Kevin Y Pei1, James Healy2, Kimberly A Davis2. 1. Yale School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: kevin.pei@yale.edu. 2. Yale School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, New Haven, Connecticut.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The assessment of postoperative morbidity and mortality is difficult particularly for complex patients. We hypothesize that surgeons overestimate the risk for complications and death after surgery in complex surgical patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: General surgery residents and attending surgeons estimated the likelihood of any morbidity, mortality, surgical site infection, pneumonia, and cardiac complications for seven complex scenarios. Responses were compared with the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Surgical Risk Calculator. RESULTS: From 101 residents and 48 attending surgeons, overall response rate was 61.7%. For all seven clinical scenarios, there was no difference between resident and attending predictions of morbidity or mortality, with significant variation in estimates among participants. Mean percentages of the estimates were 25.8%-30% over the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project estimates for morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: General surgery residents and attending surgeons overestimated risks in complex surgical patients. These results demonstrate broad variance in and near universal overestimation of predicted surgical risk when compared with national, risk-adjusted models. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: The assessment of postoperative morbidity and mortality is difficult particularly for complex patients. We hypothesize that surgeons overestimate the risk for complications and death after surgery in complex surgical patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: General surgery residents and attending surgeons estimated the likelihood of any morbidity, mortality, surgical site infection, pneumonia, and cardiac complications for seven complex scenarios. Responses were compared with the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Surgical Risk Calculator. RESULTS: From 101 residents and 48 attending surgeons, overall response rate was 61.7%. For all seven clinical scenarios, there was no difference between resident and attending predictions of morbidity or mortality, with significant variation in estimates among participants. Mean percentages of the estimates were 25.8%-30% over the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project estimates for morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: General surgery residents and attending surgeons overestimated risks in complex surgical patients. These results demonstrate broad variance in and near universal overestimation of predicted surgical risk when compared with national, risk-adjusted models. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Nisha Pradhan; Adam R Dyas; Michael R Bronsert; Anne Lambert-Kerzner; William G Henderson; Howe Qiu; Kathryn L Colborn; Nicholas J Mason; Robert A Meguid Journal: Patient Saf Surg Date: 2022-03-17
Authors: Mary Saad; Benjamin Salze; Bernard Trillat; Olivier Corniou; Alexandre Vallée; Morgan Le Guen; Aurélien Latouche; Marc Fischler Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-09-30 Impact factor: 4.964