Literature DB >> 29603899

The adoption of generic immunosuppressant medications in kidney, liver, and heart transplantation among recipients in Colorado or nationally with Medicare part D.

Qian Liu1, Abigail R Smith1, Jeong M Park2, Murewa Oguntimein3, Sarah Dutcher3, Ghalib Bello1,4, Margaret Helmuth1, Marc Turenne1, Rajesh Balkrishnan5, Melissa Fava1, Charlotte A Beil1, Adam Saulles2, Sangeeta Goel2, Pratima Sharma6, Alan Leichtman1, Jarcy Zee1.   

Abstract

The transplant community is divided regarding whether substitution with generic immunosuppressants is appropriate for organ transplant recipients. We estimated the rate of uptake over time of generic immunosuppressants using US Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Event (PDE) and Colorado pharmacy claims (including both Part D and non-Part D) data from 2008 to 2013. Data from 26 070 kidney, 15 548 liver, and 6685 heart recipients from Part D, and 1138 kidney and 389 liver recipients from Colorado were analyzed. The proportions of patients with PDEs or claims for generic and brand-name tacrolimus or mycophenolate mofetil were calculated over time by transplanted organ and drug. Among Part D kidney, liver, and heart beneficiaries, the proportion dispensed generic tacrolimus reached 50%-56% at 1 year after first generic approval and 78%-81% by December 2013. The proportion dispensed generic mycophenolate mofetil reached 70%-73% at 1 year after generic market entry and 88%-90% by December 2013. There was wide interstate variability in generic uptake, with faster uptake in Colorado compared with most other states. Overall, generic substitution for tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil for organ transplant recipients increased rapidly following first availability, and utilization of generic immunosuppressants exceeded that of brand-name products within a year of market entry.
© 2018 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brand-name; generic; generic drug substitution; health services and outcomes research; heart transplantation; immunosuppressant; kidney transplantation; liver transplantation/hepatology; organ transplantation in general

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29603899      PMCID: PMC6537862          DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  22 in total

1.  The financial impact of immunosuppressant expenses on new kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Elisa J Gordon; Thomas R Prohaska; Ashwini R Sehgal
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 2.863

Review 2.  Generic immunosuppression in transplantation: current evidence and controversial issues.

Authors:  Sandra El Hajj; Miae Kim; Karen Phillips; Steven Gabardi
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Immunol       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 4.473

3.  Updated trends in US brand-name and generic drug competition.

Authors:  Henry Grabowski; Genia Long; Richard Mortimer; Ani Boyo
Journal:  J Med Econ       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.448

4.  The impact of conversion from prograf to generic tacrolimus in liver and kidney transplant recipients with stable graft function.

Authors:  J D Momper; T A Ridenour; K S Schonder; R Shapiro; A Humar; R Venkataramanan
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Generic formulation of mycophenolate mofetil (Myfenax) in de novo renal transplant recipients: results of 12-month observation.

Authors:  B Rutkowski; B Bzoma; A Dębska-Ślizień; A Chamienia
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 6.  What Is the Future of Generics in Transplantation?

Authors:  Teun van Gelder
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 7.  Generic maintenance immunosuppression in solid organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Christopher R Ensor; Jennifer Trofe-Clark; Steven Gabardi; Lisa M McDevitt-Potter; Michael A Shullo
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.705

8.  Generic immunosuppression: deciphering the message our patients are receiving.

Authors:  Amanda L Hulbert; Nicole A Pilch; David J Taber; Kenneth D Chavin; Prabhakar K Baliga
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Comparative pharmacokinetic study of two mycophenolate mofetil formulations in stable kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Gere Sunder-Plassmann; Petra Reinke; Thomas Rath; Andrzej Wiecek; Michal Nowicki; Richard Moore; Jens Lutz; Martina Gaggl; Marek Ferkl
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.782

10.  A single-centre comparison of the clinical outcomes at 6 months of renal transplant recipients administered Adoport® or Prograf® preparations of tacrolimus.

Authors:  Andrew Connor; Andrew Prowse; Paul Newell; Peter A Rowe
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2012-11-21
View more
  3 in total

1.  Secular Trends in the Cost of Immunosuppressants after Solid Organ Transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Margaret E Helmuth; Qian Liu; Marc N Turenne; Jeong M Park; Murewa Oguntimein; Sarah K Dutcher; Rajesh Balkrishnan; Pratima Sharma; Jarcy Zee; Alan B Leichtman; Abigail R Smith
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Generic Tacrolimus (Tacrobell®) Shows Comparable Outcomes to Brand-Name Tacrolimus in the Long-Term Period After Adult Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Jong Man Kim; Jae-Won Joh; Gyu-Seong Choi; Suk-Koo Lee
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 4.162

3.  Immunosuppression with generic tacrolimus in liver and kidney transplantation-systematic review and meta-analysis on biopsy-proven acute rejection and bioequivalence.

Authors:  Judith Kahn; Gudrun Pregartner; Peter Schemmer
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.782

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.