Literature DB >> 29600570

Medical communication: the views of simulated patients.

William Laughey1, Nora Sangvik Grandal1, Gabrielle M Finn1.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Simulated patients (SPs) are extensively used in the teaching of medical communication, both for students and doctors. They occupy a unique middle ground between patients and physicians: although free from the prejudices that medical training brings, they work closely with clinical tutors to promote the principles of patient-centred consulting. Despite this, there is relatively little research around their views on what makes for good communication practice. This study aims to address this gap in the literature through a qualitative analysis of SPs' opinions, especially in the context of medical student communication.
METHODS: Eighteen SPs from two medical schools, Hull York Medical School and Durham, were interviewed, using an in-depth, one-to-one, semi-structured approach. Data, transcribed verbatim, were thematically analysed.
RESULTS: Three global themes were identified: (i) listening and empathy and showing it, (ii) continual human connection and (iii) information flow from the patient. These three themes, termed the communication triad, form a type of virtuous circle, each facilitating the other. Listening and empathy were facilitated through attributes, including attentive non-verbal communication, and through responding to cues, including making effective empathetic statements. Continual human connection was facilitated through successful beginnings, including preferring open questions to 'robotic' tick-list questions and allowing patients time to have their say. Mirroring, professional appearance, appropriate physical contact and a human approach were amongst other factors facilitating connection with patients. Information flow was encouraged by factors including showing an interest in the patient and use of silence; flow was curtailed by undesirable attributes, including interrupting, dismissive communication and making assumptions about aspects such as sexuality.
CONCLUSION: This first in-depth study of SPs' views on medical consulting identifies a communication triad that both affirms and builds on the current literature base. Five novel teaching points emerge, with clear relevance for best practice communication teaching and curricula design.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and The Association for the Study of Medical Education.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29600570     DOI: 10.1111/medu.13547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  4 in total

1.  Emotion recognition and extraversion of medical students interact to predict their empathic communication perceived by simulated patients.

Authors:  Teresa Schreckenbach; Falk Ochsendorf; Jasmina Sterz; Miriam Rüsseler; Wolf Otto Bechstein; Bernd Bender; Myriam N Bechtoldt
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 2.463

2.  The Patient, the Physician, or the Relationship: Who or What Is "Difficult", Exactly? an Approach for Managing Conflicts between Patients and Physicians.

Authors:  Issam Tanoubi; Llian Cruz-Panesso; Pierre Drolet
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Ova-looking feminist theory: a call for consideration within health professions education and research.

Authors:  G M Finn; M E L Brown
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.629

4.  An Exploratory Mixed Methods Study of Standardized Patient Comments on Empathy and Student Communication Scores.

Authors:  Logan T Murry; Jeffrey C Reist; Michelle A Fravel; Laura E Knockel; Mathew J Witry
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.047

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.