Michael Schultz1, Tehilah Meged-Book2, Tanya Mashiach3, Gil Bar-Sela4,5,6. 1. Division of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel. 2. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel. 3. Statistical Department, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel. 4. Division of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel. g_barsela@rambam.health.gov.il. 5. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel. g_barsela@rambam.health.gov.il. 6. Integrated Oncology and Palliative Care Unit, Rambam Health Care Campus, POB 9602, 31096, Haifa, Israel. g_barsela@rambam.health.gov.il.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although spiritual distress is present across cultures, the ways in which patients experience it vary between cultures. Our goal was to examine the cultural expression and key indicators of spiritual distress in Israel. METHODS: We conducted a structured interview of 202 oncology outpatients in a cross-sectional study. Self-diagnosis of spiritual distress, which is a demonstrated gold standard for identifying its presence, was compared with the Facit-Sp-12 and a number of other items (from the Spiritual Injury Scale and newly developed Israeli items) hypothesized as Israeli cultural expressions of spiritual distress, demographic and medical data, and patient desire to receive spiritual care. RESULTS: Significant variation was found between Israeli cultural expression of spiritual distress and that found in studies from other countries. Key expressions of spiritual distress in this study included lack of inner peace, grief, and an inability to accept what is happening. Items related to faith were not significant, and loss of meaning showed mixed results. Patients requesting spiritual care were more likely to be in spiritual distress. No demographic or medical data correlated with spiritual distress. CONCLUSIONS: Specially designed interventions to reduce spiritual distress should address the expressions of the distress specific to that culture. Studies of the efficacy of spiritual care can examine the extent of spiritual distress in general or of its specific cultural expressions.
BACKGROUND: Although spiritual distress is present across cultures, the ways in which patients experience it vary between cultures. Our goal was to examine the cultural expression and key indicators of spiritual distress in Israel. METHODS: We conducted a structured interview of 202 oncology outpatients in a cross-sectional study. Self-diagnosis of spiritual distress, which is a demonstrated gold standard for identifying its presence, was compared with the Facit-Sp-12 and a number of other items (from the Spiritual Injury Scale and newly developed Israeli items) hypothesized as Israeli cultural expressions of spiritual distress, demographic and medical data, and patient desire to receive spiritual care. RESULTS: Significant variation was found between Israeli cultural expression of spiritual distress and that found in studies from other countries. Key expressions of spiritual distress in this study included lack of inner peace, grief, and an inability to accept what is happening. Items related to faith were not significant, and loss of meaning showed mixed results. Patients requesting spiritual care were more likely to be in spiritual distress. No demographic or medical data correlated with spiritual distress. CONCLUSIONS: Specially designed interventions to reduce spiritual distress should address the expressions of the distress specific to that culture. Studies of the efficacy of spiritual care can examine the extent of spiritual distress in general or of its specific cultural expressions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Chaplaincy; Cultural match; Cultural variance; Spiritual care; Spiritual distress
Authors: Patricia E Murphy; Andrea L Canada; George Fitchett; Kevin Stein; Kenneth Portier; Corinne Crammer; Amy H Peterman Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Maciej Klimasiński; Ewa Baum; Joanna Praczyk; Monika Ziemkiewicz; Daria Springer; Szczepan Cofta; Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-01 Impact factor: 4.614