A B Fecso1,2, S S Kuzulugil3, C Babaoglu3, A B Bener3, T P Grantcharov1,2. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2. International Centre for Surgical Safety, Keenan Research Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. Data Science Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The operating theatre is a unique environment with complex team interactions, where technical and non-technical performance affect patient outcomes. The correlation between technical and non-technical performance, however, remains underinvestigated. The purpose of this study was to explore these interactions in the operating theatre. METHODS: A prospective single-centre observational study was conducted at a tertiary academic medical centre. One surgeon and three fellows participated as main operators. All patients who underwent a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and had the procedures captured using the Operating Room Black Box® platform were included. Technical assessment was performed using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills and Generic Error Rating Tool instruments. For non-technical assessment, the Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) and Scrub Practitioners' List of Intraoperative Non-Technical Skills (SPLINTS) tools were used. Spearman rank-order correlation and N-gram statistics were conducted. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were included in the study and 90 procedural steps (gastrojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy) were analysed. There was a moderate to strong correlation between technical adverse events (rs = 0·417-0·687), rectifications (rs = 0·380-0·768) and non-technical performance of the surgical and nursing teams (NOTSS and SPLINTS). N-gram statistics showed that after technical errors, events and prior rectifications, the staff surgeon and the scrub nurse exhibited the most positive non-technical behaviours, irrespective of operator (staff surgeon or fellow). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that technical and non-technical performances are related, on both an individual and a team level. Valuable data can be obtained around intraoperative errors, events and rectifications.
BACKGROUND: The operating theatre is a unique environment with complex team interactions, where technical and non-technical performance affect patient outcomes. The correlation between technical and non-technical performance, however, remains underinvestigated. The purpose of this study was to explore these interactions in the operating theatre. METHODS: A prospective single-centre observational study was conducted at a tertiary academic medical centre. One surgeon and three fellows participated as main operators. All patients who underwent a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and had the procedures captured using the Operating Room Black Box® platform were included. Technical assessment was performed using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills and Generic Error Rating Tool instruments. For non-technical assessment, the Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) and Scrub Practitioners' List of Intraoperative Non-Technical Skills (SPLINTS) tools were used. Spearman rank-order correlation and N-gram statistics were conducted. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were included in the study and 90 procedural steps (gastrojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy) were analysed. There was a moderate to strong correlation between technical adverse events (rs = 0·417-0·687), rectifications (rs = 0·380-0·768) and non-technical performance of the surgical and nursing teams (NOTSS and SPLINTS). N-gram statistics showed that after technical errors, events and prior rectifications, the staff surgeon and the scrub nurse exhibited the most positive non-technical behaviours, irrespective of operator (staff surgeon or fellow). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that technical and non-technical performances are related, on both an individual and a team level. Valuable data can be obtained around intraoperative errors, events and rectifications.
Authors: Tyler J Loftus; Alexander P J Vlaar; Andrew J Hung; Azra Bihorac; Bradley M Dennis; Catherine Juillard; Daniel A Hashimoto; Haytham M A Kaafarani; Patrick J Tighe; Paul C Kuo; Shuhei Miyashita; Steven D Wexner; Kevin E Behrns Journal: Surgery Date: 2021-11-21 Impact factor: 4.348
Authors: Lauren R Kennedy-Metz; Pietro Mascagni; Antonio Torralba; Roger D Dias; Pietro Perona; Julie A Shah; Nicolas Padoy; Marco A Zenati Journal: IEEE Trans Med Robot Bionics Date: 2020-11-24
Authors: Thomas C Edwards; Arjun Patel; Bartosz Szyszka; Alexander W Coombs; Alexander D Liddle; Rakesh Kucheria; Justin P Cobb; Kartik Logishetty Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2021-07-28 Impact factor: 3.067