Literature DB >> 29603139

A direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion service in Australia: Retrospective analysis of the first 18 months.

Paul Hyland1, Elizabeth G Raymond2, Erica Chong2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2015, the Tabbot Foundation launched a nationwide direct-to-patient telemedicine service to enable women to obtain medical abortion without visiting an abortion provider. AIMS: We aimed to describe results from the first 18 months of this service.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: To have an abortion through the Foundation, a woman obtained screening tests locally and had a telephone consultation with a Foundation doctor. If she was eligible, mifepristone, misoprostol and other medications were sent to her by mail. After taking the drugs, the woman obtained follow-up tests at local facilities and had a consultation with Foundation professionals. The Foundation charged $250 to patients with Medicare eligibility and $600 otherwise. We summarised clinical data collected by the service.
RESULTS: Between June 2015 and December 2016, 1010 women received medications, of whom 56% lived outside of major cities. Ninety-five percent of packages were sent within 15 days after registration. Of the 965 women who took misoprostol, outcomes were definitively documented for 754 (78%), of whom 96% had a complete abortion without surgical intervention, and 95% had no face-to-face clinical encounter after treatment. Of women with Medicare cards, 72% paid no out-of-pocket charges other than to the Foundation. Nearly all women (781/802; 97%) were highly satisfied.
CONCLUSIONS: The direct-to-patient telemedicine medical abortion service was effective, safe, inexpensive and satisfactory. It disproportionately served women in parts of Australia with limited access to abortion facilities. This experience may be instructive for others desiring to use telemedicine to enhance access to abortion.
© 2018 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Australia; abortion; access; telemedicine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29603139     DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  10 in total

1.  Remote Delivery in Reproductive Health Care: Operation of Direct-to-Patient Telehealth Medication Abortion Services in Diverse Settings.

Authors:  Anna E Fiastro; Sajal Sanan; Elizabeth Jacob-Files; Elisa Wells; Francine Coeytaux; Molly R Ruben; Ian M Bennett; Emily M Godfrey
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 5.707

2.  Telemedicine for medical abortion: a systematic review.

Authors:  M Endler; A Lavelanet; A Cleeve; B Ganatra; R Gomperts; K Gemzell-Danielsson
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 3.  Recent advances in improving the effectiveness and reducing the complications of abortion.

Authors:  Sharon Cameron
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-12-02

4.  Abortion at the edges: Politics, practices, performances.

Authors:  Barbara Baird; Erica Millar
Journal:  Womens Stud Int Forum       Date:  2020-04-28

5.  Commentary: No-test medication abortion: A sample protocol for increasing access during a pandemic and beyond.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Raymond; Daniel Grossman; Alice Mark; Ushma D Upadhyay; Gillian Dean; Mitchell D Creinin; Leah Coplon; Jamila Perritt; Jessica M Atrio; DeShawn Taylor; Marji Gold
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Prevalence, attitudes and knowledge of misoprostol for self-induction of abortion in women presenting for abortion at Midwestern reproductive health clinics.

Authors:  Courtney Kerestes; Kelsey Sheets; Colleen K Stockdale; Abbey J Hardy-Fairbanks
Journal:  Sex Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2019-12

7.  Setting the Agenda for Reproductive and Maternal Health in the Era of COVID-19: Lessons from a Cruel and Radical Teacher.

Authors:  Lois McCloskey; Ndidiamaka Amutah-Onukagha; Judith Bernstein; Arden Handler
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2021-01-07

8.  Family medicine provision of online medication abortion in three US states during COVID-19.

Authors:  Emily M Godfrey; Erin K Thayer; Anna E Fiastro; Abigail R A Aiken; Rebecca Gomperts
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  The Case for Telemedical Early Medical Abortion in England: Dispelling Adult Safeguarding Concerns.

Authors:  Jordan A Parsons; Elizabeth Chloe Romanis
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2021-10-23

10.  Women's experiences of a telemedicine abortion service (up to 12 weeks) implemented during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: a qualitative evaluation.

Authors:  N Boydell; J J Reynolds-Wright; S T Cameron; J Harden
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 7.331

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.