Literature DB >> 29600817

Nurses' perception of how an e-message system influences cross-sectoral communication: A qualitative study.

Helle V Petersen1, Signe Foged1, Annette L Madsen2, Ove Andersen1, Vibeke Nørholm1.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate hospital and home care nurses' experiences on how an e-message system influences cross-sectoral communication 2 years after introduction.
BACKGROUND: Cross-sectoral communication is identified as the main barrier for high quality in transitional care. An e-message system was introduced to ensure dialogue and precise and useful information exchange.
METHODS: Nurses from one hospital and six collaborating municipalities were included. Semi-structured focus group interviews and participation observation was conducted and data were analysed using content analysis.
RESULTS: The e-message system was used in both sectors but did not promote cross-sectoral dialogue. The home care nurses expressed distrust in the information from the hospital. The hospital nurses' intention was to provide relevant and accurate information but their main focus was to fulfil the standards within the system rather than the quality of the information exchanged.
CONCLUSIONS: The e-message system supports a one-way information flow, rather than the intended loop of information exchange and dialogue. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Nurse managers should recognise that although an e-message system is being used in a clinical setting, it may not support exchange of high-quality information and dialogue. Focus must be on both standards as well as quality when new systems are introduced.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  collaboration; communication; e-message system; nursing management; organisational change

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29600817     DOI: 10.1111/jonm.12575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nurs Manag        ISSN: 0966-0429            Impact factor:   3.325


  4 in total

1.  To Text or Not to Text? That is the Question.

Authors:  Gregory L Alexander; Riley Harrell; Sue Shumate; Mason Rothert; Amy Vogelsmeier; Lori Popejoy; Marilyn Rantz
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2021-01-25

Review 2.  Barriers and Benefits of Information Communication Technologies Used by Health Care Aides.

Authors:  Hector Perez; Noelannah Neubauer; Samantha Marshall; Serrina Philip; Antonio Miguel-Cruz; Lili Liu
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Co-designing implementation strategies for the WALK-Cph intervention in Denmark aimed at increasing mobility in acutely hospitalized older patients: a qualitative analysis of selected strategies and their justifications.

Authors:  Jeanette Wassar Kirk; Per Nilsen; Ove Andersen; Byron J Powell; Tine Tjørnhøj-Thomsen; Thomas Bandholm; Mette Merete Pedersen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-02       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 4.  Clinicians' experience of providing care: a rapid review.

Authors:  Maha Pervaz Iqbal; Elizabeth Manias; Laurel Mimmo; Stephen Mears; Briony Jack; Liz Hay; Reema Harrison
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.