E William St Clair1, Alan N Baer2, Chungwen Wei3, Ghaith Noaiseh4, Anne Parke5, Andreea Coca6, Tammy O Utset7, Mark C Genovese8, Daniel J Wallace9, James McNamara10, Karen Boyle11, Lynette Keyes-Elstein11, Jeffrey L Browning12, Nathalie Franchimont13, Kira Smith14, Joel M Guthridge15, Ignacio Sanz3, Judith A James15. 1. Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina. 2. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. 3. Ignacio Sanz, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. 4. UPMC Presbyterian, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 5. Saint Francis Medical Group, Hartford, Connecticut. 6. University of Rochester, Rochester, New York. 7. University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 8. Stanford University, Palo Alto, California. 9. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California. 10. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland. 11. Rho, Inc., Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 12. Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts. 13. Biogen, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts. 14. Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, Georgia. 15. Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of baminercept, a lymphotoxin β receptor IgG fusion protein (LTβR-Ig), for the treatment of primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS), and to explore the possible mechanisms of action of this treatment. METHODS: In this multicenter trial, 52 patients with primary SS were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous injections of 100 mg of baminercept every week for 24 weeks or matching placebo. The primary end point was the change between screening and week 24 in the stimulated whole salivary flow (SWSF) rate. Secondary end points included the European League Against Rheumatism Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI), as well as measurements of select chemokines and cytokines and enumeration of peripheral blood B and T cell subsets. RESULTS: The change from baseline to week 24 in the SWSF rate was not significantly different between the baminercept and placebo treatment groups (baseline-adjusted mean change -0.01 versus 0.07 ml/minute; P = 0.332). The change in the ESSDAI during treatment was also not significantly different between the treatment groups (baseline-adjusted mean change -1.23 versus -0.15; P = 0.104). Although the incidence of adverse events was similar between the treatment groups, baminercept therapy was associated with a higher incidence of liver toxicity, including 2 serious adverse events. Baminercept also produced a significant decrease in plasma levels of CXCL13 and significant changes in the number of circulating B and T cells, consistent with its known inhibitory effects on LTβR signaling. CONCLUSION: In this trial, treatment with baminercept failed to significantly improve glandular and extraglandular disease in patients with primary SS, despite evidence from mechanistic studies showing that it blocks LTβR signaling.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of baminercept, a lymphotoxin β receptor IgG fusion protein (LTβR-Ig), for the treatment of primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS), and to explore the possible mechanisms of action of this treatment. METHODS: In this multicenter trial, 52 patients with primary SS were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous injections of 100 mg of baminercept every week for 24 weeks or matching placebo. The primary end point was the change between screening and week 24 in the stimulated whole salivary flow (SWSF) rate. Secondary end points included the European League Against Rheumatism Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI), as well as measurements of select chemokines and cytokines and enumeration of peripheral blood B and T cell subsets. RESULTS: The change from baseline to week 24 in the SWSF rate was not significantly different between the baminercept and placebo treatment groups (baseline-adjusted mean change -0.01 versus 0.07 ml/minute; P = 0.332). The change in the ESSDAI during treatment was also not significantly different between the treatment groups (baseline-adjusted mean change -1.23 versus -0.15; P = 0.104). Although the incidence of adverse events was similar between the treatment groups, baminercept therapy was associated with a higher incidence of liver toxicity, including 2 serious adverse events. Baminercept also produced a significant decrease in plasma levels of CXCL13 and significant changes in the number of circulating B and T cells, consistent with its known inhibitory effects on LTβR signaling. CONCLUSION: In this trial, treatment with baminercept failed to significantly improve glandular and extraglandular disease in patients with primary SS, despite evidence from mechanistic studies showing that it blocks LTβR signaling.
Authors: C Vitali; S Bombardieri; R Jonsson; H M Moutsopoulos; E L Alexander; S E Carsons; T E Daniels; P C Fox; R I Fox; S S Kassan; S R Pillemer; N Talal; M H Weisman Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Mustimbo E P Roberts; Denise Kaminski; Scott A Jenks; Craig Maguire; Kathryn Ching; Peter D Burbelo; Michael J Iadarola; Alexander Rosenberg; Andreea Coca; Jennifer Anolik; Iñaki Sanz Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 10.995
Authors: Jeffrey L Browning; Norm Allaire; Apinya Ngam-Ek; Evangelia Notidis; Jane Hunt; Steven Perrin; Roy A Fava Journal: Immunity Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 31.745
Authors: E William St Clair; Marc C Levesque; Eline T Luning Prak; Frederick B Vivino; Chacko J Alappatt; Meagan E Spychala; Josiah Wedgwood; James McNamara; Kathy L Moser Sivils; Lytia Fisher; Philip Cohen Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2013-04
Authors: Diana G Adlowitz; Jennifer Barnard; Jamie N Biear; Christopher Cistrone; Teresa Owen; Wensheng Wang; Arumugam Palanichamy; Ezinma Ezealah; Debbie Campbell; Chungwen Wei; R John Looney; Inaki Sanz; Jennifer H Anolik Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-06-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Judith A James; Joel M Guthridge; Hua Chen; Rufei Lu; Rebecka L Bourn; Krista Bean; Melissa E Munroe; Miles Smith; Eliza Chakravarty; Alan N Baer; Ghaith Noaiseh; Ann Parke; Karen Boyle; Lynette Keyes-Elstein; Andreea Coca; Tammy Utset; Mark C Genovese; Virginia Pascual; Paul J Utz; V Michael Holers; Kevin D Deane; Kathy L Sivils; Teresa Aberle; Daniel J Wallace; James McNamara; Nathalie Franchimont; E William St Clair Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Luke D Jasenosky; Aya Nambu; Alla V Tsytsykova; Shahin Ranjbar; Viraga Haridas; Laurens Kruidenier; David F Tough; Anne E Goldfeld Journal: J Immunol Date: 2020-09-25 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Xavier Mariette; Raphael Porcher; Raphaele Seror; Gabriel Baron; Marine Camus; Divi Cornec; Elodie Perrodeau; Simon J Bowman; Michele Bombardieri; Hendrika Bootsma; Jacques-Eric Gottenberg; Benjamin Fisher; Wolfgang Hueber; Joel A van Roon; Valérie Devauchelle-Pensec; Peter Gergely Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2022-04-07 Impact factor: 27.973