| Literature DB >> 29603637 |
Chris Wiebe1,2, Julie Ho1,3, Ian W Gibson2,4, David N Rush1, Peter W Nickerson1,3,2.
Abstract
The current immunosuppressive pipeline in kidney transplantation is limited. In part, this is due to excellent one-year allograft outcomes with the current standard of care (ie, calcineurin inhibitor in combination with anti-proliferative agents). Despite this success, a recent Federal government-sponsored systematic review has identified gaps/limits in the evidence of what constitutes optimal calcineurin inhibitor use in the short- and long-term. Moreover, recent empiric approaches to minimize/withdraw/convert from calcineurin inhibitors have come with the price of increased alloreactivity. As the time horizon to replace calcineurin inhibitors on a global scale may be distant, the transplant community should seize the opportunity to develop ways to personalize calcineurin inhibitor immunosuppression to the individual-transitioning from empiricism to precision. The authors argue in this viewpoint that the path to precision will require measures capable of detecting subclinical alloreactivity to define adequacy of immunosuppression, as well as novel genetic analytics to accurately define alloimmune risk at the individual level-both approaches will require validation in clinical trials.Entities:
Keywords: basic (laboratory) research/science; clinical research/practice; graft survival; histocompatibility; immunosuppression/immune modulation; immunosuppressive regimens; kidney transplantation/nephrology; major histocompatibility complex (MHC); monitoring: immune; risk assessment/risk stratification
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29603637 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14746
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Transplant ISSN: 1600-6135 Impact factor: 8.086