Literature DB >> 29600905

Therapeutic outcomes of transsphenoidal surgery in pediatric patients with craniopharyngiomas: a single-center study.

Shozo Yamada1,2, Noriaki Fukuhara1, Mitsuo Yamaguchi-Okada1, Hiroshi Nishioka1,2, Akira Takeshita3,2, Yasuhiro Takeuchi3,2, Naoko Inoshita4,2, Junko Ito5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) in a single-center clinical series of pediatric craniopharyngioma patients treated with gross-total resection (GTR). METHODS The authors retrospectively reviewed the surgical outcomes for 65 consecutive patients with childhood craniopharyngiomas (28 girls and 37 boys, mean age 9.6 years) treated with TSS (45 primary and 20 repeat surgeries) between 1990 and 2015. Tumors were classified as subdiaphragmatic or supradiaphragmatic. Demographic and clinical characteristics, including extent of resection, complications, incidence of recurrence, pre- and postoperative visual disturbance, pituitary function, and incidence of diabetes insipidus (DI), as well as new-onset obesity, were analyzed and compared between the primary surgery and repeat surgery groups. RESULTS Of the 45 patients in the primary surgery group, 26 (58%) had subdiaphragmatic tumors and 19 had supradiaphragmatic tumors. Of the 20 patients in the repeat surgery group, 9 (45%) had subdiaphragmatic tumors and 11 had supradiaphragmatic tumors. The only statistically significant difference between the 2 surgical groups was in tumor size; tumors were larger (mean maximum diameter 30 mm) in the primary surgery group than in the repeat surgery group (25 mm) (p = 0.008). GTR was accomplished in 59 (91%) of the 65 cases; the GTR rate was higher in the primary surgery group than in the repeat surgery group (98% vs 75%, p = 0.009). Among the patients who underwent GTR, 12% experienced tumor recurrence, with a median follow-up of 7.8 years, and recurrence tended to occur less frequently in primary than in repeat surgery patients (7% vs 27%, p = 0.06). Of the 45 primary surgery patients, 80% had deteriorated pituitary function and 83% developed DI, whereas 100% of the repeat surgery patients developed these conditions. Among patients with preoperative visual disturbance, vision improved in 62% but worsened in 11%. Visual improvement was more frequent in primary than in repeat surgery patients (71% vs 47%, p < 0.001), whereas visual deterioration was less frequent following primary surgery than repeat surgery (4% vs 24%, p = 0.04). Among the 57 patients without preoperative obesity, new-onset postoperative obesity was found in 9% of primary surgery patients and 21% of repeat surgery patients (p = 0.34) despite aggressive resection, suggesting that hypothalamic dysfunction was rarely associated with GTR by TSS in this series. However, obesity was found in 25% of the repeat surgery patients preoperatively due to prior transcranial surgery. Although there were no perioperative deaths, there were complications in 12 cases (18%) (6 cases of CSF leaks, 3 cases of meningitis, 2 cases of transient memory disturbance, and 1 case of hydrocephalus). Postoperative CSF leakage appeared to be more common in repeat than in primary surgery patients (20% vs 4.4%, p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS The results of TSS for pediatric craniopharyngioma in this case series suggest that GTR should be the goal for the first surgical attempt. GTR should be achievable without serious complications, although most patients require postoperative hormonal replacement. When GTR is not possible or tumor recurrence occurs after GTR, radiosurgery is recommended to prevent tumor regrowth or progression.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMI = body mass index; DI = diabetes insipidus; GTR = gross-total resection; IQR = interquartile range; QoL = quality of life; SD = standard deviation; STR = subtotal resection; TCS = transcranial surgery; TSS = transsphenoidal surgery; VP = ventriculoperitoneal; endoscopic endonasal approach; exTSS = extended TSS; extended transsphenoidal approach; hypothalamic obesity; pediatric craniopharyngioma; pituitary surgery; skull base surgery; transsphenoidal surgery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29600905     DOI: 10.3171/2017.10.PEDS17254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr        ISSN: 1933-0707            Impact factor:   2.375


  12 in total

1.  Pedicled nasoseptal flap reconstruction for craniopharyngiomas in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Anya Laibangyang; Shaun D Rodgers; Shanna L Baron; B Todd Schaeffer; Mark Shikowitz; Mark A Mittler; Steven J Schneider
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Endoscopic extended transsphenoidal surgery for newly diagnosed paediatric craniopharyngiomas.

Authors:  Mohsen Javadpour; Michael Amoo; Darach Crimmins; John Caird; Patricia Daly; Jane Pears; Cormac Owens; Michael Capra; Declan Cody
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Sinonasal Symptom Outcomes following Endoscopic Anterior Cranial Base Surgery in the Pediatric Population.

Authors:  Taylor R Carle; Vivian Wung; Anthony P Heaney; Harvey K Chiu; Jeffrey D Suh; Marvin Bergsneider; Marilene B Wang
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-05-17

4.  The endoscopic endonasal approach for pediatric craniopharyngiomas: the key lessons learned.

Authors:  Elena d'Avella; Domenico Solari; Teresa Somma; Giovanni Miccoli; Mihailo Milicevic; Paolo Cappabianca; Luigi Maria Cavallo
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 5.  Pediatric sinonasal and skull base lesions.

Authors:  Charles A Riley; Christian P Soneru; Jonathan B Overdevest; Marc L Otten; David A Gudis
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-04-08

6.  Prognostic Utility of Optical Coherence Tomography for Visual Outcome After Extended Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Adult Craniopharyngiomas.

Authors:  Ning Qiao; Chuzhong Li; Jing Xu; Guofo Ma; Jie Kang; Lu Jin; Lei Cao; Chunhui Liu; Yazhuo Zhang; Songbai Gui
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Extended Neuroendoscopic Endonasal Approach for Resection of Craniopharyngioma in Children.

Authors:  Danyang Wu; Ling Xu; Sungel Xie; Feiji Sun; Mingxiang Xie; Pei Wang; Shunwu Xiao
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Clinical Outcomes of Transcranial and Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Craniopharyngiomas: A Single-Institution Experience.

Authors:  Chuansheng Nie; Youfan Ye; Jingnan Wu; Hongyang Zhao; Xiaobing Jiang; Haijun Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Development and Validation of Predicting Nomograms for Craniopharyngioma: A Retrospective, Multiple-Center, Cohort Study.

Authors:  Dingkang Xu; Qingjie Wei; Zhe Li; Yan Hu; Peizhu Hu; Shengqi Zhao; Dengpan Song; Shixiong Lei; Mingchu Zhang; Qiang Gao; Longxiao Zhang; Fangbo Lin; Yuchao Zuo; Xianzhi Liu; Mengzhao Feng; Chunxiao Ma; Fuyou Guo
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  Current Advances in the Management of Adult Craniopharyngiomas.

Authors:  Montserrat Lara-Velazquez; Yusuf Mehkri; Eric Panther; Jairo Hernandez; Dinesh Rao; Peter Fiester; Raafat Makary; Michael Rutenberg; Daryoush Tavanaiepour; Gazanfar Rahmathulla
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.