Literature DB >> 29602722

Incidental Thyroid Nodules in the National Lung Screening Trial: Estimation of Prevalence, Malignancy Rate, and Strategy for Workup.

Manisha Bahl1.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: There is limited research on the prevalence of incidental thyroid nodules (ITNs) in the United States screening population and on the appropriate evaluation of computed tomography (CT)-detected ITNs. The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of ITNs in the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) and develop a workup strategy for ITNs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT images were obtained for subjects with documented thyroid abnormalities in the CT screening arm of the NLST, subjects diagnosed with thyroid malignancies, and control subjects. Several size thresholds were compared to determine how many nodules would be further evaluated and how many thyroid malignancies would be missed had each threshold been applied at the time of workup.
RESULTS: Thyroid nodules were reported in 0.7% (117 of 17,309 subjects). In 663 control subjects without reported thyroid nodules, thyroid nodules were identified in 78 (11.8%). Reported nodules were larger than unreported nodules (21.3 vs 16.9 mm, P = .03). Thyroid malignancies were diagnosed in 0.1% (22 of 17,309). If a 20-mm rather than a 10-mm cutoff were used to determine which nodules should be further evaluated, all malignancies would be detected, but 24 rather than 62 patients would require workup, for a workup reduction rate of 48.7% (38 of 78).
CONCLUSIONS: Less than 1% of subjects in the NLST had reported ITNs. The true prevalence of ITNs was estimated to be 11.8%, which provides a better approximation of the number of patients who could potentially receive workup. A 20-mm rather than a 10-mm cutoff would reduce the workup rate by almost 50% while still capturing all malignancies.
Copyright © 2018 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  National Lung Screening Trial; Thyroid nodule; computed tomography; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29602722     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  1 in total

1.  Incidental findings on cervical spine computed tomography scans: overlooked and unimportant?

Authors:  Elham Beheshtian; Sadaf Sahraian; David M Yousem; Majid K Khan
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 2.804

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.