Literature DB >> 29604710

The role of phase synchronisation between low frequency amplitude modulations in child phonology and morphology speech tasks.

Sheila Flanagan1, Usha Goswami1.   

Abstract

Recent models of the neural encoding of speech suggest a core role for amplitude modulation (AM) structure, particularly regarding AM phase alignment. Accordingly, speech tasks that measure linguistic development in children may exhibit systematic properties regarding AM structure. Here, the acoustic structure of spoken items in child phonological and morphological tasks, phoneme deletion and plural elicitation, was investigated. The phase synchronisation index (PSI), reflecting the degree of phase alignment between pairs of AMs, was computed for 3 AM bands (delta, theta, beta/low gamma; 0.9-2.5 Hz, 2.5-12 Hz, 12-40 Hz, respectively), for five spectral bands covering 100-7250 Hz. For phoneme deletion, data from 94 child participants with and without dyslexia was used to relate AM structure to behavioural performance. Results revealed that a significant change in magnitude of the phase synchronisation index (ΔPSI) of slower AMs (delta-theta) systematically accompanied both phoneme deletion and plural elicitation. Further, children with dyslexia made more linguistic errors as the delta-theta ΔPSI increased. Accordingly, ΔPSI between slower temporal modulations in the speech signal systematically distinguished test items from accurate responses and predicted task performance. This may suggest that sensitivity to slower AM information in speech is a core aspect of phonological and morphological development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29604710      PMCID: PMC6485374          DOI: 10.1121/1.5026239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  27 in total

1.  Low-Frequency Cortical Entrainment to Speech Reflects Phoneme-Level Processing.

Authors:  Giovanni M Di Liberto; James A O'Sullivan; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Is speech learning 'gated' by the social brain?

Authors:  Patricia K Kuhl
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2007-01

3.  Acoustic invariance in speech production: evidence from measurements of the spectral characteristics of stop consonants.

Authors:  S E Blumstein; K N Stevens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Acoustic correlates of some phonetic categories.

Authors:  K N Stevens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Sensory theories of developmental dyslexia: three challenges for research.

Authors:  Usha Goswami
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Linking speech perception and neurophysiology: speech decoding guided by cascaded oscillators locked to the input rhythm.

Authors:  Oded Ghitza
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-06-27

7.  Multi-time resolution analysis of speech: evidence from psychophysics.

Authors:  Maria Chait; Steven Greenberg; Takayuki Arai; Jonathan Z Simon; David Poeppel
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Assessment of rhythmic entrainment at multiple timescales in dyslexia: evidence for disruption to syllable timing.

Authors:  Victoria Leong; Usha Goswami
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Acoustic-Emergent Phonology in the Amplitude Envelope of Child-Directed Speech.

Authors:  Victoria Leong; Usha Goswami
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Difficulties in auditory organization as a cause of reading backwardness? An auditory neuroscience perspective.

Authors:  Victoria Leong; Usha Goswami
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2016-09-22
View more
  2 in total

1.  Hierarchical amplitude modulation structures and rhythm patterns: Comparing Western musical genres, song, and nature sounds to Babytalk.

Authors:  Tatsuya Daikoku; Usha Goswami
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  The temporal modulation structure of illiterate versus literate adult speech.

Authors:  João Araújo; Sheila Flanagan; Alexandre Castro-Caldas; Usha Goswami
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.