye Lens of Personnel in Computed Radiography of the Canine Pelvis.

Authors:  Malene Bisgaard; Fintan J McEvoy; Dorte Hald Nielsen; Clara Allberg; Anna V Müller; Signe Timm; Signe N Meyer; Line Marie Johansen; Stine Pedersen; Helle Precht
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-12-14

5.  The assessment of image quality and diagnostic value in X-ray images: a survey on radiographers' reasons for rejecting images.

Authors:  Elin Kjelle; Catherine Chilanga
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-03-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.