Literature DB >> 2960238

A sonographic screening method for Down syndrome.

C Lockwood1, B Benacerraf, A Krinsky, K Blakemore, K Belanger, M Mahoney, J Hobbins.   

Abstract

We describe a potential screening method for the second trimester detection of the fetus with Down syndrome by the use of standard sonographic biometry. Retrospective assessment of the biparietal diameter, femur length, and biparietal diameter/femur length ratio in 55 fetuses with Down syndrome and 544 control fetuses was performed at two medical centers. Adequate numbers of cases and controls were available to permit statistically significant comparisons between the groups at 15 to 23 weeks' gestation. Fetuses with Down syndrome displayed no statistically significant differences in the cephalic index or the biparietal diameter compared with controls at a given gestational age. Significant femur length shortening was observed, but the greatest statistical difference was noted for the biparietal diameter/femur length ratio. This ratio was found to decrease with gestational age in the normal population and was consistently elevated in the Down syndrome population (compared with control) throughout the second trimester. With a cutoff value of 1.5 SD above the normal population mean for the biparietal diameter/femur length ratio, 50% to 70% of fetuses with Down syndrome could be identified in 6% of the total population (p less than 0.0001). This preliminary study suggests that the biparietal diameter/femur length ratio may prove superior to current Down syndrome screening methods and, as a third independent variable, may significantly enhance the sensitivity and specificity of combined maternal age/maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein screening modalities.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2960238     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(87)80059-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  11 in total

1.  How serious are the adverse effects of screening?

Authors:  W Feldman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Sonographic markers for early diagnosis of fetal malformations.

Authors:  Maria Daniela Renna; Paola Pisani; Francesco Conversano; Emanuele Perrone; Ernesto Casciaro; Gian Carlo Di Renzo; Marco Di Paola; Antonio Perrone; Sergio Casciaro
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-10-28

3.  Trade-offs in prenatal detection of Down syndrome.

Authors:  M Serra-Prat; P Gallo; A J Jovell; M Aymerich; M D Estrada
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Genetic aspects of prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  J M Connor
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.982

5.  Maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome in early pregnancy.

Authors:  N J Wald; H S Cuckle; J W Densem; K Nanchahal; P Royston; T Chard; J E Haddow; G J Knight; G E Palomaki; J A Canick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-10-08

Review 6.  Prenatal diagnosis of common genetic disorders.

Authors:  M D Crawfurd
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988 Aug 20-27

7.  Update and Review: Maternal Serum Screening.

Authors:  K E Ormond
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 8.  Fetal ultrasonography.

Authors:  S H Garmel; M E D'Alton
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1993-09

Review 9.  Maternal serum screening for neural tube defects and fetal chromosome abnormalities.

Authors:  N C Rose; M T Mennuti
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1993-09

10.  Giants in Obstetrics and Gynecology Series: a profile of Beryl Benacerraf, MD.

Authors:  Roberto Romero
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 10.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.