Literature DB >> 29602303

Hop Distance Symmetry Does Not Indicate Normal Landing Biomechanics in Adolescent Athletes With Recent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Tishya A L Wren, Nicole M Mueske, Christopher H Brophy, J Lee Pace, Mia J Katzel, Bianca R Edison, Curtis D Vandenberg, Tracy L Zaslow.   

Abstract

Background Return-to-sport protocols after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) often include assessment of hop distance symmetry. However, it is unclear whether movement deficits are present, regardless of hop symmetry. Objectives To assess biomechanics and symmetry of adolescent athletes following ACLR during a single-leg hop for distance. Methods Forty-six patients with ACLR (5-12 months post surgery; 27 female; mean ± SD age, 15.6 ± 1.7 years) were classified as asymmetric (operative-limb hop distance less than 90% that of nonoperative limb [n = 17]) or symmetric (n = 29) in this retrospective cohort. Lower extremity biomechanics were compared among operative and contralateral limbs and 24 symmetric controls (12 female; mean ± SD age, 14.7 ± 1.5 years) using analysis of variance. Results Compared to controls, asymmetric patients hopped a shorter distance on their operative limb (P<.001), while symmetric patients hopped an intermediate distance on both sides (P≥.12). During landing, the operative limb, regardless of hop distance, exhibited lower knee flexion moments compared to controls and the contralateral side (P≤.04), with lower knee energy absorption than the contralateral side (P≤.006). During takeoff, both symmetric and asymmetric patients had less hip extension and smaller ankle range of motion on the operative side compared with controls (P≤.05). Asymmetric patients also had lower hip range of motion on the operative, compared with the contralateral, side (P = .001). Conclusion Both symmetric and asymmetric patients offloaded the operative knee; symmetric patients achieved symmetry, in part, by hopping a shorter distance on the contralateral side. Therefore, hop distance symmetry may not be an adequate test of single-limb function and return-to-sport readiness. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2018;48(8):622-629. Epub 30 Mar 2018. doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7817.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanics; motion analysis; pediatrics; single-leg hop

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29602303     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  17 in total

1.  Lower Limb Asymmetry After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Adolescent Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Gerwyn Hughes; Perry Musco; Samuel Caine; Lauren Howe
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  Lower Limb Biomechanics During Single-Leg Landings Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Peta T Johnston; Jodie A McClelland; Kate E Webster
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Test Batteries After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chelsey Roe; Cale Jacobs; Johanna Hoch; Darren L Johnson; Brian Noehren
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 3.843

4.  THE INFLUENCE OF VISUAL FIXATION ON HOP TEST PERFORMANCE.

Authors:  Brandon M Ness; Kory Zimney; Thomas Kernozek; William E Schweinle; Amy Schweinle
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-08

5.  Passing return-to-sport criteria and landing biomechanics in young athletes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Justin M Losciale; Matthew P Ithurburn; Mark V Paterno; Laura C Schmitt
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.102

6.  Quantification of Triple Single-Leg Hop Test Temporospatial Parameters: A Validated Method using Body-Worn Sensors for Functional Evaluation after Knee Injury.

Authors:  Niloufar Ahmadian; Milad Nazarahari; Jackie L Whittaker; Hossein Rouhani
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 7.  Is It Time We Better Understood the Tests We are Using for Return to Sport Decision Making Following ACL Reconstruction? A Critical Review of the Hop Tests.

Authors:  William T Davies; Gregory D Myer; Paul J Read
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  The Utility of Functional Data Analyses to Reveal Between-Limbs Asymmetries in Those With a History of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  McKenzie S White; William Z Horton; Julie P Burland; Matthew K Seeley; Lindsey K Lepley
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Vertical and Horizontal Hop Performance: Contributions of the Hip, Knee, and Ankle.

Authors:  Argyro Kotsifaki; Vasileios Korakakis; Philip Graham-Smith; Vasileios Sideris; Rod Whiteley
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.843

10.  Combining Inertial Sensors and Machine Learning to Predict vGRF and Knee Biomechanics during a Double Limb Jump Landing Task.

Authors:  Courtney R Chaaban; Nathaniel T Berry; Cortney Armitano-Lago; Adam W Kiefer; Michael J Mazzoleni; Darin A Padua
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.