Literature DB >> 29601419

Intubation with cervical spine immobilisation: a comparison between the KingVision videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope: A randomised controlled trial.

Dawid Aleksandrowicz1, Andrzej Wieczorek, Tomasz Gaszyński.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2018        PMID： 29601419     DOI： 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol        ISSN： 0265-0215            Impact factor:   4.330


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

Review 1.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation.

Authors:  Jan Hansel; Andrew M Rogers; Sharon R Lewis; Tim M Cook; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-04-04

2.  Is KingVision videolaryngoscope with a bougie really an effective solution for emergency intubation?

Authors:  Fu-Shan Xue; Rui-Juan Guoa; Liu-Jia-Zi Shao
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 9.097

3.  A randomized clinical trial comparing the King Vision (channeled blade) and the CMAC (D blade) videolaryngoscopes in patients with cervical spine immobilization.

Authors:  Jacob Chandy; Rahul Pillai; Amit Mathew; Amitav V Philip; Sajan P George; Raj Sahajanandan
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-06

4.  Split Type Postman videolaryngoscope: The newer device versus the standard Macintosh laryngoscope in simulated difficult airway - A new hope for difficult intubation scenarios.

Authors:  N S Nisanth; Qazi E Ali; Syed H Amir
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2022-03-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.