Literature DB >> 29603037

Adopted Individuals' Views on the Utility and Value of Expanded Carrier Screening.

Sara Spencer1, Sarah Ewing2, Kathryn Calcagno3, Suzanne O'Neill4.   

Abstract

Adoptees may not have family medical history and ethnicity information. Carrier screening assesses reproductive risk. Expanded carrier screening (ECS) screens for many genetic conditions regardless of a patient's knowledge of family history and ethnicity. This study aimed to better understand the opinions and attitudes of adopted individuals on the use of ECS in determining a patient's reproductive genetic risks. Specifically, the study assessed how adopted individuals feel that results of ECS may be useful to them and whether adoptees feel that meeting with a genetics professional in the process of undergoing ECS would be useful. Adult adoptees (N = 124) were recruited online. Their opinions on ECS were explored. The majority reported they had never been offered carrier screening (92%). The majority of adoptees wanted ECS (76%). Neither the amount of contact with biological relatives nor having medical knowledge about biological relatives was significantly associated with adoptees' desire to pursue ECS. There was a significant positive correlation between adoptees of higher education levels and the amount they would pay for ECS (p = 0.004). The majority of participants (95%) indicated a genetics professional would be helpful when undergoing ECS. The findings suggest this population may want ECS and support from genetics healthcare professionals. Advocacy for genetic counseling and testing for adoptees appears justifiable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adopted; Ethnicity; Expanded carrier screen; Family history; Genetic test; Reproductive risk

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29603037     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-018-0256-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  15 in total

1.  Socio-economic status and the utilisation of physicians' services: results from the Canadian National Population Health Survey.

Authors:  S Dunlop; P C Coyte; W McIsaac
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Releasing pre-adoption birth records: a survey of Oregon adoptees.

Authors:  Julia C Rhodes; Wanda D Barfield; Melvin A Kohn; Katrina Hedberg; Kenneth C Schoendorf
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  American Society of Human Genetics Social Issues Committee report on genetics and adoption: points to consider.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Expanded carrier screening in reproductive medicine-points to consider: a joint statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, National Society of Genetic Counselors, Perinatal Quality Foundation, and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine.

Authors:  Janice G Edwards; Gerald Feldman; James Goldberg; Anthony R Gregg; Mary E Norton; Nancy C Rose; Adele Schneider; Katie Stoll; Ronald Wapner; Michael S Watson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Committee Opinion No. 690: Carrier Screening in the Age of Genomic Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Estimated pregnancy rates and rates of pregnancy outcomes for the United States, 1990-2008.

Authors:  Stephanie J Ventura; Sally C Curtin; Joyce C Abma; Stanley K Henshaw
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2012-06-20

7.  Carrier testing for severe childhood recessive diseases by next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Callum J Bell; Darrell L Dinwiddie; Neil A Miller; Shannon L Hateley; Elena E Ganusova; Joann Mudge; Ray J Langley; Lu Zhang; Clarence C Lee; Faye D Schilkey; Vrunda Sheth; Jimmy E Woodward; Heather E Peckham; Gary P Schroth; Ryan W Kim; Stephen F Kingsmore
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 17.956

8.  Fertility and the aging male.

Authors:  Isiah D Harris; Carolyn Fronczak; Lauren Roth; Randall B Meacham
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2011

Review 9.  The family history: reemergence of an established tool.

Authors:  Robert B Hinton
Journal:  Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.326

10.  Systematic design and comparison of expanded carrier screening panels.

Authors:  Kyle A Beauchamp; Dale Muzzey; Kenny K Wong; Gregory J Hogan; Kambiz Karimi; Sophie I Candille; Nikita Mehta; Rebecca Mar-Heyming; K Eerik Kaseniit; H Peter Kang; Eric A Evans; James D Goldberg; Gabriel A Lazarin; Imran S Haque
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  3 in total

1.  Current attitudes and preconceptions towards expanded carrier screening in the Eastern Chinese reproductive-aged population.

Authors:  Fang Zhang; Jianxin Tan; Binbin Shao; Tao Jiang; Ran Zhou; Yan Wang; Jingjing Zhang; Fengchang Qiao; Xiuqing Ji; Ya Wang; Ping Hu; Zhengfeng Xu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Preconception expanded carrier screening: a focus group study with relatives of mucopolysaccharidosis type III patients and the general population.

Authors:  Thirsa Conijn; Ivy van Dijke; Lotte Haverman; Phillis Lakeman; Frits A Wijburg; Lidewij Henneman
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2021-03-22

Review 3.  The evolving landscape of expanded carrier screening: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Stephanie A Kraft; Devan Duenas; Benjamin S Wilfond; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 8.822

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.