Literature DB >> 29600386

Survival impact of post-progression chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sakura Iizumi1,2, Atsuo Takashima3, Kentaro Sakamaki4, Satoshi Morita5, Narikazu Boku1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on survival impact of post-progression chemotherapy (post-Cx) after first-line chemotherapy (1st-Cx) and after second-line chemotherapy (2nd-Cx), and survival benefit of third-line chemotherapy (3rd-Cx) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC).
METHODS: Phase III trials of systemic chemotherapy for AGC published in English between 2005 and 2015 or presented at annual meetings of ASCO or ESMO between 2013 and 2015 were searched. Numbers of patients, types of chemotherapy, patient baseline, proportion of patients receiving post-Cx (post-Cx%), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS) of each treatment arm were surveyed; trials not reporting these parameters were excluded. Median post-progression survival (mPPS) was calculated as the difference between mOS and mPFS. Weighted Spearman's correlation coefficients between post-Cx% and survival outcomes (mOS and mPPS) were calculated. The effect of post-Cx% on survival outcomes adjusted for the types of chemotherapy and patient characteristics was evaluated by meta-regression.
RESULTS: Overall, 25 phase III trials of AGC were selected: 15 trials with 31 arms for 1st-Cx, and 10 trials with 16 arms for 2nd-Cx. Weighted Spearman's correlation coefficients for post-Cx% and mOS/mPPS were 0.520/0.739 for 1st-Cx, and 0.767/0.823 for 2nd-Cx. Meta-regression analyses adjusting for types of chemotherapy, age, and PS showed that a 10% increase in post-Cx% was associated with prolongation of mOS by 1.033 months for 1st-Cx and 0.344 months for 2nd-Cx.
CONCLUSIONS: Post-Cx% both after 1st-Cx and 2nd-Cx were correlated with mOS/mPPS, suggesting a survival benefit of 3rd-Cx in addition to that of 2nd-Cx for AGC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  First-line chemotherapy; Gastric cancer; Post-progression survival; Second-line chemotherapy; Third-line chemotherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29600386     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-018-3569-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  12 in total

1.  Second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent biliary tract cancer: a single center, retrospective analysis of 294 cases.

Authors:  Naminatsu Takahara; Yousuke Nakai; Hiroyuki Isayama; Takashi Sasaki; Kei Saito; Hiroki Oyama; Sachiko Kanai; Tatsunori Suzuki; Tatsuya Sato; Ryunosuke Hakuta; Kazunaga Ishigaki; Tsuyoshi Takeda; Tomotaka Saito; Suguru Mizuno; Hirofumi Kogure; Minoru Tada; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  Impact of peripheral neuropathy induced by platinum in first-line chemotherapy on second-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel for advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ryo Otsuka; Satoru Iwasa; Takako Yanai; Hidekazu Hirano; Hirokazu Shoji; Yoshitaka Honma; Natsuko Okita; Atsuo Takashima; Ken Kato; Hironobu Hashimoto; Masatoshi Sekiguchi; Yoshinori Makino; Narikazu Boku; Masakazu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Changes in Chemotherapeutic Strategies and Their Prognostic Impact in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Takaaki Arigami; Daisuke Matsushita; Keishi Okubo; Takako Tanaka; Ken Sasaki; Yusuke Tsuruda; Yoshiaki Kita; Shinichiro Mori; Hiroshi Kurahara; Yoshikazu Uenosono; Takao Ohtsuka
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Efficacy and Safety of FOLFOX in Advanced Gastric Cancer Initially Presenting With Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation.

Authors:  Naoki Takahashi; Takayuki Ando; Iori Motoo; Miho Sakumura; Yuko Ueda; Shinya Kajiura; Koji Nakashima; Ayumu Hosokawa; Akira Ueda; Nobuhiro Suzuki; Atsuko Nakaya; Ichiro Yasuda
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.406

5.  Outcomes of 596 Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients with Different Numbers of Chemotherapy Lines: The More Chemotherapy Lines, the Better Survival.

Authors:  Li Sun; Huijun Wang; Zhen Liu; Ying Meng; Meiqing Qiu; Yafei Ju; Shu Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 6.  Practical guidance for the evaluation of disease progression and the decision to change treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer receiving chemotherapy.

Authors:  Satoru Iwasa; Toshihiro Kudo; Daisuke Takahari; Hiroki Hara; Ken Kato; Taroh Satoh
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  Recent Developments of Systemic Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Arai; Takako Eguchi Nakajima
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Treatment sequences of patients with advanced colorectal cancer and use of second-line FOLFIRI with antiangiogenic drugs in Japan: A retrospective observational study using an administrative database.

Authors:  Eiji Shinozaki; Akitaka Makiyama; Yoshinori Kagawa; Hironaga Satake; Yoshinori Tanizawa; Zhihong Cai; Yongzhe Piao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Achieving sequential therapy in advanced gastric cancer: the importance of appropriate patient management for the elderly and/or those with ascites.

Authors:  Yasuo Hamamoto; Yongzhe Piao; Akitaka Makiyama
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 7.370

10.  The start of gastrectomy at different time-of-day influences postoperative outcomes.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Yizhou Yao; Xuchao Wang; Hao Li; Huan Qian; Linhua Jiang; Xinguo Zhu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.